Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 50, Issue 5 , Pages 1040-1048 , November 2009

Comparative effectiveness of carotid arterial stenting versus endarterectomy

  • Peter W. Groeneveld, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa
    • Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa
    • Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Peter W. Groeneveld, MD, MS, 1229 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021
  • ,
  • Lin Yang, MS

      Affiliations

    • Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa
  • ,
  • Alexis Greenhut, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa
  • ,
  • Feifei Yang, MS

      Affiliations

    • Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa

Received 20 February 2009 ,Accepted 22 May 2009.

References 

  1. [No authors listed] Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998;351:1379–1387
  2. Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Ferguson GG, Haynes RB, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators). N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1415–1425
  3. Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Fox AJ, Taylor DW, Mayberg MR, et al. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet. 2003;361:107–116
  4. Chaturvedi S, Bruno A, Feasby T, Holloway R, Benavente O, Cohen SN, et al. Carotid endarterectomy–an evidence-based review: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2005;65:794–801
  5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. ACCULINK and RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System - P040012. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/mda/docs/p040012.htmlAccessed September 26, 2008.
  6. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1493–1501
  7. CaRESS Steering Committee. Carotid Revascularization Using Endarterectomy or Stenting Systems (CaRESS) phase I clinical trial: 1-year results. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:213–219
  8. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, Branchereau A, Moulin T, Becquemin JP, et al. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1660–1671
  9. Eckstein HH, Ringleb P, Allenberg JR, Berger J, Fraedrich G, Hacke W, et al. Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:893–902
  10. Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, Bajwa TK, et al. Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1572–1579
  11. Malenka DJ, Kaplan AV, Lucas FL, Sharp SM, Skinner JS. Outcomes following coronary stenting in the era of bare-metal vs the era of drug-eluting stents. JAMA. 2008;299:2868–2876
  12. Hobson RW, Howard VJ, Brott TG, Howard G, Roubin GS, Ferguson RD CREST Executive Committee. Organizing the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST): National Institutes of Health, Health Care Financing Administration, and industry funding. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2001;2:160–164
  13. Featherstone RL, Brown MM, Coward LJ ICSS Investigators. International carotid stenting study: protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing carotid stenting with endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis (Basel, Switzerland). 2004;18:69–74
  14. Wennberg DE, Lucas FL, Birkmeyer JD, Bredenberg CE, Fisher ES. Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population: trial hospitals, volume, and patient characteristics. JAMA. 1998;279:1278–1281
  15. Phurrough S, Salive M, Hogarth R, Chin J. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services CAG #00085R: Coverage Decision Memorandum for Carotid Arterial Stenting. 2005;
  16. Wooldridge JM. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. In: Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2002;p. 283–284
  17. Parker T. Measuring rurality: rural-urban continuum codes (United States Department of Agriculture). http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/rurality/ruralurbcon/Accessed September 30, 2008.
  18. Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences - Dartmouth Medical School. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. www.dartmouthatlas.orgAccessed January 4, 2006.
  19. Rosenbaum PR. Observational Studies (Springer series in statistics). In: 2nd ed.. New York: Springer; 2002;p. 295–322
  20. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Stat. 1985;39:33–38
  21. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27
  22. Browner WS, Newman TB. Are all significant P values created equal? (The analogy between diagnostic tests and clinical research). JAMA. 1987;257:2459–2463

 Competition of interest: none.

PII: S0741-5214(09)01190-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.05.054

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 50, Issue 5 , Pages 1040-1048 , November 2009