Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 50, Issue 2 , Pages 263-268 , August 2009

Abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter: A comparison of ultrasound measurements with those from standard and three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction

Received 14 January 2009 ,Accepted 28 February 2009.

  • Image Result

    Differing diameter measurements according to axis. Clockwise from left: maximum anteroposterior, maximum ellipse and perpendicular to maximum ellipse, perpendicular to the centerline of flow, and thre

    Differing diameter measurements according to axis. Clockwise from left: maximum anteroposterior, maximum ellipse and perpendicular to maximum ellipse, perpendicular to the centerline of flow, and three-dimensional reconstruction along the axis of the centerline of flow.

  • Image Result
    Correlation between computed tomography (CT) anteroposterior (AP) measurement and ultrasound AP measurement. Correlation coefficient was 0.91.

    Correlation between computed tomography (CT) anteroposterior (AP) measurement and ultrasound AP measurement. Correlation coefficient was 0.91.

  • Image Result
    Bland-Altman plots illustrate the bias towards smaller mean diameter measurements for AP ultrasound (US) when compared with computed tomography (CT) in different planes (A) anteroposterior (AP) (B) ma

    Bland-Altman plots illustrate the bias towards smaller mean diameter measurements for AP ultrasound (US) when compared with computed tomography (CT) in different planes (A) anteroposterior (AP) (B) maximum ellipse (ME), (C) perpendicular to the centerline of flow (PCLF), (D) perpendicular to the maximum ellipse (PME). Differences between CT measurements are also shown in (E) CT-AP vs CT-PCLF and (F) CT PCLF vs CT PME. Note that the x-axis range varies between plots.

 Competition of interest: none.

PII: S0741-5214(09)00610-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.02.243

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 50, Issue 2 , Pages 263-268 , August 2009