« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 46, Issue 6
, Pages 1112-1118.e1
, December 2007
Carotid endarterectomy was performed with lower stroke and death rates than carotid artery stenting in the United States in 2003 and 2004
References
- . ACCULINK review. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf4/p040012a.pdf2007;Accessed Aug 14
- . Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445
- . MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet. 1991;337:1235
- Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1491–1502
- . Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995;273:1421–1428
- Trends, complications, and mortality in peripheral vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:205–216
- Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1493–1501
- Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:258–269
- . High risk plaque, high risk patient, or high risk procedure?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;32:557–560
- . Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy: a Cochrane systematic review of the randomized evidence. Stroke. 2005;36:905–911
- . Re: Reconsideration of carotid artery stenting coverage guidance CAG-00085R3 [letter to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services]. http://www.vascularweb.org/_CONTRIBUTION_PAGES/Reimbursement/CMS_Letter.pdf2007;Accessed Aug 14
- . Regarding “Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: The ARCHeR results.”. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:222–223
- . 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2006;368:1239–1247
- . Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1660–1671
- . Overview. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp2007;Accessed Aug 14
- . Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size. JAMA. 2004;292:847–851
- . National estimates of mortality rates for radical pancreaticoduodenectomy in 25,000 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:847–854
- . Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in patients with the highest risk and in-hospital mortality in the United States. Arch Surg. 2007;142:52–54discussion 524-5
- . International classification of diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1998;
- . Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:3–5
- . Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: an effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:814–821
- . Outcome of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy (A case-control study). Stroke. 2006;37:1221–1226
- . Regarding protected carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:258–268
- Hospital-based factors predict outcome after carotid endarterectomy. J Surg Res. 2006;134:74–80
- . Does the type, number or combinations of traditional cardiovascular risk factors affect early outcome after carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;31:622–626
- . Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias (Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality?). JAMA. 1992;267:2197–2203
- . Assessing hospital-associated deaths from discharge data: the role of length of stay and comorbidities. JAMA. 1988;260:2240–2246
Competition of interest: none.
Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.
PII: S0741-5214(07)01358-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.08.030
© 2007 The Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 46, Issue 6
, Pages 1112-1118.e1
, December 2007
