« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 48, Issue 6
, Pages
1524-1531.e2
, December 2008
Angioplasty with stent graft versus bare stent for recurrent cephalic arch stenosis in autogenous arteriovenous access for hemodialysis: A prospective randomized clinical trial
-
Life-table analysis of the primary patency rates for 25 consecutive angioplasties of the cephalic arch using bare stents (triangles) or stent grafts (circles). The broken line indicates a standard err
Life-table analysis of the primary patency rates for 25 consecutive angioplasties of the cephalic arch using bare stents (triangles) or stent grafts (circles). The broken line indicates a standard error >10%.
-
Life-table analysis of the functional patency rates for 25 consecutive angioplasties of the cephalic arch using bare stents (circles) or stent grafts (triangles). The broken line indicates a standardLife-table analysis of the functional patency rates for 25 consecutive angioplasties of the cephalic arch using bare stents (circles) or stent grafts (triangles). The broken line indicates a standard error >10%.
-
A, Kinking of the cephalic vein by the end of a stent-graft due to the inherent inflexibility of the stent. B, The kink is straightened by deployment of an overlapping stent-graft more peripherally, iA, Kinking of the cephalic vein by the end of a stent-graft due to the inherent inflexibility of the stent. B, The kink is straightened by deployment of an overlapping stent-graft more peripherally, in keeping with the natural curve of the cephalic arch, and ending in the straight peripheral segment of the cephalic vein.
-
In-segment restenosis in a stent-graft. A, There is a stenosis at both ends of the stent graft in the regions that (B) the nitinol skeleton is not covered by polytetrafluoroethylene.In-segment restenosis in a stent-graft. A, There is a stenosis at both ends of the stent graft in the regions that (B) the nitinol skeleton is not covered by polytetrafluoroethylene.
Clinical Trials Registration Identifier: NCT00318435.
Competition of interest: none.
Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.
PII: S0741-5214(08)01219-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.071
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 48, Issue 6
, Pages
1524-1531.e2
, December 2008
