Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 49, Issue 1 , Pages 4-10, January 2009

Supra-aortic vessels aneurysms: Diagnosis and prompt intervention

  • Marcelo Cury, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Roy K. Greenberg, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Roy K. Greenberg, MD, S40, Department of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195
  • ,
  • Jose P. Morales, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Walid Mohabbat, MBBS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Adrian V. Hernandez, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Received 19 June 2008; accepted 27 August 2008.

Article Outline

Purpose

Aneurysms involving the supra-aortic vessels are rare but carry serious risk of embolization, thrombosis, and rupture. We describe our experience with the diagnosis, treatment strategies, and outcomes in patients with extended follow-up.

Methods

Data during a 17-year period (January 1990 to December 2007) was analyzed. We assessed age, gender, presenting symptoms, localization, pathologic diagnosis, type of procedures, complications, and survival.

Results

A total of 74 patients were treated for supra-aortic aneurysms. Of all aneurysms treated, 63% were degenerative, 24% iatrogenic, 8% traumatic, 3% genetic, and 1% mycotic. The subclavian artery was most commonly affected (50%, 2/3 in the right side), followed by the common carotid (36%), internal carotid (10%), innominate (3%), and vertebral (1%). At the time of diagnosis, 52 patients (70%) were asymptomatic, but of those symptomatic 68% had an embolic event as a presenting symptom. Embolic episodes were more common in patients with smaller aneurysms (P < .006). Open surgery was performed in 77% of all cases, and the use of endovascular techniques became the predominant treatment modality over the last 4 years. Survival at 30 days was 100%. Five- and 10-year survival rates were 87% and 43%, respectively.

Conclusion

Most cases of supra-aortic aneurysm are asymptomatic and embolization as opposed to rupture represents the greatest risk to the patient. Most cases can be detected prior to symptoms. Endovascular repair is an emerging alternative of treatment and, with the current development of appropriate devices, will likely form the mainstay of therapy in the near future.

 

Aneurysms involving the supra-aortic arteries (subclavian, innominate, carotid, external carotid, and vertebral arteries below the skull base) represent an uncommon form of aneurysmal disease.1 The first surgical intervention performed on these types of aneurysms was reported in 1805 by Sir Astley Cooper in a patient who had a carotid artery aneurysm that was successfully treated by vessel ligation.2 In subsequent years, 173 aneurysms have been reported (Table I). The etiology of these aneurysms may be similar to those located in the aorta which are commonly degenerative.3 However, other etiologies such as congenital aneurysms,4 traumatic pseudoaneurysm,5, 6 vasculitic disease,7 connective tissue disorders,8 or infections9, 10, 11, 12 are more often diagnosed compromising the supra-aortic vessels. Supra-aortic aneurysms comprise between 0.4 and 4% of all aneurysms.13, 14, 15, 16

Table I. Large series published in the literature for supra-aortic aneurysms
AuthorYearNumber of casesFollow-upLocalization
SubclavianCommon carotidInternal carotidInnominateVertebral
Beall, A et al321962711yrs03400
Pairolero, P et al3319813120yrs310000
Thomas, T et al46198952yrs00050
Bower, T et al1319917340yrs4125061
Prêtre, R et al341994148yrs111020
Regina, G et al2919991610yrs64060
Kieffer, E et al2520012727yrs000270
Current Series20087417yrs3727821 ⁎⁎
Total 247 1266012482 ⁎⁎

There are no large series reporting endovascular treatment of supra-aortic aneurysms, just isolated case reports.

⁎⁎Multiple aneurysms.

Similar to many other aneurysms, supra-aortic vessel aneurysms pose serious risks including: rupture, thrombosis, and local compression, but also have an associated risk of catastrophic brain embolization and stroke. The incidence of neurologic events had been reported to be as huge as 50%17 with a mortality rate close to 70% in patients left untreated.18 Many variations of presenting symptoms have been described, including dysphagia, hoarseness, Horner's syndrome, supraclavicular pain, transient ischemic attacks (TIA), stroke, or the presence of a palpable mass.19 The use of radiological modalities, especially computed tomography (CT), are essential both to confirm the diagnosis and to plan repair.20, 21, 22, 23 Surgical resection of the aneurysm followed by an interposition has been the standard treatment.6, 24, 25 However, with the rapid evolution of endovascular techniques, novel approaches for the treatment of supra-aortic aneurysms have been described.26, 27, 28 The aim of this study is to examine our experience with aneurysms of the supra-aortic vessels, their presenting symptoms, diagnostic modalities used, type of intervention performed, and outcomes in patients with extended follow-up.

Back to Article Outline

Methods 

A consecutive cohort of patients who were diagnosed with supra-aortic vessel aneurysm at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) from January 1990 to December 2007 was retrospectively analyzed using both clinical notes and radiological studies. The following variables were taken into consideration: gender, age, pathologic diagnosis, location, presenting symptom, imaging modality used (arteriography, ultrasound [US], CT), size and type of aneurysm, duration and type of procedure, intra-operative blood loss, type of grafts (prosthetic, autogenous vein, or stent graft) and complications. Surgical intervention and follow-up was performed at the discretion of the treating surgeon.

Categorical variables were shown as number (percentage) and continuous variables as median (interquartile range [IQR]). We compared patients' characteristics among open surgery, endovascular surgery, and no interventional treatment groups by using the Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to assess overall survival. Mortality was determined based on patient medical records and supplemented by querying the Social Security Death Index at the time of analysis. Follow-up times were calculated based on the last clinical contact with the patient at the CCF, or through communication from an outside hospital that provides surrogate follow-up on behalf of the CCF. A P value of < .05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using S-Plus 7.0 (Insightful Corp, Seattle, Wash).

Back to Article Outline

Results 

A total of 74 patients with supra-aortic vessel aneurysms were identified (64% men) with a median age of 69 years (IQR 49-76) and a mean follow-up of 29 months. Six patients did not return for scheduled follow-up studies following their first postoperative visit. Patient characteristics overall and across treatment groups are shown in Table II. The majority (63%) of cases were attributed to atherosclerotic degeneration. Age of presentation is indicative of etiology, as most patients presenting with degenerative aneurysms seems to fall in the >60-year-old age group (Fig 1). In the 40-60-year-old group, degenerative aneurysms were found in 53%, iatrogenic in 29%, traumatic in 12%, and 6% had Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Table III describes the modality and clinical scenario in which asymptomatic patients were discovered.

Table II. Demographics of patients presenting to our institution with supra-aortic aneurysms
CharacteristicTotal (n = 74)Open surgery (n = 57)Endovascular surgery (n = 11)No surgical treatment (n = 6)P
Age (y)69(49-76)68(50-76)70(35-76)70(69-76).5
Male47(64)36(63)7(64)4(67).8
Localization of aneurysm .6
Common carotid27(36)23(40)2(18)2(33)
Internal carotid8(10)7(12)1(9)0
Subclavian37(50)25(44)8(73)4(67)
Innominate2(3)2(4)00
Vertebral1(1)1(1)00
Size(mm)30(22-40)30(22-38)45(40-47)22(22-30).005
Cause .05
Atherosclerotic47(63)35(61)7(64)5(83)
Iatrogenic18(24)16(28)2(18)0
Ehlers-Danlos2(3)02(18)0
Mycotic1(1)1(2)00
Traumatic6(8)5(9)01(17)
Symptoms .3
Asymptomatic52(70)38(67)9(82)5(71)
Dysphagia2(3)1(2)01(17)
Hoarseness2(3)2(4)00
TIA9(12)7(12)2(18)0
Arm claudication9(12)9(16)00
Smoking34(46)26(46)5(45)3(50).9
Diabetes4(5)4(7)00.5
COPD6(8)4(7)2(18)0.4
CAD19(26)9(16)6(55)4(67).002
Extra aneurysm22(30)14(25)4(36)4(67).09
Complications Pre-treatment171322.4
Embolization13(76)11(85)1(50)1(50)
Compression4(24)2(15)1(50)1(50)
Complications Post-treatment161411.7
Embolization4(25)4(29)00
Occlusion3(19)3(21)00
Re-intervention3(19)3(21)00
Death6(38)4(29)1(100)1(100)

Categorical variables as n(%); Continuous as median(interquartile range [IQR]).

P refers to differences among types of treatment.

Multiple aneurysms; TIA, transient ischemic attack; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CAD, coronary artery disease.

Table III. Supra-aortic aneurysms found incidentally by complimentary exams
Computed tomography19
Cancer screening or follow-up5
Associated aortic aneurysm14
Ultrasound13
Post-op vascular surgery(CEA)13
X-ray5
Pace maker review2
Congestive heart failure screening3
Echocardiogram3
Post-op valve replacement3

CEA, Carotid endarterectomy.

The subclavian artery was the vessel most commonly affected (50%), and 2/3 of the cases were on the right side, followed by the common carotid artery with 27 cases (36%), internal carotid with 8 cases (10%), innominate with 2 cases (3%), and vertebral in 1 case with bilateral presentation (1%). Of the 37 subclavian artery aneurysms, 7 had an aberrant right subclavian artery. The median size of all the aneurysms at the time of diagnosis was 30 mm (IQR 22-40). Fifty-two of 74 patients were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis (70%) and 15 patients (20%) had suffered embolization (9 strokes or TIA and 6 upper-limb embolization). In the subgroup of 9 patients who developed cerebral emboli were, on average, 68-years-old and had a median interval between aneurysm diagnosis and embolic first subsequent event was 61 days (IQR 59-184). The average time between embolic event and treatment was 8 days. The remaining 7 (9%) symptomatic patients presented with arm claudication (three cases), dysphagia (in two cases), or hoarseness (in two cases). An additional 13 embolic events occurred during follow-up prior to treatment, 7 of those were in patients with previous embolization. Overall, 28% of patients with supra-aortic vessel aneurysm developed problems with embolization. Interestingly those patients that had embolization, only 24% (5/21) of them had visible thrombus within the aneurysm sac on CT scan. Also of interest, embolic episodes (strokes, TIA, upper limb embolization, and claudication) were more common in patients with smaller aneurysms (P < .006). There was no statistical significance regarding the location of the aneurysm and the symptoms.

Sixty-eight (92%) of the patients underwent an intervention, of which 57 (77%) underwent an open surgical repair (including all 7 patients with aberrant subclavian), 11 (15%) underwent endovascular repair: 8 subclavian - one of those had a hybrid repair with associated open repair of the vertebral artery (Fig 2), 2 common carotid (Fig 3) and 1 internal carotid artery (Fig 4). In the 11 patients treated with an endovascular approach, 8 had aneurysmal sac size contraction (73%), while 3 patients maintained a stable maximal aneurysm diameter. There were no endoleaks or aneurysm sac growth noted over the follow-up period. A history of either prior aortic aneurysm repair or concomitant aortic aneurysm was noted in 22 patients. One patient with a history of aortic dissection was identified in this series. Complications while awaiting intervention occurred in 17 patients, of which embolization accounted for 13/17 (76%), symptoms from local compression developed in 4/17 (24%). Complications associated with the procedure occurred in 12 patients but with no statistical significant difference between treatment options (P < .7, Table II). Freedom from complications in all patients is shown in Fig 5.

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig 2. 

    A, 3D reconstruction of a computed tomography (CT) scan shows a normal aortic arch with a left subclavian aneurysm and a tortuous aneurysmatic right vertebral artery. B, Same patient postintervention demonstrates a patent left subclavian stent in situ (arrow), a right vertebral to right carotid transposition (arrow) excluding the vertebral aneurysm, and retrograde flow to the left vertebral artery through the posterior cerebral artery (arrow).

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig 4. 

    A and B, 3D reconstruction computed tomography (CT) scan shows a patent internal carotid stent (arrow) excluding an internal carotid pseudo-aneurysm from a previous open repair with PTFE graft (arrow) (anterior/posterior [AP] and lateral views).

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig 5. 

    Kaplan-Meier curve shows freedom from complications in all patients. The solid line represents the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and dotted lines represent the upper and lower 95% confidence intervals.

In the patients who underwent open surgery, 47 had carotid-subclavian or carotid-carotid bypass, 9 had subclavian to axillary artery interposition, and 1 had thoracotomy with left subclavian ligation and left common carotid to axillary artery bypass using a vein as a conduit. Patients selected for endovascular approach had relative contraindications to open surgical repair: 4 had previous neck surgeries, 4 had previous thoracic surgeries, 2 had connective tissue disease that made open surgery higher risk (both were Ehlers-Danlos type IV – Fig 2), 1 had multiple medical comorbidities with an aneurysm which was too high to access surgically. When the proximal aspect of the innominate right or left common carotid arteries were involved in the repair, an extra-anatomic bypass with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) was created (carotid-subclavian bypass), typically followed by the deployment of a thoracic stent graft. However, in the setting of an isolated left subclavian artery aneurysm, the arterial origin was most commonly covered in the absence of revascularization. The distal flow into the aneurysm was treated with endovascular coils or glue.

Indications for non-operative management were present in 6 patients. These included advanced age, high surgical risk, or refusal of the procedure. In the untreated subset of patients, 2 developed a stroke (33%), of which 1 expired as a result. None of them had aneurysm growth in the period of follow-up of 41 months.

Thirty-day survival was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 100-100), and 5- and 10-year survival rates were 87% (95% CI 76-99) and 43% (95% CI 11-100), respectively. The mean survival time was 91 months (standard deviation [SD] 41 months).

There were 6 late deaths (>30 days) in our series (8% of the cases) in which one was procedure-related (retroperitoneal hemorrhage following diagnostic angiogram needed to further access the anatomy and plan the procedure at day 39). Three deaths were due to concomitant thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (two as a result of rupture, and one following elective repair). The remaining patients died as a result of a stroke and ovarian cancer. Overall survival is demonstrated in Fig 6.

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig 6. 

    Kaplan-Meier curve shows overall survival in patients with supra aortic aneurysms. The solid line represents the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and dotted lines represent the upper and lower 95% confidence intervals.

Back to Article Outline

Discussion 

Most publications found in the medical literature regarding supra-aortic aneurysms, are either from small series or isolated case reports, which account for 200 cases in the English literature (Table I) in the last 100 years. Aneurysms of the supra-aortic vessels had been reported to be symptomatic in up to 50% of patients.29, 30, 31, 32, 33 However, we found that in contemporary practice they are more commonly discovered following screening or follow-up exams such as CT, x-rays, or US for asymptomatic patients (Table III), with just 25% of patients presenting with symptoms at the time of diagnosis. An association between supra-aortic vessel aneurysm and aortic aneurysm has been reported,34,35 and in accordance with this we found that several of our patients who had a supra-aortic aneurysm were diagnosed during the work-up for other aortic pathology. This included associated thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm as well as thoracic aortic dissection. Once diagnosed, any supra-aortic vessel aneurysm should be considered a clinically significant lesion as it has the potential of significant complications if left untreated. Overall, 28% of our patients suffered from embolization, 15 as a presenting symptom and 6 following the diagnosis but prior to any treatment. In our series, the incidence of aneurysm-related death was 5% (which three were related to an associated aortic aneurysms and one as a stroke in a patient with no intervention) and permanent disability as a consequence of stroke was 5%.

Innominate artery aneurysms had been described as the most common supra-aortic aneurysm.19,36-38 Due to their rarity, a few reports have analyzed these aneurysms as an entire group.39-41 Kieffer et al42 reported one of the largest series of innominate artery aneurysms treated with surgical repair. Seventeen patients (63%) had associated aortic aneurysms, 14 patients were asymptomatic at the time of operation, and the most common underlying etiologies were vasculitis in 7 patients, degenerative disease in 6, and syphilis in 5. In contrast to prior reports, our series noted a predominance of subclavian artery aneurysms, followed by the common carotid and then the internal carotid. Although historically innominate, aneurysms were commonly reported, there were 2 patients (3%) in our series that were treated for isolated aneurysms of the innominate artery, which may relate to the predominant degenerative etiology in 63% of patients. A concomitant history of aortic aneurysms was noted in 22 patients (30%), supporting the relationship between these two entities.

Advances in surgical techniques over the last century have provided feasible ways to treat the majority of supra-aortic aneurysms by using an interposition graft, which has been established as a gold standard treatment. However, the open surgical approach for aneurysms of the proximal supra-aortic vessels is invasive and may involve a median sternotomy with or without cervical extension. Open repairs become even more complex in the settings of a supra-aortic vessel aneurysm associated with aortic arch pathology, necessitating the use of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA). The estimated perioperative mortality rates for emergency and elective repair of aneurysms involving the aortic arch is 50% and 4%, respectively.43 In the last decade, stent graft technology has evolved remarkably and has now been applied as an alternative way of treatment for supra-aortic aneurysms.

The later patients in our series were all treated with commercially-available stent grafts combined with balloon angioplasty. Our results suggest that such devices can be used safely and efficiently to exclude true aneurysms or pseudoaneurysms of the supra-aortic arteries with very low complication rates when comparing to open surgical repair. Although aneurysms of the distal supra-aortic vessels were frequently amenable to pure endovascular repair, more proximal aneurysms often required hybrid procedures, sometimes involving extra-anatomical bypass of the neck vessels followed by thoracic endografting.44,45 The advantages of this technique are the avoidance of aortic cross-clamping and the need for DHCA.

Although our study is a descriptive retrospective analysis from a single institution, it is the largest series published up to date and the largest including endovascular treatment. Because of the rare nature of this entity, the development of randomized control trials for its treatment is unrealistic, and clinicians rely upon these types of publications to help guide management decisions. There are, however, limitations to our work. A retrospective analysis carries an innate selection bias that relies on the clinical suspicion and reporting practices of clinicians outside of a standardized study environment. The subgroups reported (non-operative treatment and endovascular repair) are quite small, and thus may be subject to type II error when intergroup comparisons are made. Furthermore, this is a series from a highly specialized referral care center, and patients who attend the CCF may be different than those who present to general tertiary care centers, which affect the generalizability of the results. We also suspect that recent improvements in imaging modalities have lead to a better assessment of the aortic arch vessels and earlier detection of these types of aneurysms. Thus, the patients and population earlier in the series may differ from more recent experience. Despite these caveats, we believe that when diagnosed, patients with any type of supra-aortic vessel aneurysm should undergo either open, endovascular, or hybrid repair as the risk of devastating complications is there and the repair can be achieved with low mortality and morbidity rates.

In conclusion, after a thorough review of 17 years of experience with supra-aortic vessel aneurysms at a single center, we have found that most cases are asymptomatic at presentation if patients with concomitant thoracic aortic pathology are imaged and that embolization poses the major risk. Embolization phenomenon were more common in patients with smaller size aneurysms. This may cause physicians to advocate prompt intervention not just based only on the size but on the presence of a supra-aortic aneurysm itself. Recent experience suggests that endovascular therapy is an emerging alternative of treatment with good results and low mortality and with the current development of appropriate devices, will likely form the mainstay of therapy in the near future.

Back to Article Outline

Author contributions 


Conception and design: MC, RG, JM

Analysis and interpretation: MC, RG, AH

Data collection: MC, RG, JM

Writing the article: MC, RG, JM, WM, AH

Critical revision of the article: MC, RG, JM, WM

Final approval of the article: MC, RG, JM, WM, AH

Statistical analysis: AH

Obtained funding: RG

Overall responsibility: MC, RG

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Bower TC, Cherry KJ. Diseases of the brachiocephalic arteries and their management (Overview). Semin Vasc Surg. 1996;9:71–76
  2. Ellis H. Sir Astley Paston Cooper: a pioneer of arterial surgery. Med Herit. 1985;1:289–292
  3. Schumacher PD, Wright CB. Management of arteriosclerotic aneurysm of the innominate artery. Surgery. 1979;85:489–495
  4. Webb WR. Tetralogy of Fallot with an innominate artery aneurysm. AMA Arch Surg. 1956;73:999–1003
  5. Johnston FG, Waters A, Gresham GA. Traumatic aneurysm of the left common carotid artery. J Clin Pathol. 1990;43:1038
  6. Bosher LH. The surgical treatment of traumatic rupture or avulsion of the innominate artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1967;54:732–739
  7. Hoffman GS. Large-vessel vasculitis: unresolved issues. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:2406–2414
  8. Tuzuner A, Uncu H. A case of Behcet's disease with an abdominal aortic aneurysm and two aneurysms in the common carotid artery - a case report. Angiology. 1996;47:1173–1180
  9. Heyd J, Yinnon AM. Mycotic aneurysm of the external carotid-artery. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;35:329–331
  10. Oyanagi M, Sugawara T, Seki H, Ogawa Y, Yagi T, Nozaki E, et al. [A case of bacterial aneurysm that occurred in the external carotid artery.] No Shinkei Geka. Neurological Surgery. 2006;34:175–180
  11. Teramo M, Del Grande G. Aneurysms of the innominate artery; x-ray-angiocardiographic-cinematographic illustration of a case with tuberculous pathogenesis. Policlinico [Prat]. 1957;64:1706–1712
  12. Criado FJ. Extrathoracic management of aortic arch syndrome. Br J Surg. 1982;69(Suppl):S45–S51
  13. Bower TC, Pairolero PC, Hallett JW, Toomey BJ, Gloviczki P, Cherry KJ. Brachiocephalic aneurysm: the case for early recognition and repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:125–132
  14. Regina G, Greco L, Fullone M, Testini M, Caruso G, Rizzi R. The emergency treatment of aneurysms of the supra-aortic trunks and of the internal carotid. Ann Ital Chir. 2000;71:469–473
  15. Brewster DC, Moncure AC, Darling RC, Ambrosino JJ, Abbott WM. Innominate artery lesions: problems encountered and lessons learned. J Vasc Surg. 1985;2:99–112
  16. Villegas-Cabello O, Cooley DA. Aneurysm of the innominate artery with aberrant origin of the left carotid artery - case report. Tex Heart Inst J. 1996;23:298–300
  17. Livolsi A, Donato L, Germain P, Kastler B, Bintner M, Casanova R, et al. Preoperative and postoperative MRI study of an aneurysm of the right brachiocephalic artery with tracheal compression. Eur J Pediatr. 1993;152:457
  18. Wang AM, O'Leary DH. Common carotid artery aneurysm: ultrasonic diagnosis. J Clin Ultrasound. 1988;16:262–264
  19. Bower TC. Aneurysms of the great vessels and their branches. Semin Vasc Surg. 1996;9:134–146
  20. Yazawa K, Fukaya Y, Nakano H, Kuroda H, Nishimura K, Amano J. A case of a successfully treated subclavian aneurysm complicated by a brachiocephalic aneurysm, and the left vertebral artery occlusion. Nippon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1997;45:1854–1857
  21. Cil BE, Ucar I, Ozsoy F, Arat A, Yorgancioglu C, Böke E. Successful endovascular treatment of a left common carotid artery aneurysm following failed surgery of a right common carotid artery aneurysm. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;28:367–371
  22. Izumoto H, Mori T, Imai K. Stent-grafting for the large common carotid artery aneurysm - case report. Interventional Neuroradiology. 2006;12:219–220
  23. Puech-Leão P, Orra HA. Endovascular repair of an innominate artery true aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther. 2001;8:429–432
  24. Johnson JN, Helsby CR, Stell PM. Aneurysm of the external carotid-artery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1980;21:105–107
  25. Kieffer E, Chiche L, Koskas F, Bahnini A. Aneurysms of the innominate artery: surgical treatment of 27 patients. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:222–228
  26. Painter TA, Hertzer NR, Beven EG, O'Hara PJ. Extracranial carotid aneurysms: report of six cases and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg. 1985;2:312–318
  27. Thomas TV. Intrathoracic aneurysms of the innominate and subclavian arteries. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1972;63:461–471
  28. Cook J. A report on three cases of innominate aneurysm. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1960;5:298–303
  29. Regina G, Greco L, Testini M, Todisco C, Iusco D, Rizzi R. Treatment of supra-aortic trunk aneurysms: report on 16 cases. Chir Ital. 1999;51:139–144
  30. Chan YC, Morales JP, Rocker MD, Bell RE, Carrell TW, Reidy JF, et al. Hybrid repair of type B dissecting aneurysm with associated Kommerell's diverticulum. Acta Chir Belg. 2007;107:211–214
  31. Melissano G, Civilini E, Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Chiesa R. Hybrid endovascular and off-pump open surgical treatment for synchronous aneurysms of the aortic arch, brachiocephalic trunk, and abdominal aorta. Tex Heart Inst J. 2004;31:283–287
  32. Beall AC, Crawford ES, Cooley DA, DeBakey ME. Extracranial aneurysms of the carotid artery (Report of seven cases). Postgrad Med. 1962;32:93–102
  33. Pairolero PC, Walls JT, Payne WS, Hollier LH, Fairbairn JF. Subclavian-axillary artery aneurysms. Surgery. 1981;90:757–763
  34. Pretre R, Murith N, Faidutti B. Lesions of the supra-aortic arterial trunks by closed trauma. Ann Chir. 1994;48:836–844

 Competition of interest: none.

PII: S0741-5214(08)01449-3

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.088

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 49, Issue 1 , Pages 4-10, January 2009