« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 52, Issue 3
, Pages 576-583.e2
, September 2010
CAPTURE 2 risk-adjusted stroke outcome benchmarks for carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection
References
- [No authors listed] . Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445–453
- [No authors listed] Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998;351:1379–1387
- [No authors listed] . Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995;273:1421–1428
- Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1491–1502
- [No authors listed] Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2001;357:1729–1737
- Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1493–1501
- Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1572–1579
- Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:893–902
- Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3s) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:885–892
- . International carotid stenting study: protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing carotid stenting with endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;18:69–74
- http://www.nih.gov/news/health/feb2010/ninds-26.htmAccessed March 10, 2010
- Carotid stenting vs. Surgery of severe carotid artery disease and stroke prevention in asymptomatic patients (ACT I). www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00106938?term=ACT+and+stent&rank=22009;Accessed May 7, 2010
- Clinical competence statement on carotid stenting: training and credentialing for carotid stenting--multispecialty consensus recommendations: a report of the SCAI/SVMB/SVS writing committee to develop a clinical competence statement on carotid interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:165–174
- ACC/ACP/SCAI/SVMB/SVS clinical competence statement on vascular medicine and catheter-based peripheral vascular interventions: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physician Task Force on Clinical Competence (ACC/ACP/SCAI/SVMB/SVS Writing Committee to develop a clinical competence statement on peripheral vascular disease). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:941–957
- Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement (Developed by a collaborative panel of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, and the Society of Interventional Radiology). J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(9 Pt 1):1079–1093
- Training, competency, and credentialing standards for diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, carotid stenting, and cerebrovascular intervention. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:1732–1741
- The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;70:1025–1033
- . Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians: periprocedural stroke risk predictor analysis from the multicenter carotid ACCULINK/ACCUNET Post Approval Trial to Uncover Rare Events (CAPTURE 2) clinical trial. Stroke. 2010;41:757–764
- Stenting and angioplasty with protection in patients at high-risk for endarterectomy: SAPPHIRE Worldwide Registry first 2,001 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73:129–136
- Protected carotid stenting in high-risk pateints with severe carotid artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2384–2389
- . A risk score to predict ischemic lesions after protected carotid artery stenting. J Neurol Sci. 2008;273:112–115
- . Medical complications associated with carotid endarterectomy (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET)). Stroke. 1999;30:1759–1763
- . Clinical and radiographic risk factors for operative stroke and death in the European carotid stroke trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;23:108–116
- . Thirty-day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high-surgical-risk registries. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:159–166
- . GORE EMPIRE clinical trial results using the Gore flow reversal system during carotid artery stenting. Abstract presented at the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) Annual Meeting and Postgraduate Course; September 19-23, 2009; Lisbon, Portugal Cardiovascular & Interventional Radiology. 2009;32(Supplement 2):288;Abstract 1203.4
- Evaluating the use of the Fibernet embolic protection device in carotid artery stenting: The epic european study. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00309803?term=EPIC&rank=112008;Accessed May 7, 2010
- . Safety outcomes from the PROTECT carotid artery stenting multi-center study. Stroke. 2009;40:e107
Competition of interest: Dr Matsumura received research support, consultation fees, or training director fees from Abbott, Cook, EV3, Lumen, Medtronic, and WL Gore. Dr Cheng is an employee of sponsor for the clinical trial (Abbott), and Dr Gao and Dr Verta are employees of Abbott.
Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.
The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.
PII: S0741-5214(10)00811-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.064
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 52, Issue 3
, Pages 576-583.e2
, September 2010
