Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 46, Issue 2 , Pages 204-210 , August 2007

Branched iliac bifurcation: 6 years experience with endovascular preservation of internal iliac artery flow

Received 11 February 2007 ,Accepted 3 April 2007.

  • Image Result

    A, First generation iliac bifurcation device. B, Second generation iliac bifurcation device.

    A, First generation iliac bifurcation device. B, Second generation iliac bifurcation device.

  • Image Result

    Angiography through the cross-over sheath confirms satisfactory position and patency of the internal iliac side branch.

    Angiography through the cross-over sheath confirms satisfactory position and patency of the internal iliac side branch.

  • Image Result

    A, Bilateral first generation iliac bifurcation devices incorporated in a Zenith Trifab endograft. B, Final angiography showing patent both internal iliac arteries.

    A, Bilateral first generation iliac bifurcation devices incorporated in a Zenith Trifab endograft. B, Final angiography showing patent both internal iliac arteries.

  • Image Result

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of iliac bifurcation device (IBD) side branch patency (both devices included in the analysis). Analyzed on an intention to treat basis, cumulative IBD side bra

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of iliac bifurcation device (IBD) side branch patency (both devices included in the analysis). Analyzed on an intention to treat basis, cumulative IBD side branch patency was 87.3% at 60 months.

  • Image Result
    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of iliac bifurcation device (IBD) patency (first vs second generation IBD). The Log-rank comparison test for the equality of patency times across groups (first

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of iliac bifurcation device (IBD) patency (first vs second generation IBD). The Log-rank comparison test for the equality of patency times across groups (first vs second generation IBD) showed no statistically significant difference between them (P = .774)

 Competition of interest: none.

PII: S0741-5214(07)00581-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.04.015

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 46, Issue 2 , Pages 204-210 , August 2007