Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 3 , Pages 565-571, March 2010

Trends and outcomes of endovascular and open treatment for traumatic thoracic aortic injury

  • Frederik H.W. Jonker, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery and Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Frederik H. W. Jonker, MD, Yale University School of Medicine, 367 Cedar Street, Room 1110, New Haven CT 06510
  • ,
  • Jeannine K. Giacovelli, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Bart E. Muhs, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery and Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn
  • ,
  • Julie Ann Sosa, MA, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery and Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn
  • ,
  • Jeffrey E. Indes, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery and Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn

Received 5 July 2009; accepted 3 October 2009. published online 04 January 2010.

Objectives

Traumatic thoracic aortic injury (TTAI) is associated with high mortality rates. Data supporting thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to reduce mortality and morbidity for TTAI is limited to small series and meta-analyses. In this study, we evaluated the trends and outcomes of open surgery and TEVAR for TTAI in New York State.

Methods

All cases of TTAI in New York State between 2000 and 2007 were extracted from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database. A diagnosis by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision coding of TTAI was required for inclusion.

Results

We identified 328 patients with TTAI who underwent surgical repair in New York State between 2000 and 2007; mean age of the cohort was 39.3 years ± 18 years; 80% were male. Open repair of TTAI was performed in 79.6% and 20.4% underwent TEVAR. Open repair was performed for all cases of TTAI until the introduction of TEVAR in 2005; TEVAR exceeded the use of open repair for TTAI in 2006 and 2007. Additional major injuries were present in 71.7% in the open repair group vs 91.0% of the TEVAR group (P = .001). The overall in-hospital mortality rate for the 8-year period was significantly increased after open repair of TTAI compared with TEVAR: 17% vs 6%, (odds ratio [OR] 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-9.23; P = .024). After controlling for the significant covariates, TEVAR independently reduced the risk of death following surgical intervention for TTAI compared with the open procedure (OR 3.8, 95% CI, 1.28-10.99; P = .010). Respiratory complications were the most common postoperative morbidity, and were significantly increased after open repair: 38% vs 24% (OR 1.95; 95% CI, 1.05-3.60; P = .032). There were no significant differences in cardiac complications, acute renal failure (ARF), paraplegia, or stroke. Endoleak and distal embolization each occurred in 9% of patients after TEVAR.

Conclusions

There has been a shift toward endovascular management of patients with TTAI. This change in surgical strategy has been associated with less postoperative mortality and fewer pulmonary complications in patients suffering from TTAI. TEVAR is associated with significant device-related complications.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competition of interest: none.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(09)02096-5

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.046

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 3 , Pages 565-571, March 2010