Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 3 , Pages 584-591.e3, March 2010

Comparative study on carotid revascularization (endarterectomy vs stenting) using markers of cellular brain injury, neuropsychometric tests, and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

Presented at the 2009 Vascular Annual Meeting, Denver, Colo, Jun 11-14, 2009.

  • Laura Capoccia, MD

      Affiliations

    • Vascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery “Paride Stefanini,” Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Laura Capoccia, Via Antonio Labranca 44, 00123 Rome, Italy
    • ,
  • Francesco Speziale, MD

      Affiliations

    • Vascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery “Paride Stefanini,” Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
    • ,
  • Marianna Gazzetti, MD

      Affiliations

    • Vascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery “Paride Stefanini,” Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
    • ,
  • Paola Mariani, MD

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Pathology Division, Department of Surgery “Paride Stefanini,” Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
    • ,
  • Annarita Rizzo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Vascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery “Paride Stefanini,” Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
    • ,
  • Wassim Mansour, MD

      Affiliations

    • Vascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery “Paride Stefanini,” Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
    • ,
  • Enrico Sbarigia, MD

      Affiliations

    • Vascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery “Paride Stefanini,” Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
    • ,
  • Paolo Fiorani, MD

      Affiliations

    • Vascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery “Paride Stefanini,” Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy

Received 31 May 2009; accepted 4 October 2009. published online 04 January 2010.

Objective

Subclinical alterations of cerebral function can occur during or after carotid revascularization and can be detected by a variety of standard tests. This comparative study assessed the relationship among serum levels for two biochemical markers of cerebral injury, postoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), and neuropsychometric testing in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) for high-grade asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Methods

Forty-three consecutive asymptomatic patients underwent carotid revascularization by endarterectomy (CEA, 20) or stenting (CAS, 23). They were evaluated with DW-MRI and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) test preoperatively and ≤24 hours after carotid revascularization. Venous blood samples to assess serum levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100β protein were collected for each patient preoperatively and five times in a 24-hour period postoperatively and assayed using automated commercial equipment. The MMSE test was repeated at 6 months. The relationship between serum marker levels and neuropsychometric and imaging tests and differences between the two groups of patients were analyzed by χ2 test, with significance at P < .05.

Results

No transient ischemic attacks or strokes were clinically observed. CAS caused more new subcortical lesions at postoperative DW-MRI and a significant decline in the MMSE postoperative score compared with CEA (P = .03). In CAS patients, new lesions at DW-MRI were significantly associated with a postoperative MMSE score decline >5 points (P = .001). Analysis of S100β and NSE levels showed a significant increase at 24 hours in CAS patients compared with CEA patients (P = .02). The MMSE score at 6 months showed a nonsignificant increase vs the postoperative score in both groups.

Conclusions

Biochemical markers measurements of brain damage combined with neuropsychometric tests and DW-MRI can be used to evaluate silent injuries after CAS. The mechanisms of rise in S100β and NSE levels at 24 hours after CAS may be due to increased perioperative microembolization rather than to hypoperfusion. Further studies are required to assess the clinical significance of those tests in carotid revascularization.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competition of interest: none.

 Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(09)02133-8

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.079

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 3 , Pages 584-591.e3, March 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution