Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 52, Issue 4 , Pages 906-913.e4, October 2010

Outcomes of carotid stenting compared with endarterectomy are equivalent in asymptomatic patients and inferior in symptomatic patients

  • Jeannine K. Giacovelli, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Evidence and Health Policy Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Natalia Egorova, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Evidence and Health Policy Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Rajeev Dayal, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery, the Universities of Columbia and Cornell, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Annetine Gelijns, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Evidence and Health Policy Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • James McKinsey, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery, the Universities of Columbia and Cornell, New York, NY
  • ,
  • K. Craig Kent, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisc
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: K. Craig Kent, MD, A. R. Curreri Professor, Chairman, Department of Surgery, UW School of Medicine & Public Health, H4/710 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-7375

Received 1 March 2010; accepted 4 May 2010. published online 12 July 2010.

Background

Despite the current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services coverage criteria for carotid artery stenting (CAS), consensus regarding its appropriateness in patients with carotid artery stenosis has not been reached. This is one of the first population-based studies to use a dedicated administrative convention for the endovascular procedure to address whether there is a cohort of patients in whom CAS is more beneficial than carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

Methods

We analyzed in-hospital mortality, postoperative stroke, and combined postoperative stoke/mortality in 47,752 CAS or CEA hospitalizations, matched by propensity score, in discharge data sets obtained from the states of New York and California for the years 2005 to 2007. Other outcomes included postoperative complications, length of stay, and volume-outcome relationships.

Results

For symptomatic patients undergoing CAS, rates were significantly higher for in-hospital mortality (3.7% vs 1.3%) and combined stroke/mortality (8.3% vs 4.6%) compared with CEA. For asymptomatic patients, there was no statistical difference between mortality (0.6% vs 0.4%), stroke (2.0% vs 1.8%), or combined stroke/mortality (2.4% vs 1.9%) across the endovascular and open procedures, respectively. Postoperative respiratory and urinary complications as well as cranial neuropathy were more common after CEA, whereas postoperative complications, including device malfunction and hypotension, were more frequent after CAS. We did not find a volume-outcome relationship for CEA, but one did exist for CAS.

Conclusions

In symptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis, the most appropriate procedure appears to be CEA, whereas CAS appears to be a suitable minimally invasive approach for asymptomatic patients. On the basis of these results and data from recent multicenter randomized trials, the use of CAS in symptomatic patients should be approached with caution.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competition of interest: none.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

 Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.

PII: S0741-5214(10)01137-7

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.010

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 52, Issue 4 , Pages 906-913.e4, October 2010