Journal Home
Search for

Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages 576-581.e3 (March 2009)


View previous. 15 of 77 View next.

Preferences for endovascular (EVAR) or open surgical repair among patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms under surveillance

Rebecca J. Winterborn, MD, MRCSaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Irum Amin, MRCSb, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, MD, FFPH, MRCPc, Nicola Walker, RNa, Kevin Varty, MD, FRCSb, W. Bruce Campbell, MS, FRCP, FRCSd

Received 1 July 2008; accepted 12 September 2008.

Objectives

There is no evidence about patient preferences for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or open surgical repair (OSR). This study examined patient preferences for elective future aneurysm repair and factors that may influence such preferences.

Methods

Patients with small AAAs under ultrasound scan surveillance at two United Kingdom (UK) hospitals participated in a semi-structured telephone interview. Features of the two techniques were assessed with regard to their influence on the preferences of participants for EVAR or OSR, using a Likert scale. In addition, participants ranked the relative importance of 14 features against each other.

Results

Fifty-six out of 100 eligible participants (56%) completed the semi-structured telephone interview. Of those, 84% (47 patients) said they would prefer a future EVAR repair. Patients who expressed a preference for OSR were significantly younger. Risks of major organ failure and death were most commonly judged as important features in influencing patient preference (Likert scale score 5/5). Risk of death was also most frequently ranked above all other features. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were regarded by patients as more important than the need for surveillance and risk of long-term problems with EVAR. Type of incision and radiation exposure were both given low Likert scale scores of 1/5, and the risk of sexual dysfunction was most frequently ranked as the least important feature of either operation, out of 14 other features.

Conclusion

When presented with detailed information about EVAR and OSR, most patients with small aneurysms would prefer EVAR.

a Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom

b Cambridge Vascular Unit, United Kingdom

c Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

d Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital and Peninsula Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Rebecca J. Winterborn, MD, Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, United Kingdom

 Competition of interest: none.

 Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.

PII: S0741-5214(08)01596-6

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.012


View previous. 15 of 77 View next.