« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 49, Issue 3
, Pages 543-550
, March 2009
Decrease in total aneurysm-related deaths in the era of endovascular aneurysm repair
References
- . Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:491–499
- . Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:464–474
- . Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:843–848
- A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1607–1618
- . Improving aneurysm-related outcomes: nationwide benefits of endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:446–452
- Understanding trends in inpatient surgical volume: vascular interventions, 1980-2000. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:1200–1208
- . Perioperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the united states during 2001. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:491–496
- . The impact of gender on presentation, therapy, and mortality of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States, 2001-2004. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:891–899
- Early outcomes of endovascular versus open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Private Sector (NSQIP-PS). J Vasc Surg. 2005;41:382–389
- Outcomes of endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:453
- Establishing a protocol for endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: outcomes of a prospective analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:1–8
- . Endovascular vs open repair of acute abdominal aortic aneurysms—a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:227–236
- . Expanding use of emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: disparities in outcomes from a nationwide perspective. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:1165–1170discussion 1170-1
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/Accessed: June 3, 008.
- Two decades of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: have we made any progress?. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:1091–1101
- . Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm repair in the United States from 1993 to 2003. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1085:1–10
- . A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2002;89:714–730
- . Early and mid-term results of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the endovascular era in a community hospital. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:898–905
- . Improved survival after introduction of an emergency endovascular therapy protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:443–450
- . A decade of change in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States: have we improved outcomes equally between men and women?. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:230–238
- The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1531–1539
- Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a consensus statement. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:267–269
- Middle age cardiovascular risk factors and abdominal aortic aneurysm in older age. Hypertension. 2003;42:61–68
- . Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in older adults enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:963–970
- . Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Vital Health Stat. 2007;10:1–153
- . Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control-continued disparities in adults: United States, 2005-2006 (NCHS data brief no 3). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Heath Statistics; 2008;
- . Health, United States, 2004 (With chartbook on trends in the health of Americans). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2004;
- . Risk factors, medical therapies and perioperative events in limb salvage surgery: observations from the PREVENT III multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:456–464
Supported by the Harvard-Longwood Research in Vascular Surgery Program. National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant 5 T32HL007734 (NIH-NHLBI).
Competition of interest: none.
PII: S0741-5214(08)01678-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.067
© 2009 The Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 49, Issue 3
, Pages 543-550
, March 2009
