Journal Home
Search for

Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages 1500-1510 (December 2009)


View previous. 48 of 110 View next.

Current evidence and clinical implications of aspirin resistance

George Kasotakis, MDa, Iraklis I. Pipinos, MDb, Thomas G. Lynch, MDbCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 20 March 2009; accepted 14 June 2009. published online 13 August 2009.

Atherothrombosis, characterized by atherosclerotic plaque rupture and subsequent occlusive or subocclusive thrombus formation is the primary cause of acute ischemic syndromes involving all vascular beds and accounts for more than one-third of all deaths in the developed world. Platelet activation and aggregation constitute the most critical component in the pathophysiology of atherothrombotic disease. Aspirin is currently the most commonly used antiplatelet agent and one of the most frequently prescribed drugs, with as many as 30 million Americans on chronic aspirin regimens. Multiple well-designed prospective randomized clinical trials have demonstrated aspirin's efficacy in both primary and secondary prevention of a wide variety of entities that the atherothrombotic disease spectrum encompasses, such as cerebrovascular, coronary artery, and peripheral vascular disease. Despite its proven benefit, however, a growing body of evidence suggests that up to 70% of aspirin-takers may still be at risk for atherothrombotic complications due to resistance. Patients with laboratory-confirmed aspirin resistance seem to have an almost fourfold increase in their risk for acute thrombotic episodes, which underlines the magnitude of the problem for the vascular specialist. In this article, we review the physiology of platelet activation and the role of aspirin as an antiplatelet agent; the various laboratory assays used in assessing aspirin effectiveness; and current data on aspirin resistance and its clinical implications in patients with cardiovascular disease. We also review the studies that explore this phenomenon in patients with peripheral arterial disease and discuss the optimal management options in aspirin-resistant individuals. Suggestions are advanced for the direction of future trials evaluating aspirin resistance in patients with vascular disease.

Richard P. Cambria, MD, Section Editor

a Department Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Neb

b Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Neb

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Thomas G. Lynch, MD, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Surgery, 983280 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-3280

 Competition of interest: none.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(09)01334-2

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.023


View previous. 48 of 110 View next.