« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 50, Issue 2
, Pages
263-268
, August 2009
Abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter: A comparison of ultrasound measurements with those from standard and three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction
-
Differing diameter measurements according to axis. Clockwise from left: maximum anteroposterior, maximum ellipse and perpendicular to maximum ellipse, perpendicular to the centerline of flow, and thre
Differing diameter measurements according to axis. Clockwise from left: maximum anteroposterior, maximum ellipse and perpendicular to maximum ellipse, perpendicular to the centerline of flow, and three-dimensional reconstruction along the axis of the centerline of flow.
-
Bland-Altman plots illustrate the bias towards smaller mean diameter measurements for AP ultrasound (US) when compared with computed tomography (CT) in different planes (A) anteroposterior (AP) (B) maBland-Altman plots illustrate the bias towards smaller mean diameter measurements for AP ultrasound (US) when compared with computed tomography (CT) in different planes (A) anteroposterior (AP) (B) maximum ellipse (ME), (C) perpendicular to the centerline of flow (PCLF), (D) perpendicular to the maximum ellipse (PME). Differences between CT measurements are also shown in (E) CT-AP vs CT-PCLF and (F) CT PCLF vs CT PME. Note that the x-axis range varies between plots.
Competition of interest: none.
PII: S0741-5214(09)00610-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.02.243
© 2009 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 50, Issue 2
, Pages
263-268
, August 2009
