Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 55, Issue 2 , Pages 318-325, February 2012

Hybrid repair of thoracic aortic lesions for zone 0 and 1 in high-risk patients

  • Nadia Vallejo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Arizona Heart Institute & Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz
  • ,
  • Julio A. Rodriguez-Lopez, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Arizona Heart Institute & Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Julio A. Rodriguez-Lopez, MD, Department of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Arizona Heart Institute & Hospital, 2632 North 20th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85006
  • ,
  • Paniz Heidari, MBS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Osteopathic Medicine, Arizona Midwestern University, Phoenix, Ariz
  • ,
  • Grayson Wheatley, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Arizona Heart Institute & Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz
  • ,
  • David Caparrelli, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Arizona Heart Institute & Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz
  • ,
  • Venkatesh Ramaiah, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Arizona Heart Institute & Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz
  • ,
  • Edward B. Diethrich, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Arizona Heart Institute & Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz

Received 18 February 2011; accepted 24 August 2011. published online 03 November 2011.

Purpose

Some patients with aortic arch or descending thoracic aorta pathologies are not suited for open repair because of comorbidities that may increase their risk of procedural complications or death. Endovascular approaches may also be difficult when there are inadequate proximal landing zones in the aortic arch. We report our experience using rerouting techniques with bypass, stenting of the branches, or a combination of both to create a landing area in zones 0 and 1 of the aortic arch.

Methods

Since November 2002, thoracic aortic endoluminal grafts were placed in 38 patients in whom the endograft was deployed in zone 0 (n = 27) or zone 1 (n = 11). A retrospective review is included.

Results

There were 11 women and 27 men with a mean age of 65.4 years (range 38-88). Aortic pathology included 12 Stanford type A dissections, 10 aortic arch aneurysms, 8 Stanford type B dissections, 3 descending thoracic aortic aneurysms, 2 aortobronchial fistulas, 1 innominate artery aneurysm and 2 aortic arch pseudoaneurysms. In zone 0, 21 had thoracic debranching with an ascending bypass, three patients had a remote-inflow and three patients had a chimney-stent with carotid-carotid bypass. In zone 1, five patients had a carotid-carotid bypass, one patient had an aortic to left common carotid artery (LCCA) bypass and five patients had chimney-stent on the LCCA. Fifty-eight percent of the patients were symptomatic and 26% emergent. Three patients required hemodialysis postoperatively (7.9%), 18 patients (47.4%) required prolonged mechanical ventilation for respiratory insufficiency. Paraplegia occurred in one patient (2.7%), and five patients suffered a cerebrovascular accident (13.1%). There were four early type I and two type II endoleaks. Overall 30-day mortality was 23.7%.

Conclusions

The hybrid approach for repair of the aortic arch pathologies is feasible in patients unfit for open repair. We present the results of performing different techniques to treat the aortic arch with hybrid repair with antegrade or retrograde inflow, stenting of the branches or a combination of both. Long-term results are unknown, and larger series results and comparative studies are needed to determine safety and efficacy.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competition of interest: Dr Wheatley is a consultant for W. L. Gore and Associates, Inc.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(11)01973-2

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.08.042

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 55, Issue 2 , Pages 318-325, February 2012