Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 50, Issue 4 , Pages 953-956 , October 2009

Surgical or endovascular repair of thrombosed dialysis vascular access: Is there any evidence?

  • Jan H.M. Tordoir, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Dr J. H. M. Tordoir, Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P Debyelaan 25, 6202 AZ Maastricht
  • ,
  • Aron S. Bode, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Noud Peppelenbosch, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Frank M. van der Sande, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Michiel W. de Haan, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Received 28 June 2009 ,Accepted 30 June 2009.

References 

  1. Green LD, Lee DS, Kucey DS. A metaanalysis comparing surgical thrombectomy, mechanical thrombectomy, and pharmacomechanical thrombolysis for thrombosed dialysis grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:939–945
  2. Schuman E, Quinn S, Standage B, Gross G. Thrombolysis versus thrombectomy for occluded hemodalisis grafts. Am J Surg. 1994;167:473–476
  3. Uflacker R, Rajagopalan PR, Vujic I, Stutley JE. Treatment of thrombosed dialysis access grafts: randomized trial of surgical thrombectomy versus mechanical thrombectomy with the Amplatz device. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996;7:185–192
  4. Vesely TM, Williams D, Weiss M, Hicks M, Stainken B, Matalon T, et al. Comparison of the angiojet rheolytic catheter to surgical thrombectomy for the treatment of thrombosed hemodialysis grafts (Peripheral AngioJet Clinical Trial). J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10:1195–1205
  5. Vesely TM, Idso MC, Audrain J, Windus DW, Lowell JA. Thrombolysis versus surgical thrombectomy for the treatment of dialysis graft thrombosis: pilot study comparing costs. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996;7:507–512
  6. Marston WA, Criado E, Jaques PF, Mauro MA, Burnham SJ, Keagy BA. Prospective randomized comparison of surgical versus endovascular management of thrombosed dialysis access grafts. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:373–380
  7. Dougherty MJ, Calligaro KD, Schindler N, Raviola CA, Ntoso A. Endovascular versus surgical treatment for thrombosed hemodialysis grafts: A prospective, randomized study. J Vasc Surg. 1999;30:1016–1023
  8. Uflacker R, Rajagopalan PR, Selby JB, Hannegan C Investigators of the Clinical Trial Sponsored by Microvena Corporation. Thrombosed dialysis access grafts: randomized comparison of the Amplatz thrombectomy device and surgical thromboembolectomy. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:2009–2014
  9. Sofocleous CT, Hinrichs CR, Weiss SH, Contractor D, Barone A, Bahramipour P, et al. Alteplase for hemodialysis access graft thrombolysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13:775–784
  10. Bittl JA, Feldman RL. Prospective assessment of hemodialysis access patency after percutaneous intervention: Cox proportional hazards analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;66:309–315
  11. Bakken AM, Galaria II, Agerstrand C, Saad WE, Surowiec SM, Singh MJ, et al. Percutaneous therapy to maintain dialysis access successfully prolongs functional duration after primary failure. Ann Vasc Surg. 2007;21:474–480
  12. Kakkos SK, Haddad GK, Haddad JA, Scully MM. Secondary patency of thrombosed prosthetic vascular access grafts with aggressive surveillance, monitoring and endovascular management. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36:356–365
  13. Liu YH, Hung YN, Hsieh HC, Ko PJ. Surgical thrombectomy for thrombosed dialysis grafts: comparison of adjunctive treatments. World J Surg. 2008;32:241–245
  14. Turmel-Rodrigues L, Pengloan J, Rodrigue H, Brillet G, Lataste A, Pierre D, et al. Treatment of failed native arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis by interventional radiology. Kidney Int. 2000;57:1124–1140
  15. Haage P, Vorwerk D, Wildberger JE, Piroth W, Schürmann K, Günther RW. Percutaneous treatment of thrombosed primary arteriovenous hemodialysis access fistulae. Kidney Int. 2000;57:1169–1175
  16. Schon D, Mishler R. Salvage of occluded autologous arteriovenous fistulae. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;36:804–810
  17. Shatsky JB, Berns JS, Clark TW, Kwak A, Tuite CM, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, et al. Single-center experience with the Arrow-Trerotola Percutaneous Thrombectomy Device in the management of thrombosed native dialysis fistulas. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16:1605–1611
  18. Moossavi S, Regan JD, Pierson ED, Kasey JM, Tuttle AB, Vachharajani TJ, et al. Non-surgical salvage of thrombosed arterio-venous fistulae: a case series and review of the literature. Semin Dial. 2007;20:459–464
  19. Ponikvar R. Surgical salvage of thrombosed arteriovenous fistulas and grafts. Ther Apher Dial. 2005;9:245–249
  20. Georgiadis GS, Lazarides MK, Lambidis CD, Panagoutsos SA, Kostakis AG, Bastounis EA, et al. Use of short PTFE segments (<6 cm) compares favorably with pure autologous repair in failing or thrombosed native arteriovenous fistulas. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41:76–81
  21. Lipari G, Tessitore N, Poli A, Bedogna V, Impedovo A, Lupo A, et al. Outcomes of surgical revision of stenosed and thrombosed forearm arteriovenous fistulae for haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22:2605–2612

PII: S0741-5214(09)01364-0

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.058

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 50, Issue 4 , Pages 953-956 , October 2009