Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 1 , Pages 174-183, January 2010

The fate of an endothelium layer after preconditioning

Presented at the Southern Association for Vascular Surgery Meeting 2009, Tucson, Ariz, Jan 14-17, 2009.

  • Saami K. Yazdani, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winson-Salem, NC
    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winson-Salem, NC
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Saami K. Yazdani, PhD, CVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD 20878
  • ,
  • Bryan W. Tillman, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winson-Salem, NC
    • Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winson-Salem, NC
  • ,
  • Joel L. Berry, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winson-Salem, NC
  • ,
  • Shay Soker, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winson-Salem, NC
  • ,
  • Randolph L. Geary, MD

      Affiliations

    • Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winson-Salem, NC
    • Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winson-Salem, NC

Received 2 February 2009; accepted 15 August 2009.

Background

A strategy in minimizing thrombotic events of vascular constructs is to seed the luminal surface with autologous endothelial cells (ECs). The task of seeding ECs can be achieved via bioreactors, which induce mechanical forces (shear stress, strain, pressure) onto the ECs. Although bioreactors can achieve a confluent layer of ECs in vitro, their acute response to blood remains unclear. Moreover, the necessary mechanical conditions that will increase EC adhesion and function remain unclear. We hypothesize that preconditioning seeded endothelium under physiological flow will enhance their retention and function.

Objective

To determine the role of varying preconditioning protocols on seeded ECs in vitro and in vivo.

Methods

Scaffolds derived from decelluarized arteries seeded with autologous ECs were preconditioned for 9 days. Three specific protocols, low steady shear stress (SS), high SS, and cyclic SS were investigated. After preconditioning, the seeded grafts were exposed to 15 minutes of blood via an ex vivo arteriovenous shunt model or alternately an in vivo arteriovenous bypass graft model.

Results

The shunt model demonstrated ECs remained intact for all conditions. In the arteriovenous bypass model, only the cyclic preconditioned grafts remained intact, maintained morphology, and resisted the attachment of circulating blood elements such as platelets, red blood cells, and leukocytes. Western blotting analysis demonstrated an increase in the protein expression of eNOS and prostaglandin I synthase for the cyclic high shear stress-conditioned cells relative to cells conditioned with high shear stress alone.

Conclusion

Cyclic preconditioning has been shown here to increase the ECs ability to resist blood flow-induced shear stress and the attachment of circulating blood elements, key attributes in minimizing thrombotic events. These studies may ultimately establish protocols for the formation of a more durable endothelial monolayer that may be useful in the context of small vessel arterial reconstruction.

Clinical Relevance

The importance of ECs toward patency has been demonstrated by the superior performance of endothelialized vein compared with prosthetic vascular graft materials. This article evaluates conditioning protocols for bioengineered vascular conduits to improve endothelial retention. This study describes approaches to improve bioengineered vessels as a potential alternative to conventional prosthetic vascular grafts.

 

 Competition of interest: none.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(09)01794-7

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.074

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 1 , Pages 174-183, January 2010