Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 52, Issue 3 , Pages 539-548 , September 2010

Analysis of risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of more than 3 million individuals

  • K. Craig Kent, MD

      Affiliations

    • Society for Vascular Surgery Screening Task Force, Society for Vascular Surgery, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • Robert M. Zwolak, MD

      Affiliations

    • Society for Vascular Surgery Screening Task Force, Society for Vascular Surgery, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • Natalia N. Egorova, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Evidence and Policy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Thomas S. Riles, MD

      Affiliations

    • Society for Vascular Surgery Screening Task Force, Society for Vascular Surgery, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • Andrew Manganaro, MD

      Affiliations

    • Society for Vascular Surgery Screening Task Force, Society for Vascular Surgery, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • Alan J. Moskowitz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Evidence and Policy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Annetine C. Gelijns, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Evidence and Policy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Giampaolo Greco, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Evidence and Policy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Giampaolo Greco, PhD, MPH, Assistant Professor Department of Health Evidence and Policy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine. One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1077, New York, NY 10029

Received 17 February 2010 ,Accepted 4 May 2010.

References 

  1. Sakalihasan N, Limet R, Defawe OD. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Lancet. 2005;3659470:1577–1589
  2. Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM. Clinical practice (Small abdominal aortic aneurysms). N Engl J Med. 2003;34819:1895–1901
  3. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. WISQARS leading causes of death reports, 1999-2005. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/leadcaus10.htmlAccessed: Feb 25, 2009
  4. Schermerhorn M. A 66-year-old man with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: review of screening and treatment. JAMA. 2009;30218:2015–2022
  5. Silverstein MD, Pitts SR, Chaikof EL, Ballard DJ. Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): cost-effectiveness of screening, surveillance of intermediate-sized AAA, and management of symptomatic AAA. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2005;184:345–367
  6. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2005;1423:198–202
  7. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, Kim LG, Marteau TM, Scott RA, et al. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;3609345:1531–1539
  8. Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW. Hospital costs and benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (Results from a randomised population screening trial). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;231:55–60
  9. Norman PE, Jamrozik K, Lawrence-Brown MM, Le MT, Spencer CA, Tuohy RJ, et al. Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ. 2004;329:1259
  10. Scott RA, Wilson NM, Ashton HA, Kay DN. Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5-year results of a randomized controlled study. Br J Surg. 1995;828:1066–1070
  11. Mureebe L, Egorova N, Giacovelli JK, Gelijns A, Kent KC, McKinsey JF. National trends in the repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2008;485:1101–1107
  12. Kung HC, Hoyert DL, Xu J, Murphy SL. Deaths: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2008;5610:1–120
  13. Longo C, Upchurch GR. Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: recommendations and controversies. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2005;393:213–219
  14. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Hye RJ, Makaroun MS, et al. The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: validation cohort and final results (Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators). Arch Intern Med. 2000;16010:1425–1430
  15. Brady AR, Thompson SG, Fowkes FG, Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT. Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: risk factors and time intervals for surveillance. Circulation. 2004;1101:16–21
  16. Brown LC, Powell JT. Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance (UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants). Ann Surg. 1999;2303:289–296discussion 296-7
  17. Vouyouka AG, Kent KC. Arterial vascular disease in women. J Vasc Surg. 2007;466:1295–1302
  18. Gillum RF. Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm in the United States. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;4811:1289–1298
  19. LaMorte WW, Scott TE, Menzoian JO. Racial differences in the incidence of femoral bypass and abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy in Massachusetts: relationship to cardiovascular risk factors. J Vasc Surg. 1995;213:422–431
  20. Johnson G, Avery A, McDougal EG, Burnham SJ, Keagy BA. Aneurysms of the abdominal aorta (Incidence in blacks and whites in North Carolina). Arch Surg. 1985;12010:1138–1140
  21. Lee ES, Pickett E, Hedayati N, Dawson DL, Pevec WC. Implementation of an aortic screening program in clinical practice: implications for the Screen For Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) Act. J Vasc Surg. 2009;495:1107–1111

 This study was funded by a grant to the Society for Vascular Surgery from Life Line Screening, Independence, OH. The Society for Vascular Surgery provided a grant to the department of Health Evidence and Policy at Mount Sinai School of Medicine to be the data coordinating center for this project.

 Competition of interest: Dr Manganaro is the Chief Medical Officer and a salaried employee of Life Line Screening, which is the source of the data used in this study, and reports no financial gain or any other material benefits from this publication.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(10)01302-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.090

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 52, Issue 3 , Pages 539-548 , September 2010