Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 52, Issue 2 , Pages 298-302, August 2010

The impact of radiation dose exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair on patient safety

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Ireland

Received 20 December 2009; accepted 4 March 2010.

Objective

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) exposes patients to radiation during the procedure and in subsequent follow-up. The study goal was to calculate the radiation dose in our unit and compare it against other published data and national guidelines.

Methods

All EVAR procedures were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Radiation dose, screening time, and volume of intravenous contrast during the procedure were reviewed. Radiation exposure from subsequent computed tomography (CT) imaging was included in the overall exposure. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

Results

From October 1998 to October 2008, 320 elective patients underwent EVAR. Mean screening time was 29.4 ± 23.3 minutes, and the radiation dose was 11.7 ± 7.1 mSv. The EVAR was an emergency in 64 patients. The mean screening time was 22.9 ± 18.2 minutes, and the radiation dose was 13.4 ± 8.6 mSv. During the first postoperative year, follow-up CT scans exposed the patients to 24.0 mSv, with 8.0 mSv in subsequent years. Abdominal radiographs added an additional 1.8 mSv each year.

Conclusion

EVAR and the follow-up investigations involve substantial amounts of radiation, with well-recognized carcinogenic risks. Because patient safety is paramount, radiation exposure should be minimized. This may be possible by standardizing radiation exposure throughout the United Kingdom by implementing national guidelines and considering other imaging modalities for follow-up.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competition of interest: none.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(10)00684-1

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.004

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 52, Issue 2 , Pages 298-302, August 2010