« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 46, Issue 5
, Pages
841-845
, November 2007
Increased aortic arch calcification in patients older than 75 years: Implications for carotid artery stenting in elderly patients
-
Quantification of aortic arch calcium content. Vitrea software (version 2.0) was used to apply the Agatston coronary calcium score. A, The aortic arch of a 54-year-old patient without significant arch
Quantification of aortic arch calcium content. Vitrea software (version 2.0) was used to apply the Agatston coronary calcium score. A, The aortic arch of a 54-year-old patient without significant arch calcium. B, A representative aortic arch of a 77-year-old patient demonstrates diffuse aortic arch calcium content (arrows).
-
Increased aortic arch calcium content correlates with increasing patient age. A, Positive correlation between age and aortic arch calcium content by linear regression (r2 = 0.34; P < .0001). B, The meIncreased aortic arch calcium content correlates with increasing patient age. A, Positive correlation between age and aortic arch calcium content by linear regression (r2 = 0.34; P < .0001). B, The mean calcium score for patients increases by decade in a highly significant fashion (P < .001). *Significant difference compared with patients younger than 50 years of age (P = .03 [70-79 years] or P < .001 [≥80 years]; Scheffé post hoc test). C, Increased arch calcification in patients 75 years or older compared with those less than 75 years old (*P < .001).
-
Aortic arch elongation is associated with a higher calcium content compared with nonelongated arches. *Significant difference (P = .01; unpaired t test).Aortic arch elongation is associated with a higher calcium content compared with nonelongated arches. *Significant difference (P = .01; unpaired t test).
Competition of interest: none.This material is the result of work partially supported by the National Institutes of Health Career Development award HL079927/American Vascular Association William J. von Liebig Award, as well as with resources and the use of facilities at the VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven.CME article
PII: S0741-5214(07)01183-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.06.048
© 2007 The Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 46, Issue 5
, Pages
841-845
, November 2007
