Management of endoleaks associated with endovascular treatment of descending thoracic aortic diseases
Presented at the 2006 Vascular Annual Meeting, Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA, June 1-4, 2006.
Received 16 August 2007; accepted 17 February 2008. published online 20 May 2008.
Objective
Endoluminal grafting is emerging as a less invasive alternative to the treatment of descending thoracic aorta diseases. Endoleaks (continued pressurization of the treated aorta external to the endoluminal graft) are a potential complication. We reviewed our cumulative endovascular experience for descending thoracic aorta pathologies with respect to the management of endoleaks and associated patient outcomes.
Methods
As part of a single-site investigational device–exemption protocol, 249 patients (146 men, 103 women) with thoracic aortic diseases underwent attempted delivery of a TAG endoprosthesis (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) between February 2000 and August 2005. Indications for study enrollment included 111 atherosclerotic aneurysms (44.6%), 67 aortic dissections (26.9%), 27 penetrating aortic ulcers (10.8%), 14 contained ruptures (5.6%), 11 pseudoaneurysms (4.4%), 9 acute aortic transections (3.6%), 7 aortobronchial fistulas (2.8%), 2 endoleaks (0.8%) after prior thoracic endoluminal grafting, and 1 (0.4%) adult coarctation. Endoleak surveillance was performed using serial computed tomography scans.
Results
Mean patient age was 68 years (range, 23-91 years). Endoleak developed in 38 patients (15.3%): 15 distal type I (39.5%), 13 proximal type I (34.2%), 8 type II (21.1%) and 2 type III (5.3%). No surgical intervention was performed in 26 patients (68.4%), in which the endoleak spontaneously resolved in 14 (53.8%), 8 (30.8%) are being monitored and are asymptomatic, 3 (11.5%) died of unrelated causes, 2 (7.7%) withdrew from the study, and 1 (3.8%) was lost to follow-up. Twelve patients (31.6%) required reintervention using an additional endoluminal graft: 8 (66.7%) with a proximal type I endoleak, 2 (16.7%) with a distal type I endoleak, 1 (8.3%) with both distal type I and type III endoleaks, and 1 (8.3%) with a type III endoleak. Open conversions were necessary secondary to device deployment difficulties in two patients (0.8%), and due to expansion of a thoracoabdominal aneurysm and rupture of an aneurysm secondary to a type II endoleak in one patient (0.5%) each.
Conclusion
Endoleaks are an infrequent, yet important, complication after thoracic endografting. Many endoleaks will resolve spontaneously, but some patients may require another endovascular intervention. Close surveillance is recommended for these patients; however, open conversion is rarely indicated. Because more diseases of the thoracic aorta are being treated using an endovascular approach, a standardized treatment algorithm is essential to safely and effectively manage associated endoleaks.
aDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Bayhealth Medical Center, Penn Cardiac Care, Dover, Del
bDepartment of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Arizona Heart Institute, Phoenix, Ariz.
Reprint requests: Ourania Preventza, MD, Bayhealth Medical Center, Penn Cardiac Care, 640 S State St, Dover, DE 19901.
ABSTRACT