Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 47, Issue 3 , Pages 504-512 , March 2008

Thoracic and abdominal aortic dimension in 70-year-old men and women – A population-based whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study

  • Anders Wanhainen, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Anders Wanhainen, MD, PhD, Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, SE-371 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
    • ,
  • Raquel Themudo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University Hospital Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
    • Astrazeneca, Mölndal, Hospital Geral Santo António, Porto, Sweden
    • ,
  • Håkan Ahlström, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University Hospital Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
    • ,
  • Lars Lind, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Science, University Hospital Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
    • ,
  • Lars Johansson, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University Hospital Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
    • Department of Radiology, Hospital Geral Santo António, Porto, Sweden.

Received 18 July 2007 ,Accepted 21 October 2007.

References 

  1. Wanhainen A, Bjorck M, Boman K, Rutegard J, Bergqvist D. Influence of diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:229–235
  2. Wanhainen A, Lundgren E, Bergqvist D, Bjorck M. Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening starts now (First out with the invitation of all 65-year-old men is the county of Uppsala). Lakartidningen. 2006;103:2038–2039
  3. Sonesson B, Lanne T, Hansen F, Sandgren T. Infrarenal aortic diameter in the healthy person. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1994;8:89–95
  4. McGregor JC, Pollock JG, Anton HC. The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Scott Med J. 1975;20:133–137
  5. Sterpetti A, Schultz R, Feldhaus R, Cheng S, Peetz D. Factors influencing enlargement rate of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Surg Res. 1987;43:211–219
  6. Collin J, Walton J, Araujo L, Lindsell D. Oxford screening program for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men aged 65 to 74 years. Lancet. 1988;i:613–615
  7. Johnston K, Rutherford R, Tilson M, Shah D, Hollier L, Stanley J. Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1991;13:452–458
  8. Garcier JM, Petitcolin V, Filaire M, Mofid R, Azarnouch K, Ravel A, et al. Normal diameter of the thoracic aorta in adults: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;25:322–329
  9. Hager A, Kaemmerer H, Rapp-Bernhardt U, Blucher S, Rapp K, Bernhardt TM, et al. Diameters of the thoracic aorta throughout life as measured with helical computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:1060–1066
  10. Lucarelli CL, Cerri GG. Evaluation of normal thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters through computerized tomography. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 1996;51:239–246
  11. Coady MA, Rizzo JA, Hammond GL, Kopf GS, Elefteriades JA. Surgical intervention criteria for thoracic aortic aneurysms: a study of growth rates and complications. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:1922–1926
  12. Lind L, Fors N, Hall J, Marttala K, Stenborg A. A comparison of three different methods to evaluate endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the elderly: the Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS) study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:2368–2375
  13. Hansen T, Wikstrom J, Johansson LO, Lind L, Ahlstrom H. The prevalence and quantification of atherosclerosis in an elderly population assessed by whole-body magnetic resonance angiography. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:649–654
  14. Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single center randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2005;330:750
  15. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, Kim LG, Marteau TM, Scott RA, et al. Multicenter Aneurysm Screening Study Group The Multicenter Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1531–1539
  16. Norman PE, Jamrozik K, Lawrence-Brown MM, Le MT, Spencer CA, Tuohy RJ, et al. Population based randomized controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ. 2004;329:1259
  17. Vardulaki KA, Walker NM, Couto E, Day NE, Thompson SG, Ashton HA, et al. Late results concerning feasibility and compliance from a randomized trial of ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2002;89:861–864
  18. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Hye RJ, Makaroun MS, et al. The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: validation cohort and final results (Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators). Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1425–1430
  19. Aronberg DJ, Glazer HS, Madsen K, Sagel SS. Normal thoracic aortic diameters by computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984;8:247–250
  20. Kritpracha B, Wolfe J, Beebe H. CT artifacts of the proximal aortic neck: an important problem in endograft planning. JEVT. 2002;9:103–110
  21. Sprouse L, Meier G, Parent F, DeMasi R, Glickman M, Barber G. Is ultrasound more accurate than axial computed tomography for determination of maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28:28–35
  22. Hannuksela M, Lundqvist S, Carlberg B. Thoracic aorta-dilated or not?. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2006;40:175–178
  23. da Silva ES, Rodrigues AJ, Castro de Tolosa EM, Bueno Pereira PR, Zanoto A, Martins J. Variation of infrarenal aortic diameter: a necropsy study. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29:920–927
  24. Grimshaw G, Thompson J. Changes in diameter of the abdominal aorta with age: an epidemiological study. Clin Ultrasound. 1997;25:7–13
  25. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Littooy FN, Bandyk D, et al. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Ann Int Med. 1997;126:441–449
  26. Swedvasc Yearly Report 2007. www.swedvasc.se
  27. Svensjö S, Bengtsson H, Bergqvist D. Thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm and dissection: an investigation based on autopsy. Br J Surg. 1996;83:68–71
  28. Alcorn H, Wolfson S, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Kuller L, O’Leary D. Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in older adults enrolled in the cardiovascular health study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:963–970
  29. Nevitt MP, Ballard DJ, Hallett JW. Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (A population-based study). N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1009–1014
  30. Vardulaki KA, Prevost TC, Walker NM, Day NE, Wilmink AB, Quick CR, et al. Growth rates and risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1674–1680
  31. Lindholt JS, Vammen S, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW. Optimal interval screening and surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;20:369–373
  32. McCarthy RJ, Shaw E, Whyman MR, Earnshaw JJ, Poskitt KR, Heather BP. Recommendations for screening intervals for small aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 2003;90:821–826
  33. Coady MA, Rizzo JA, Hammond GL, Mandapati D, Darr U, Kopf GS, et al. What is the appropriate size criterion for resection of thoracic aortic aneurysms?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;113:476–491
  34. Ellis M, Powell J, Greenhalgh R. Limitation of ultrasonography in surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 1991;78:614–616

 Competition of interest: none.

PII: S0741-5214(07)01746-6

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.043

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 47, Issue 3 , Pages 504-512 , March 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution