Journal Home
Search for

Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages 568-575 (March 2009)


View previous. 13 of 77 View next.

Fenestrated endovascular repair for juxtarenal aortic pathology

Presented at the Society for Vascular Surgery Annual Meeting, San Diego, Calif, Jun 5-8, 2008.

Thorarinn Kristmundsson, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Björn Sonesson, MD, PhD, Martin Malina, MD, PhD, Katarina Björses, MD, Nuno Dias, MD, PhD, Timothy Resch, MD, PhD

Received 23 May 2008; accepted 5 October 2008. published online 12 January 2009.

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (f-EVAR) in a tertiary European referral center.

Methods

All patients treated with commercially available custom-made f-EVAR between September 2002 and June 2007 were prospectively enrolled in a computerized database including co-morbidities and aneurysm morphology. Patients were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up consisted of clinical examinations and computed tomography (CT) scanning.

Results

A total of 54 patients were included in this study. Median age was 72 (interquartile range [IQR] 68-76) years and 85% were men. Median preoperative aneurysm diameter was 60 (53-66) mm. One hundred thirty-four vessels were targeted (43 scallops, 91 fenestrations) and 96 stents were placed (69 bare, 27 covered). Target vessel catheterization was achieved in 98% of cases. Two patients (3.7%) died within 30 days, 1 from trash embolization and multiorgan failure and 1 from retroperitoneal bleeding caused by a renal artery perforation. Three type I endoleaks occurred intraoperatively, two sealed pre-discharge and one was treated with a Palmaz stent (Cordis, Miami Lakes, Fla) on postoperative day 4. Thirteen patients had type II endoleaks, and 2 required treatment. The median clinical follow-up was 25 (12-32) months with median CT follow-up of 22 (4-26) months. Aneurysm diameter decreased ≥5 mm in 47%, was unchanged in 50%, and increased ≥5 mm in 3% of patients at 1 year. There were three type II endoleaks at 1-year follow-up, one of which was successfully treated after 19 months due to aneurysm growth. Ninety-six percent of target vessels remained patent during the study period and all occlusions occurred within the first year of follow-up. Five target vessels occluded (2 renal arteries [RAs] and 3 superior mesenteric arteries [SMAs]) without symptoms during follow-up and successful reinterventions were done on 2 stenosed RAs. Three patients suffered creatinine increase but none needed dialysis. One late aneurysm-related death occurred due to massive bleeding during redo surgery for infection.

Conclusion

Despite complex anatomy or severe comorbidities in these patients f-EVAR has acceptable short- and midterm results in this series which includes a learning curve and offers a valid treatment alternative to patients unsuitable for standard EVAR or open repair.

Vascular Center Malmö-Lund, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Thorarinn Kristmundsson, MD, Vascular Center Malmö-Lund, Malmö University Hospital, s. forstatsgatan 101, 20502 Malmö, Sweden

 Competition of interest: none.

PII: S0741-5214(08)01794-1

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.10.022


View previous. 13 of 77 View next.