Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 4 , Pages 842-849, April 2010

Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of renal artery aneurysms

  • Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Ill
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti, MD, Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S. Wood St., Ste. 435 E, Chicago, Illinois 60612
  • ,
  • Francesco Maria Bianco, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • Pietro Addeo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • Antonella Lombardi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
  • ,
  • Andrea Coratti, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
  • ,
  • Fabio Sbrana, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Ill

Received 28 July 2009; accepted 8 October 2009. published online 04 January 2010.

Objective

The aim of this article is to report our experience in the repair of renal artery aneurysms using robot-assisted surgery.

Methods

Between December 2002 and March 2009, five women with a mean age of 63.8 years (range, 57-78 years) underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of renal artery aneurysms by the same surgeon at two different institutions, the Department of General Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy (three patients) and the Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery at the University of Illinois, Chicago (two patients). The mean size of the lesions was 19.4 mm (range, 9-28 mm). Four of the lesions were complex aneurysms involving the renal artery bifurcation. Two patients were symptomatic and three had hypertension. In situ repair by aneurysmectomy was performed in all cases, followed by revascularization. In complex aneurysms, an autologous saphenous vein graft was used for the reconstruction.

Results

The mean operative time was 288 minutes (range, 170-360 min) and the estimated surgical blood loss was 100 ml (range, 50-300 ml). Warm ischemia time was 10 minutes in the patient treated by aneurysmectomy, followed by direct reconstruction. The average warm ischemia time was 38.5 minutes (range, 20-60 min) for patients treated with saphenous vein graft interposition. The mean time to resume a regular diet was 1.6 days (range, 1-2 days). The mean postoperative length of hospital stay was 5.6 days (range, 3-7 days). No postoperative morbidity was noted. The mean follow-up time for the entire series was 28 months (range, 6-48 months). Color Doppler ultrasonography examination showed patency in all reconstructed vessels. One patient had stenosis of one of the reconstructed branches, which was treated with percutaneous angioplasty.

Conclusions

Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of renal artery aneurysms is feasible, safe and effective. The technical advantages of the robotic system allows for microvascular reconstruction to be performed using a minimally invasive approach, even in complex cases. This approach may also allow for improved postoperative recovery and reduce the morbidity correlated with open repair of renal artery aneurysms. Although more experience and technical refinements are necessary, robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of renal artery aneurysms represents a valid alternative to open surgery.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competition of interest: none.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(09)02251-4

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.104

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 4 , Pages 842-849, April 2010