Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 47, Issue 2 , Pages 372-380 , February 2008

Benign superior vena cava syndrome: Stenting is now the first line of treatment

Presented at the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Society for Vascular Surgery Baltimore, Md, Jun 7-10, 2007.

  • Adnan Z. Rizvi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
  • ,
  • Manju Kalra, MBBS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Manju Kalra, MBBS, Mayo Clinic, Gonda Vascular Center, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
  • ,
  • Haraldur Bjarnason, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
  • ,
  • Thomas C. Bower, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
  • ,
  • Cathy Schleck, BS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
  • ,
  • Peter Gloviczki, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn

Received 4 June 2007 ,Accepted 23 September 2007.

  • Image Result

    Treatment modalities in 70 consecutive patients with benign superior vena cava syndrome over 23 years.

    Treatment modalities in 70 consecutive patients with benign superior vena cava syndrome over 23 years.

  • Image Result

    Secondary interventions required to maintain patency in (A) the open surgical group (n = 42) and (B) the endovascular group (n = 28). The bars represent the percentage of patients in each group, and t

    Secondary interventions required to maintain patency in (A) the open surgical group (n = 42) and (B) the endovascular group (n = 28). The bars represent the percentage of patients in each group, and the line graphs represent the total number of interventions. Secondary interventions in the surgical group include new superior vena cava bypass grafts in two patients after occlusion of the primary grafts.

  • Image Result
    A, Cumulative primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of open surgical reconstruction (n = 42). Range bars represent the standard error of the mean <10%. B, Cumulat

    A, Cumulative primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of open surgical reconstruction (n = 42). Range bars represent the standard error of the mean <10%. B, Cumulative primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates at 1 and 3 years of endovascular repair (n = 28). Range bars represent the standard error of the mean <10%.

  • Image Result
    Grading of symptom relief at last clinical follow-up in patients undergoing open surgical reconstruction (n = 42) or endovascular repair (n = 28).

    Grading of symptom relief at last clinical follow-up in patients undergoing open surgical reconstruction (n = 42) or endovascular repair (n = 28).

 Competition of interest: none.CME article

PII: S0741-5214(07)01598-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.071

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 47, Issue 2 , Pages 372-380 , February 2008