« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 49, Issue 5
, Pages 1093-1099
, May 2009
Prediction of 30-day mortality after endovascular repair or open surgery in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms
References
- . Glasgow aneurysm score. Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;2:41–44
- Risk-scoring methods in predicting the immediate outcome after emergency open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Am J Surg. 2006;192:19–23
- . Glasgow Aneurysm Score as a predictor of immediate outcome after surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1449–1452
- . Validity of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score and the Hardman Index in predicting outcome after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2005;92:570–573
- . Prognostic scoring in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a prospective evaluation. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:282–286
- . Emergency endovascular repair of leaking aortic aneurysm. Lancet. 1994;344:1645
- . Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: endovascular repair versus open surgery–systematic review. Radiology. 2007;245:122–129
- . Endovascular treatment of ruptured and symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;31:345–350
- . Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a shift of the paradigm?. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12:548–555
- Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular treatment. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30:263–269
- . Emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: feasibility and comparison of early results with conventional open repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30:632–639
- . A randomised trial of endovascular and open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm - results of a pilot study and lessons learned for future studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;32:506–513discussion 514-5.
- Endograft treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms using the Talent aortouniiliac system: an international multicenter study. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:1111–1123discussion 1123.
- . Endovascular repair versus open surgery in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: clinical outcomes with 1-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:1148–1155
- . Objective risk-scoring systems for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: applicability in endovascular repair?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36:172–177
- . The Glasgow Aneurysm Score as a tool to predict 30-day and 2-year mortality in the patients from the Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management trial. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:277–281
- Comparison of risk-scoring methods in predicting the immediate outcome after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;34:505–513
- . External validation of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score to predict outcome in elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:712–716discussion 717.
- . Objective scoring systems of medical risk: a clinical tool for selecting patients for open or endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:1102–1108
- . http://www.ccmo-online.nl/Accessed: February 10, 2006.
- . Imputation of missing values is superior to complete case analysis and the missing-indicator method in multivariable diagnostic research: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1102–1109
- . Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: a study on sample size and shrinkage. Stat Med. 2004;23:2567–2586
- . Regression Modeling Strategies: with Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. New York: Springer; 2001;
- . Feasibility of preoperative computer tomography in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a time-to-death study in patients without operation. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:788–791
- Patients enrolled in coronary intervention trials are not representative of patients in clinical practice: results from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:671–678
- Why are patients in clinical trials of heart failure not like those we see in everyday practice?. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1157–1162
The study was funded by Erasmus MC Health Care Efficiency grant and an unrestricted educational grant from the “Lijf en Leven” Foundation.
Competition of interest: none.
PII: S0741-5214(08)02264-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.12.027
© 2009 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 49, Issue 5
, Pages 1093-1099
, May 2009
