Journal Home
Search for

Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 204-210 (August 2007)


View previous. 14 of 73 View next.

Branched iliac bifurcation: 6 years experience with endovascular preservation of internal iliac artery flow

Peter Ziegler, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Efthimios D. Avgerinos, MD, PhD, Thomas Umscheid, MD, Theodossios Perdikides, MD, Kerstin Erz, MD, Wolf J. Stelter, MD, PhD

Received 11 February 2007; accepted 3 April 2007. published online 30 June 2007.

Objective

The objective of the current study was to share a 6-year experience with the iliac bifurcation device (IBD) and determine its safety and effectiveness in patients with common iliac artery aneurysms.

Methods

Between 2001 and 2006, 46 patients were prospectively enrolled in a single institution study on the IBD. Indications included unilateral or bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAA) (combined or not with abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair). The first 26 patients were intended to receive a first generation unibody IBD and the following 20 patients the second generation, modular, IBD.

Results

In 33 patients out of 46 attempted (technical success per patient 72%), 35 iliac bifurcated devices (2 patients received bilateral IBD) out of 51 attempted (technical success per vessel 69%), were successfully implanted. The technical success rate (per vessel) was 58% for the first generation device and 85% for the second generation device. Inability to introduce the side branch into the IIA and intraoperative occlusions were the main reasons for technical failure. Among these failures, only two patients required open conversions. The mean ± SD follow-up (radiological and clinical) of the 33 patients with a total of 35 successful IBD implantations was 26 ± 17 months (median 24, range 3 to 60). During the follow-up period out of 35 successfully-implanted iliac bifurcation devices, four (11%) hypogastric side branch occlusions occurred, all within the first 12 months. Cumulative IBD side branch patency was 87% at 60 months. Comparing the first with the second generation IBD outcomes, cumulative patency rates at 2 years revealed no statistical difference (P = .774). No endoleak, and particularly no IBD, modular side branch disconnection, no late rupture, or deaths have yet been encountered.

Conclusions

Preservation of pelvic circulation in high risk patients treated for bilateral or unilateral common iliac aneurysms combined or without AAA is feasible and secure exclusively by endovascular repair. New generation iliac bifurcated devices show a favourable intraoperative performance and long-term outcomes.

Städtische Kliniken, Frankfurt a.M. Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Peter Ziegler, MD, Consultant Surgeon and Vascular Surgeon, Städtische Kliniken Frankfurt a.M.-Höchst, Chirurgische Klinik, Gotenstrasse 6, 65929 Frankfurt, Germany

 Competition of interest: none.

PII: S0741-5214(07)00581-2

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.04.015


View previous. 14 of 73 View next.