« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 49, Issue 2
, Pages 325-330
, February 2009
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy in the United States
References
- [No authors listed.] Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators). N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445–453
- [No authors listed.] Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998;351:1379–1387
- Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators). N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1415–1425
- 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2006;368:1239–1247
- Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:258–268
- Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1660–1671
- Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:1106–1111
- . Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians is associated with increased adverse outcomes. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:297–304
- . The impact of increasing age on anatomic factors affecting carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:875–880
- . Trends in aging–United States and worldwide. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:101–104106
- . Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD). www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/sidoverview.jspAccessed March 15, 2008
- . Using the AHRQ quality indicators to improve health care quality. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31:533–538
- . Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27
- . Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:12
- Comorbidity Software, version 3.3. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/comorbidity/comorbidity.jspAccessed July 17, 2008
- . The economic burden of chronic cardiovascular disease for major insurers. Health Promot Pract. 2007;8:234–242
- . Current status and future directions of geriatric general surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(7 Suppl):S351–S354
- . Economic evaluation of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:413–419
- The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;70:1025–1033
- Safety and efficacy of elective carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1721–1728
- . Carotid artery stenting in older patients: is age a risk factor for poor outcome?. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9:559–565
- . Carotid angioplasty and stenting in the elderly. Neuroradiology. 2007;49:933–938
- Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians: results from the ALKK Carotid Artery Stent (CAS) Registry. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:370–375
- . Carotid endarterectomy was performed with lower stroke and death rates than carotid artery stenting in the United States in 2003 and 2004. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:1112–1118
- Carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: evidence basis and cost implications. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36:258–264discussion 265-6
- Is carotid angioplasty and stenting more cost effective than carotid endarterectomy?. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:331–339
- . Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population: trial hospitals, volume, and patient characteristics. JAMA. 1998;279:1278–1281
Competition of interest: none.
PII: S0741-5214(08)01588-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.112
© 2009 The Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 49, Issue 2
, Pages 325-330
, February 2009
