Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 50, Issue 4 , Pages 813-819.e1 , October 2009

Restenosis after renal artery angioplasty and stenting: Incidence and risk factors

Presented at the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the Southern Association of Vascular Surgery, Tucson, Ariz, Jan 14, 2009.

  • Matthew A. Corriere, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
  • ,
  • Matthew S. Edwards, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
  • ,
  • Jeffrey D. Pearce, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
  • ,
  • Jeanette S. Andrews, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
  • ,
  • Randolph L. Geary, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
  • ,
  • Kimberley J. Hansen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Kimberley J. Hansen, MD, Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1095

Received 10 January 2009 ,Accepted 12 May 2009.

  • Image Result

    Validation of peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≥180 cm/s as indicator of renal artery restenosis. The horizontal dashed line indicates PSV of 180 cm/s, and the vertical dashed line indicates angiography-d

    Validation of peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≥180 cm/s as indicator of renal artery restenosis. The horizontal dashed line indicates PSV of 180 cm/s, and the vertical dashed line indicates angiography-defined stenosis of 60%. In our own institutional cohort, significant agreement was observed between PSV ≥180 cm/s and angiographic stenosis ≥60% (κ = 0.6; P = .05).

  • Image Result
    Estimated restenosis-free survival. The estimation method accounts for the correlated data. The standard error of the survival estimate is <0.1 for the displayed postintervention interval.

    Estimated restenosis-free survival. The estimation method accounts for the correlated data. The standard error of the survival estimate is <0.1 for the displayed postintervention interval.

  • Image Result
    Time to restenosis stratified by statin medication use. Estimation method accounts for correlated data. Line becomes broken when the standard error of the survival estimate is > 0.1.

    Time to restenosis stratified by statin medication use. Estimation method accounts for correlated data. Line becomes broken when the standard error of the survival estimate is > 0.1.

 Dr Edwards is supported by the American Vascular Association and Lifeline Foundation Research Career Development Award. Grant support was also provided by The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health to Dr Edwards (Grant 1K23HL083981-01), Dr Geary (Grant R01 HL57557), and Dr Hansen (Grant 5K12HL083763-02).

 Competition of interest: none.

 Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.

PII: S0741-5214(09)01031-3

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.05.019

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 50, Issue 4 , Pages 813-819.e1 , October 2009