Journal Home
Search for

Volume 46, Issue 6, Supplement, Pages S4-S24 (December 2007)


View previous. 5 of 9 View next.

The hemodynamics and diagnosis of venous disease

Mark H. Meissner, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Gregory Moneta, MDb, Kevin Burnand, MDc, Peter Gloviczki, MDd, Joann M. Lohr, MDe, Fedor Lurie, MDf, Mark A. Mattos, MDg, Robert B. McLafferty, MDh, Geza Mozes, MDi, Robert B. Rutherford, MDi, Frank Padberg, MDj, David S. Sumner, MDh

Received 30 September 2006; accepted 23 August 2007.

The venous system is, in many respects, more complex than the arterial system and a thorough understanding of venous anatomy, pathophysiology, and available diagnostic tests is required in the management of acute and chronic venous disorders. The venous system develops through several stages, which may be associated with a number of development anomalies. A thorough knowledge of lower extremity venous anatomy, anatomic variants, and the recently updated nomenclature is required of all venous practitioners. Effective venous return from the lower extremities requires the interaction of the heart, a pressure gradient, the peripheral muscle pumps of the leg, and competent venous valves. In the absence of pathology, this system functions to reduce venous pressure from approximately 100 mm Hg to a mean of 22 mm Hg within a few steps. The severe manifestations of chronic venous insufficiency result from ambulatory venous hypertension, or a failure to reduce venous pressure with exercise. Although the precise mechanism remains unclear, venous hypertension is thought to induce the associated skin changes through a number of inflammatory mechanisms. Several diagnostic tests are available for the evaluation of acute and chronic venous disease. Although venous duplex ultrasonography has become the standard for detection of acute deep venous thrombosis, adjuvant modalities such as contrast, computed tomographic, and magnetic resonance venography have an increasing role. Duplex ultrasonography is also the most useful test for detecting and localizing chronic venous obstruction and valvular incompetence. However, it provides relatively little quantitative hemodynamic information and is often combined with measurements of hemodynamic severity determined by a number of plethysmographic methods. Finally, critical assessment of venous treatment modalities requires an understanding of the objective clinical outcome and quality of life instruments available.

a Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash

b Department of Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Ore

c Department of Academic Surgery, St Thomas Hospital, London, United Kingdom

d Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn

e Lohr Surgical Specialists, Cincinnati, Ohio

f Straub Foundation and Kistner Vein Clinic, Honolulu, Hawaii

g Department of Surgery, Wayne State University, Seattle, Wash

h Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Ill

i private practice in Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, Tex

j Department of Surgery, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Mark H. Meissner, MD, Department of Surgery, Box 356410, University of Washington Medical Center, 1589 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195.

 Competition of interest: none

PII: S0741-5214(07)01529-7

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.043


View previous. 5 of 9 View next.