Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 1 , Pages 65-70 , January 2010

Detection of common carotid artery stenosis using duplex ultrasonography: A validation study with computed tomographic angiography

  • David P. Slovut, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, North Shore Medical Center, Salem, Mass
    • Massachusetts General Hospital Vascular Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
  • ,
  • Javier M. Romero, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neuroradiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
  • ,
  • Kathleen M. Hannon, RN, MS

      Affiliations

    • Massachusetts General Hospital Vascular Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
  • ,
  • James Dick, BS

      Affiliations

    • Massachusetts General Hospital Vascular Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
  • ,
  • Michael R. Jaff, DO

      Affiliations

    • Massachusetts General Hospital Vascular Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Michael R. Jaff, DO, Medical Director, Vascular Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114

Received 12 June 2009 ,Accepted 1 August 2009.

References 

  1. Paukovits TM, Haasz J, Molnar A, Szeberin Z, Nemes B, Varga D, et al. Transfemoral endovascular treatment of proximal common carotid artery lesions: a single-center experience on 153 lesions. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:80–87
  2. Diethrich EB, Ndiaye M, Reid DB. Stenting in the carotid artery: initial experience in 110 patients. J Endovasc Surg. 1996;3:42–62
  3. Nederkoorn PJ, Mali WP, Eikelboom BC, Elgersma OE, Buskens E, Hunink MG, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing. Stroke. 2002;33:2003–2008
  4. Blakeley DD, Oddone EZ, Hasselblad V, Simel DL, Matchar DB. Noninvasive carotid artery testing (A meta-analytic review). Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:360–367
  5. Huston J, James EM, Brown RD, Lefsrud RD, Ilstrup DM, Robertson EF, et al. Redefined duplex ultrasonographic criteria for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:1133–1140
  6. Koelemay MJ, Nederkoorn PJ, Reitsma JB, Majoie CB. Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke. 2004;35:2306–2312
  7. Akers DL, Markowitz IA, Kerstein MD. The value of aortic arch study in the evaluation of cerebrovascular insufficiency. Am J Surg. 1987;154:230–232
  8. Kadwa AM, Robbs JV, Abdool-Carrim AT. Aortic arch angiography prior to carotid endarterectomy (Is its continued use justified?). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;13:527–530
  9. Berguer R, Morasch MD, Kline RA. Transthoracic repair of innominate and common carotid artery disease: immediate and long-term outcome for 100 consecutive surgical reconstructions. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:34–41discussion 42
  10. Berguer R, Morasch MD, Kline RA, Kazmers A, Friedland MS. Cervical reconstruction of the supra-aortic trunks: a 16-year experience. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29:239–246discussion 46-8
  11. Shaalan WE, Wahlgren CM, Desai T, Piano G, Skelly C, Bassiouny HS. Reappraisal of velocity criteria for carotid bulb/internal carotid artery stenosis utilizing high-resolution B-mode ultrasound validated with computed tomography angiography. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:104–112discussion 12-3
  12. Modaresi KB, Cox TC, Summers PE, Jarosz JM, Verma H, Taylor PR, et al. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis. Br J Surg. 1999;86:1422–1426
  13. AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Strickler DL, Alberts S, Young L. Proposed new duplex classification for threshold stenoses used in various symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials. Ann Vasc Surg. 1998;12:349–358
  14. Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Chitwood RW, Taylor LM, Lee RW, Cummings CA, et al. Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:152–157discussion 157-9
  15. McLaren JT, Donaghue CC, Drezner AD. Accuracy of carotid duplex examination to predict proximal and intrathoracic lesions. Am J Surg. 1996;172:149–150
  16. Lee VS, Hertzberg BS, Workman MJ, Smith TP, Kliewer MA, DeLong DM, et al. Variability of Doppler US measurements along the common carotid artery: effects on estimates of internal carotid arterial stenosis in patients with angiographically proved disease. Radiology. 2000;214:387–392
  17. Meyer JI, Khalil RM, Obuchowski NA, Baus LK. Common carotid artery: variability of Doppler US velocity measurements. Radiology. 1997;204:339–341
  18. Hansen F, Mangell P, Sonesson B, Lanne T. Diameter and compliance in the human common carotid artery--variations with age and sex. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21:1–9
  19. Benetos A, Simon A, Levenson J, Lagneau P, Bouthier J, Safar M. Pulsed Doppler: an evaluation of diameter, blood velocity and blood flow of the common carotid artery in patients with isolated unilateral stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Stroke. 1985;16:969–972
  20. Kamouchi M, Kishikawa K, Okada Y, Inoue T, Ibayashi S, Iida M. Reappraisal of flow velocity ratio in common carotid artery to predict hemodynamic change in carotid stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:957–962
  21. Chang YJ, Lin SK, Ryu SJ, Wai YY. Common carotid artery occlusion: evaluation with duplex sonography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16:1099–1105
  22. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 1978;8:283–298
  23. Clevert DA, Johnson T, Michaely H, Jung EM, Flach PM, Strautz TI, et al. High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: comparison of high-resolution contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2006;60:379–386
  24. Cinat ME, Casalme C, Wilson SE, Pham H, Anderson P. Computed tomography angiography validates duplex sonographic evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Am Surg. 2003;69:842–847
  25. van Prehn J, Muhs BE, Pramanik B, Ollenschleger M, Rockman CB, Cayne NS, et al. Multidimensional characterization of carotid artery stenosis using CT imaging: a comparison with ultrasound grading and peak flow measurement. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36:267–272
  26. Anderson GB, Ashforth R, Steinke DE, Ferdinandy R, Findlay JM. CT angiography for the detection and characterization of carotid artery bifurcation disease. Stroke. 2000;31:2168–2174
  27. Berg M, Zhang Z, Ikonen A, Sipola P, Kalviainen R, Manninen H, et al. Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of carotid artery disease in symptomatic patients: comparison with rotational angiography and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1022–1034
  28. Josephson SA, Bryant SO, Mak HK, Johnston SC, Dillon WP, Smith WS. Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology. 2004;63:457–460
  29. Zhang Z, Berg M, Ikonen A, Kononen M, Kalviainen R, Manninen H, et al. Carotid stenosis degree in CT angiography: assessment based on luminal area versus luminal diameter measurements. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:2359–2365

 Competition of interest: none.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(09)01614-0

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.002

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 1 , Pages 65-70 , January 2010