Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 46, Issue 5 , Pages 883-890.e1 , November 2007

Cost-effectiveness of conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Results of a randomized trial

  • Monique Prinssen, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Erik Buskens, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands and Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Erik Buskens, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30,001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Sjors E. de Jong, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Jacob Buth, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Albert J. Mackaay, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Marc R. Sambeek, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Jan D. Blankensteijn, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • DREAM trial participants

Received 18 January 2007 ,Accepted 23 July 2007.

References 

  1. Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, Cuypers PW, Van Sambeek MR, Balm R, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1607–1618
  2. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:843–848
  3. Blankensteijn JD, De Jong SECA, Prinssen M, van der Ham AC, Buth J, van Sterkenburg SMM, et al. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2398–2405
  4. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:2179–2186
  5. Adriaensen ME, Bosch JL, Halpern EF, Myriam Hunink MG, Gazelle GS. Elective endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: systematic review of short-term results. Radiology. 2002;224:739–747
  6. Lee WA, Carter JW, Upchurch G, Seeger JM, Huber TS. Perioperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States during 2001. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:491–496
  7. Anderson PL, Arons RR, Moskowitz AJ, Gelijns A, Magnell C, Faries PL, et al. A statewide experience with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: rapid diffusion with excellent early results. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:10–19
  8. Geller SC. Imaging guidelines for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with endovascular stent grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:S263–S264
  9. Prinssen M, Wixon CL, Buskens E, Blankensteijn JD. Surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: diagnostics, complications, and associated costs. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004;18:421–427
  10. Aquino RV, Jones MA, Zullo TG, Missig-Carroll N, Makaroun MS. Quality of life assessment in patients undergoing endovascular or conventional AAA repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2001;8:521–528
  11. Lloyd AJ, Boyle J, Bell PR, Thompson MM. Comparison of cognitive function and quality of life after endovascular or conventional aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2000;87:443–447
  12. Lottman PE, Laheij RJ, Cuypers PW, Bender M, Buth J. Health-related quality of life outcomes following elective open or endovascular AAA repair: a randomized controlled trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:323–329
  13. Prinssen M, Buskens E, Blankensteijn JD. Quality of life endovascular and open AAA repair (Results of a randomised trial). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:121–127
  14. Sternbergh WC, Money SR. Hospital cost of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter study. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:237–244
  15. Berman SS, Gentile AT, Berens ES, Haskell J. Institutional economic losses associated with AAA repair are independent of technique. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9:282–288
  16. Dryjski M, O’Brien-Irr MS, Hassett J. Hospital costs for endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:64–70
  17. Patel ST, Haser PB, Bush HL, Kent KC. The cost-effectiveness of endovascular repair versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a decision analysis model. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29:958–971
  18. Bosch JL, Kaufman JA, Beinfeld MT, Adriaensen ME, Brewster DC, Gazelle GS. Abdominal aortic aneurysms: cost-effectiveness of elective endovascular and open surgical repair. Radiology. 2002;225:337–344
  19. Prinssen M, Buskens E, Blankensteijn JD. The Dutch Randomised Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) trial (Background, design and methods). J Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;43:379–384(Torino)
  20. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, Johnston KW, Porter JM, Ahn S, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:517–538
  21. Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, White GH, Zarins CK, Bernhard VM, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1048–1060
  22. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35:1095–1108
  23. Oostenbrink JB, Buijs-Van der Woude T, van Agthoven M, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF. Unit costs of inpatient hospital days. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21:263–271
  24. Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FFH. Standardisation of costs - The Dutch manual for costing in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20:443–454
  25. Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF, van Ineveld BM, van Roijen L. The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. J Health Econ. 1995;14:171–189
  26. van Roijen L, Essink-Bot ML, Koopmanschap MA, Bonsel G, Rutten FF. Labor and health status in economic evaluation of health care (The Health and Labor Questionnaire). Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996;12:405–415
  27. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall; 2003;
  28. Forbes TL, DeRose G, Kribs S, Harris KA. A cost-effectiveness analysis of standard versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Can J Surg. 2002;45:420–424
  29. Becquemin JP, Lapie V, Favre JP, Rousseau H. Mid-term results of a second generation bifurcated endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the French Vanguard trial. J Vasc Surg. 1999;30:209–218
  30. Zarins CK, White RA, Hodgson KJ, Schwarten D, Fogarty TJ. Endoleak as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx multicenter clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:90–107
  31. Rutherford RB. Structural failures in abdominal aortic aneurysm stentgrafts: threat to durability and challenge to technology. Semin Vasc Surg. 2004;17:294–297
  32. Laheij RJ, Buth J, Harris PL, Moll FL, Stelter WJ, Verhoeven EL. Need for secondary interventions after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (Intermediate-term follow-up results of a European collaborative registry (EUROSTAR)). Br J Surg. 2000;87:1666–1673
  33. Torella F. Effect of improved endograft design on outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:216–221

 Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.

 Competition of interest: none.

PII: S0741-5214(07)01196-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.033

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 46, Issue 5 , Pages 883-890.e1 , November 2007