« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 47, Issue 6
, Pages
1181-1187
, June 2008
What is the clinical utility of a 6-month computed tomography in the follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair patients?
-
Protocol for computed tomography (CT) surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), including number and types of endoleak at each follow-up patients in group I, group II, and those with abn
Protocol for computed tomography (CT) surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), including number and types of endoleak at each follow-up patients in group I, group II, and those with abnormal results on 1-month CT scans.
-
The 6-month computed tomography scan of the group I patient who developed main body thrombosis showed no evidence of stenosis at the narrowest portion of the aorta.The 6-month computed tomography scan of the group I patient who developed main body thrombosis showed no evidence of stenosis at the narrowest portion of the aorta.
-
The 6-month computed tomography scan of the group I patient who developed limb thrombosis showed no evidence of stenosis at the narrowest portion of the aorta.The 6-month computed tomography scan of the group I patient who developed limb thrombosis showed no evidence of stenosis at the narrowest portion of the aorta.
Competition of interest: none.
CME article
PII: S0741-5214(08)00194-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.056
© 2008 The Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 47, Issue 6
, Pages
1181-1187
, June 2008
