Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 80-87 , July 2008

Transfemoral endovascular treatment of proximal common carotid artery lesions: A single-center experience on 153 lesions

  • Tamás Mirkó Paukovits, MD

      Affiliations

    • Semmelweis University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Budapest, Hungary
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Tamás Mirkó Paukovits, MD, Semmelweis University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Varosmajor utca 68, Budapest, Hungary 1023.
  • ,
  • Judit Haász, MS

      Affiliations

    • Semmelweis University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Budapest, Hungary
  • ,
  • Andrea Molnár, MD

      Affiliations

    • Semmelweis University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Budapest, Hungary
  • ,
  • Zoltán Szeberin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Semmelweis University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Budapest, Hungary
  • ,
  • Balázs Nemes, MD

      Affiliations

    • Semmelweis University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Budapest, Hungary
  • ,
  • Dániel Varga, MD

      Affiliations

    • National Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Budapest, Hungary.
  • ,
  • Kálmán Hüttl, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Semmelweis University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Budapest, Hungary
  • ,
  • Viktor Bérczi, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Semmelweis University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Budapest, Hungary

Received 9 November 2007 ,Accepted 3 March 2008.

  • Image Result

    A and B, Successful PTA of the right proximal common carotid artery of a 51-year-old female, asymptomatic patient. Patient had follow-up duplex scan following previous internal carotid endarterectomy.

    A and B, Successful PTA of the right proximal common carotid artery of a 51-year-old female, asymptomatic patient. Patient had follow-up duplex scan following previous internal carotid endarterectomy. Duplex scan diagnosed 90% stenosis (PSV 450 cm/s) on the proximal part of right CCA. The patient remained neurologically negative throughout the follow-up period. The last follow-up duplex scan at 17 months showed patent CCA with no indication of restenosis.

  • Image Result
    Successful PTA and stent (8 × 18 mm Genesis, Cordis Corp, Miami, Fla) deployment in the left ostial lesion of common carotid of a 76-year-old asymptomatic female patient. Follow-up duplex scan showed

    Successful PTA and stent (8 × 18 mm Genesis, Cordis Corp, Miami, Fla) deployment in the left ostial lesion of common carotid of a 76-year-old asymptomatic female patient. Follow-up duplex scan showed no restenosis after 18 months follow-up. A, Angiography revealed 80% stenosis at the origin of the left CCA. B, Control angiography after stent implantation. Follow-up duplex screening showed no restenosis at 18 months.

  • Image Result
    A, Kaplan-Meier analysis of cumulative patency rate for 120 proximal common carotid artery interventions, excluding initial failures. Since the direct visualization of the proximal part of the common

    A, Kaplan-Meier analysis of cumulative patency rate for 120 proximal common carotid artery interventions, excluding initial failures. Since the direct visualization of the proximal part of the common carotid arteries by carotid duplex scan was not always possible during follow-up, we refer to “patency rate” rather than “restenosis-free patency rate” in our analysis. B, Kaplan-Meier curves of primary cumulative patency rate for 34 proximal common carotid artery angioplasty and 86 proximal common carotid artery stent implantation. Log rank test was used to compare primary cumulative patency rate between PTA and PTA/stent groups. (P = .825). C, Kaplan-Meier curves of secondary cumulative patency rate for angioplasty and stent implantation. Log rank test was used to compare secondary cumulative patency rate between PTA and PTA/stent groups (P = .680).

 Competition of interest: none.

PII: S0741-5214(08)00340-6

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.03.008

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 80-87 , July 2008