Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 29-36.e1 , July 2008

Regionalization of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Evidence of a shift to high-volume centers in the endovascular era

  • Joshua S. Hill, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Mass
    • ,
  • James T. McPhee, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Mass
    • ,
  • Louis M. Messina, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Mass
    • ,
  • Rocco G. Ciocca, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Caritas St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Brighton, Mass.
    • ,
  • Mohammad H. Eslami, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Mass
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Mohammad H. Eslami, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, 55 Lake Ave, Worcester, MA 01655.

Received 13 November 2007 ,Accepted 19 February 2008.

References 

  1. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747–1751
  2. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–1137
  3. Rouvelas I, Lindblad M, Zeng W, Viklund P, Ye W, Lagergren J. Impact of hospital volume on long-term survival after esophageal cancer surgery. Arch Surg. 2007;142:113–117
  4. Dimick JB, Stanley JC, Axelrod DA, Kazmers A, Henke PK, Jacobs LA, et al. Variation in death rate after abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy in the united states: Impact of hospital volume, gender, and age. Ann Surg. 2002;235:579–585
  5. Killeen SD, Andrews EJ, Redmond HP, Fulton GJ. Provider volume and outcomes for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomy, and lower extremity revascularization procedures. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2007;45:615–626
  6. Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson EVA, Birkmeyer CM. Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: Potential benefits of the leapfrog initiative. Surgery. 2001;130:415–422
  7. Birkmeyer J. Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery. 2004;135:569–575
  8. Parodi J, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Annals of vascular surgery. 1991;5:491–499
  9. Volodos' N. [A self-fixing synthetic blood vessel endoprosthesis] (Vestnik khirurgii im. I.I). Grekova. 1986;137:123–125
  10. Arko F, Lee WA, Hill B, Olcott C, Dalman RL, Haerris EJ, et al. Aneurysm-related death: Primary endpoint analysis for comparison of open and endovascular repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2002;36:297–304
  11. Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SE, Prinssen M, van der Ham AC, Buth J, van Sterkenburg SM, et al. Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) Trial Group Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2398–2405
  12. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG EVAR trial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:843–848
  13. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): Randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2005;365:2187–2192
  14. Lee LK, Faries PL. Assessing the effectiveness of endografts: clinical and experimental perspectives. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:A123–A130
  15. Nowygrod R, Egorova N, Greco G, Anderson P, Gelijns A, Moskowitz A, et al. Trends, complications, and mortality in peripheral vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:205–206
  16. Forbes T, Lawlor DK, DeRose G, Harris K. Examination of the trend in canada toward geographic centralization of aneurysm surgery during the endovascular era. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;20:63–68
  17. HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 1998;www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jspAccessed Feb 19, 2008
  18. HCUP comorbidity software. Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2000;http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/comorbidity/comorbidity.jspAccessed Feb 19, 2008
  19. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27
  20. Anderson P, Arons RR, Moskowitz AJ, Gelijns A, Magnell C, Faries PL. A statewide experience with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Rapid diffusion with excellent early results. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:10
  21. Manheim L, Sohn M, Feinglass J, Ujiki M, Parker M, Pearce W. Hospital vascular surgery volume and procedure mortality rates in California, 1982-1994.
  22. Urbach DR, Bell CM, Austin PC. Differences in operative mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals in Ontario for 5 major surgical procedures: estimating the number of lives potentially saved through regionalization. CMAJ. 2003;168:1409–1414
  23. Dudley RA, Johansen K, Brand R, Rennie D, Milstein A. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: Estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA. 2000;283:1159–1166
  24. McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF, Zayaruzny M, Litwin DE, Sullivan ME, et al. Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: A national perspective. Ann Surg. 2007;246:246–253
  25. McPhee JT, Hill JS, Eslami MH. The impact of gender on presentation, therapy, and mortality of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States, 2001-2004. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:891–899
  26. Petersen LA, Normand SL, Leape LL, McNeil BJ. Regionalization and the underuse of angiography in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System as compared with a fee-for-service system. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2209–2217
  27. Katz D, Stanley J, Zelenock G. Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm prevalence, treatment, and outcome. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:561–568
  28. Gornick M, Eggers PW, Reilly TW, Mentnech RM, Fitterman LK, Kucken LE, et al. Effects of race and income on mortality and use of services among medicare beneficiaries. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:791–799
  29. Feinglass J, Rucker-Whitaker C, Lindquist L, McCarthy W, Pearce W. Racial differences in primary and repeat lower extremity amputation: results from a multihospital study. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41:823–829
  30. Eslami M, Zayaruzny M, Fitzgerald G. The adverse effects of race, insurance status, and low income on the rate of amputation in patients presenting with lower extremity ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:55–59
  31. Jencks SF, Williams DK, Kay TL. Assessing hospital-associated deaths from discharge data (the role of length of stay and comorbidities). JAMA. 1988;260:2240–2246
  32. Iezzoni LI, Foley SM, Daley J, Hughes J, Fisher ES, Heeren T. Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias (does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality?). [see comment] JAMA. 1992;267:2197–2203

 Competition of interest: none.

 Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.

PII: S0741-5214(08)00301-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.02.048

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 29-36.e1 , July 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution