Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 49, Issue 1 , Pages 20-28 , January 2009

Evaluation of volumetric measurements in patients with acute type B aortic dissection – thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) vs conservative

  • Iris Eva Chemelli-Steingruber, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
  • ,
  • Andreas Chemelli, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
  • ,
  • Alexander Strasak, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
  • ,
  • Beate Hugl, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
  • ,
  • Renate Hiemetzberger, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
  • ,
  • Benedikt V. Czermak, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Benedikt V. Czermak, MD, University Hospital Innsbruck, Department of Radiology, Anichstr. 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria

Received 18 May 2008 ,Accepted 20 August 2008.

  • Image Result

    Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative rates of freedom from dissection-related death in patients treated for acute type B dissection, either by thoracic endovascular aortic repair or conservatively.

    Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative rates of freedom from dissection-related death in patients treated for acute type B dissection, either by thoracic endovascular aortic repair or conservatively.

  • Image Result

    Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative rates of rupture-free survival in patients treated for acute type B dissection, either by thoracic endovascular aortic repair or conservatively.

    Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative rates of rupture-free survival in patients treated for acute type B dissection, either by thoracic endovascular aortic repair or conservatively.

  • Image Result

    Volume courses of true thoracic lumen, false thoracic lumen, thoracic lumen and diameter in patients treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Mean values ± SD and medians of the different lumin

    Volume courses of true thoracic lumen, false thoracic lumen, thoracic lumen and diameter in patients treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Mean values ± SD and medians of the different lumina and of the diameter in percentages are shown. TTL, True thoracic lumen; FTL, false thoracic lumen; TL, thoracic lumen; D, diameter; SD, standard deviation; TEVAR, thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

  • Image Result
    Volume courses of true thoracic lumen, false thoracic lumen, thoracic lumen and diameter in conservatively treated patients. Mean values ± SD and medians of the different lumina and of the diameter in

    Volume courses of true thoracic lumen, false thoracic lumen, thoracic lumen and diameter in conservatively treated patients. Mean values ± SD and medians of the different lumina and of the diameter in percentages are shown. TTL, True thoracic lumen; FTL, false thoracic lumen; TL, thoracic lumen; D, xxx; SD, standard deviation.

  • Image Result
    Volume courses of the abdominal lumen in patients treated for acute type B dissection, either by thoracic endovascular aortic repair or conservatively. Mean values ± SD and medians of the different lu

    Volume courses of the abdominal lumen in patients treated for acute type B dissection, either by thoracic endovascular aortic repair or conservatively. Mean values ± SD and medians of the different lumina and of the diameter in percentages are shown. AL, Abdominal lumen; SD, standard deviation.

 Competition of interest: none.

PII: S0741-5214(08)01415-8

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.062

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 49, Issue 1 , Pages 20-28 , January 2009