Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 3 , Pages 616-621.e3, March 2010

Blood transfusion is associated with increased morbidity and mortality after lower extremity revascularization

Presented at the 2009 Vascular Annual Meeting, Denver, Colo, June 11-14, 2009.

  • Shane D. O'Keeffe, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Ky
  • ,
  • Daniel L. Davenport, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Ky
  • ,
  • David J. Minion, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Ky
  • ,
  • Ehab E. Sorial, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Ky
  • ,
  • Eric D. Endean, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Ky
  • ,
  • Eleftherios Sarantis Xenos, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Ky
    • VA Medical Center, Lexington, Ky
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Eleftherios S. Xenos, MD, PhD, University of Kentucky Medical Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536

Received 2 July 2009; accepted 3 October 2009. published online 28 January 2010.

Background

Little is known about the significance of blood transfusion in patients with peripheral arterial disease. We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database to examine the effect of intraoperative blood transfusion on the morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent lower extremity revascularization.

Methods

We analyzed data from the participant use data file containing vascular surgical cases submitted to the ACS NSQIP in 2005, 2006, and 2007 by 173 hospitals. Current procedural terminology codes were used to select lower extremity procedures that were grouped into venous graft, prosthetic graft, or thromboendarterectomy. Thirty-day outcomes analyzed were (1) mortality, (2) composite morbidity, (3) graft/prosthesis failure, (4) return to the operating room within 30 days, (5) wound occurrences, (6) sepsis or septic shock, (7) pulmonary occurrences, and (8) renal insufficiency or failure. Intraoperative transfusion of packed red blood cells was categorized as none, 1 to 2 units, and 3 or more units. Outcome rates were compared between the transfused and nontransfused groups using the χ2 test and multivariable regression adjusting for transfusion propensity, comorbid and procedural risk.

Results

A total of 8799 patients underwent lower extremity revascularization between 2005 and 2007. Mean age was 66.8 ± 12.0 years and 5569 (63.3%) were male. Transfusion rates ranged from 14.5% in thromboendarterectomy patients to 27.1% in prosthetic bypass patients (P < .05). After adjustment for transfusion propensity and patient and procedural risks, transfusion of 1 or 2 units remained significantly predictive of mortality, composite morbidity, sepsis/shock, pulmonary occurrences, and return to the operating room. The adjusted odds ratios for 30-day mortality ranged from 1.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-2.70) for 1 to 2 units to 2.48 (95% CI 1.55-3.98) for 3 or more units.

Conclusion

In a large number of patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization, we have found that there is a higher risk of postoperative mortality, pulmonary, and infectious complications after receiving intraoperative blood transfusion. Additional studies are necessary to better define transfusion triggers that balance the risk/benefit ratio for blood transfusion.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competition of interest: none.

 Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(09)02095-3

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.045

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 3 , Pages 616-621.e3, March 2010