Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 52, Issue 1 , Pages 13-18, July 2010

Endovascular aneurysm repair is superior to open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in EVAR-suitable patients

  • Jan A. Ten Bosch, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Joep A.W. Teijink, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery-Vascular Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: J.A.W. Teijink, MD, PhD, Catharina Hospital, Department of Vascular Surgery, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Edith M. Willigendael, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Martin H. Prins, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology/KEMTA, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Received 7 September 2009; accepted 6 February 2010. published online 17 May 2010.

Objective

Efficacy results of endovascular repair (rEVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) compared with open surgery are based on several observational studies containing selection bias. The present study compared rEVAR with open surgery in EVAR-suitable patients with an rAAA who all underwent the same preoperative imaging protocol.

Methods

Our policy is to perform a computed tomography angiography on all patients with a suspected rAAA. rEVAR was performed when the rEVAR-vascular surgeon was on call and the patient was suitable for EVAR. Afterwards, two experienced independent blinded experts assessed all computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans on EVAR-suitability. Only EVAR-suitable patients were included in the main analyses. Outcome parameters included mortality (intraoperative, 30-day, and 6-month), complications, reinterventions, and length of hospital stay.

Results

From April 2002 until March 2008, 132 consecutive patients with suspected rAAAs were presented. Preoperative CTA confirmed rAAA in 104 patients, of whom 25 underwent rEVAR, and 79 underwent open surgery. In retrospect, the 25 rEVAR patients and 33 patients in the open group were judged EVAR-suitable by the experts. At baseline, there was an equal distribution of physiologic and anatomic characteristics as well as comorbidity. In EVAR-suitable patients, the intraoperative, 30-day, and 6-month mortality was 4.0% (1 of 25), 20.0% (5 of 25), and 28.0% (7 of 25) after rEVAR compared with 6.1% (2 of 33; P >.99), 45.5% (15 of 33; P = .04), and 54.5% (18 of 33; P = .04) after open surgery, respectively. Median length of hospital stay was 9.5 days (interquartile range, 5.0-20.5) after rEVAR and 17.0 days (interquartile range, 9.5-28.0) after open surgery (P = .03).

Conclusions

In EVAR-suitable patients, an absolute perioperative mortality reduction of 25.5% of rEVAR over open surgery was found, which was still present at 6 months of follow-up. These data suggest that rEVAR is a superior treatment option for EVAR-suitable patients with an rAAA compared with an open surgery.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competition of interest: none.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(10)00309-5

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.014

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 52, Issue 1 , Pages 13-18, July 2010