« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 4,
Supplement
, Pages S9-S13
, April 2010
Gender trends in the repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms and outcomes
References
- . Surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: early and late results of a prospective study by the AURC in 1989. Ann Vasc Surg. 1997;11:90–99
- Vohra R, Reid D, Groome J, Abdool-Carrim A, Pollock J. Long-term survival in patients undergoing resection of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg;4:460-5.
- . National trends in the repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2008;8:1101–1107
- Trends, complications, and mortality in peripheral vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:205–216
- . Arterial vascular disease in women. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:1295–1302
- . A decade of change in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States: have we improved outcomes equally between men and women?. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:230–238
- . The influence of gender on outcome after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:258–262
- . Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm prevalence. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:561–568
- . Predictors of repair and effect of gender on treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:784–787
- . Influence of gender on outcome from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. [see comment] Br J Surg. 2000;87:191–194
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women: prevalence, risk for screening. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:630–635
- . Influence of sex on the results of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 1994;20:914–923discussion 23-6
- . Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:122–126
- . Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1445–1452
- . Ultrasound measurement of the luminal diameter of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in patients without vascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:596–601
- . Thoracic and abdominal aortic dimension in 70-year-old men and women—a population-based whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:504–512
- Anatomic characteristics of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm on conventional CT scans: implications for rupture risk. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:1243–1252
- . Diameter and compliance in the human common carotid artery—variations with age and se. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21:1–9
- . Comparative effects of aging in men and women on the properties of the arterial tree. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1374–1380
- Gender-related differences in the tensile strength of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1085:400–402
- . Female gender attenuates cytokine and chemokine expression and leukocyte recruitment in experimental rodent abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1085:367–379
- . Trends in mortality and hospital admission rates for abdominal aortic aneurysm in England and Wales, 1979-1999. Br J Surg. 2005;92:968–975
- . Hospital vascular surgery volume and procedure mortality in California 1982-1994. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28:45–56discussion 8
- . Aortic aneurysmal disease in women (Is there a greater). Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1996;800:256–257
- . Hospital volume, calendar age, and short term outcomes in. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996;50:207–213
- The accuracy of Medicare's hospital claims data: progress has been made, but problems remain. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:243–248
- . A model to predict outcomes for endovascular aneurysm variables. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;35:571–579
- . Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: recommendation statement. [see comment] Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:198–202
- Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a consensus statement. JVS. 2004;39:267–269
- . Gender differences in relative dilatation of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;20:564–568
Competition of interest: none.
The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.
PII: S0741-5214(09)02337-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.129
© 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 4,
Supplement
, Pages S9-S13
, April 2010
