« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 52, Issue 5
, Pages 1234-1241
, November 2010
Prospective randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and surgery for treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins with a 2-year follow-up
References
- . Treatment options for primary varicose veins: a review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30:83–95
- . Long saphenous vein stripping and quality of life—a randomized trial. Eur J Vasc Surg. 2001;21:545–549
- . The effect of long saphenous vein stripping on quality of life. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1197–1203
- . The first 1000 cases of Italian Endovenous-EVL Working Group (IEWG) (Rationale, and long-term outcomes for the 1999-2003 period). Int Angiol. 2006;25:209–215
- . Saphenous ablation: what are the choices, EVL or RF energy. Semin Vasc Surg. 2005;18:15–18
- . Systematic review of EVL treatment for varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1189–1194
- . Endovenous EVL treatment of saphenous vein reflux: long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:991–996
- . Infrequent early recanalization of greater saphenous vein after endovenous EVL treatment. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:511–516
- . Systemic review of endovenous laser therapy versus surgery for the treatment of saphenous varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009;23:277–287
- . Randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with high ligation and stripping in patients with varicose veins: short-term results. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:308–315
- . High ligation combined with stripping and endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein: early results of a randomized controlled study. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:822–829
- . Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with surgery for the treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2008;95:294–301
- Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: consensus statement. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:1248–1252
- . Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of non-pharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:295–309
- . The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III (Test of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups). Med Care. 1994;32:40–66
- . Venous severity scoring: an adjunct to venous outcome assessment. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:1307–1312
- . Endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;46:395–405
- . A nonrandomized controlled trial of endovenous laser therapy and surgery in the treatment of varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;20:451–457
- . Comparison of endovenous treatment with an 810 nm laser versus conventional stripping of the great saphenous vein in patients with primary varicose veins. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:1685–1694
- . Endovenous laser therapy-application studies and latest investigations. J Biophotonics. 2010;3:269–276
- . First results with a new 1470-nm diode laser for endovenous ablation of incompetent saphenous veins. Phlebology. 2009;24:26–30
- Duplex-derived evidence of reflux after varicose vein surgery: neoreflux or neorevascularization?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999;17:230–233
- . Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux: long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:991–996
- . Nonocclusion and early reopening of the great saphenous vein after endovenous laser treatment is fluence dependent. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:174–178
- . Mid-term results following endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of saphenous veins with a 980nm diode laser. Int Angiol. 2008;27:475–481
- . Greater energy delivery improves treatment success of endovenous laser treatment of incompetent saphenous veins. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:1061–1063
- . Infrequent early recanalization of greater saphenous vein after endovenous laser treatment. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:511–516
- . The fate and clinical significance of sapheno-femoral junction tributaries following endovenous laser ablation of great saphenous vein. Br J Surg. 2007;94:722–775
- . Endovenous ablation of incompetent saphenous veins: a large single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13:244–248
The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.
Competition of interest: none.
PII: S0741-5214(10)01499-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.104
© 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 52, Issue 5
, Pages 1234-1241
, November 2010
