Journal Home
Search for

Volume 45, Issue 6, Supplement, Pages A2-A7 (June 2007)


View previous. 6 of 25 View next.

Reviving the vascular surgeon–scientist: An interim assessment of the jointly sponsored Lifeline Foundation/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute William J. von Liebig Mentored Clinical Scientist Development (K08) Program

Robert W. Thompson, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Beth Schucker, MSb, K. Craig Kent, MDc, Alexander W. Clowes, MDd, Larry W. Kraiss, MDe, John A. Mannick, MDf, James S.T. Yao, MDg

Received 18 January 2007; accepted 16 February 2007.

The Lifeline Foundation/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute William J. von Liebig Mentored Clinical Scientist Development (K08) Award program was established as a unique partnership to support vascular surgeon–scientists. Between 1999 and 2005, 39 applications were submitted, and the overall funding rate was 49% (14 von Liebig K08s and 5 additional NHLBI K08s). Vascular surgeon K08 recipients (median age, 38 years) had held faculty appointments for 2.5 ± 0.4 years, with 2.6 ± 0.2 years of previous research experience and 28.4 ± 6.2 publications. These individuals subsequently authored 5.1 ± 0.8 peer-reviewed publications per recipient per year, of which 35% were research and 65% were clinical. Six of seven holding the K08 over 3 years had received academic promotion, and all five completing the 5-year award had achieved independent investigator status with National Institutes of Health support. The von Liebig K08 program has therefore been an effective vehicle to stimulate research career development in the field of vascular surgery.

Article Outline

Abstract

Methods

Results

Funding rates

Characteristics of award recipients

Research productivity and transition to independence

Discussion

Conclusion

Acknowledgment

References

Copyright

During the past decade, leaders in the field of vascular surgery have expressed concerns about the viability of research conducted by vascular surgeons, citing diminished federal funding for vascular surgery research, declining involvement of vascular surgeons in laboratory-based investigations, and diminished academic productivity.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Similar concerns have been raised by others in the surgical community on the fate of the surgeon–scientist,7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and physician–scientists have warned of more general trends indicating a broad decline in laboratory research conducted by clinically trained individuals.12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 Despite efforts to alter these trends, academic medical centers have simultaneously faced increasing financial challenges in supporting research career development for clinically trained individuals, and the competition for extramural research funding has continued to grow more rigorous.19, 20, 21, 22, 23

In the early 1970s, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) developed the Mentored Clinical Scientist Development (K08) Award to help support career development in laboratory-based basic and translational research for clinically trained individuals. A similar award mechanism developed for training in patient-oriented research (K23) was implemented in 1999. The K08/K23 awards are designed to provide salary support and research project funds for a period of 3 to 5 years.

During this time, the recipient is engaged in a structured research career development program that includes both advanced didactic training and direct laboratory research experience under the mentorship of a senior scientist. To ensure adequate time to pursue this goal, it is required that a minimum commitment of 75% of total professional effort be applied to the research career development program. For many clinical specialties, the salary provisions of the K08/K23 award do not match the fiscal deficit created by the required 75% effort, thereby leaving a substantial funding gap to support research career development.

A new approach to supplement the K08 award in the field of vascular surgery was developed in 1999 by the Lifeline Foundation of the Society for Vascular Surgery (now the American Vascular Association [AVA]) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), which resulted in the establishment of the William J. von Liebig K08 award program. This report evaluates the results and impact of the von Liebig K08 program during the first 6 years of its implementation.

Methods 

return to Article Outline

The von Liebig K08 program was designated for individuals holding a faculty appointment in vascular surgery and meeting the review and funding criteria for NHLBI K08 awards, based on applications submitted simultaneously to both NHLBI and the Lifeline Foundation in June of each year. Initial peer review and priority scoring was conducted by the special emphasis panel responsible for all NHLBI K-series applications, followed by secondary review and funding decisions by the NHLBI Advisory Council. Applicants successfully awarded NHLBI K08 funding were then reviewed by the Lifeline Foundation Research and Education Committee, and up to two individuals each year were selected to receive the supplemental salary support of the von Liebig K08 award. This additional salary stipend was designated in the amount necessary to achieve twice the annual total of salary support otherwise provided by the NHLBI K08 award.

The funding outcomes for all applications submitted to the von Liebig K08 program from 1999 to 2005 were tabulated from a review of AVA and NHLBI records, and overall funding rates for K08 awards were obtained from the NHLBI. The characteristics of successfully funded vascular surgeon K08 applicants and assessment of their research productivity were based on personal communication and review of individual curricula vitae that they provided. Peer-reviewed publications before and after the year of the K08 award were obtained by a search of the National Library of Medicine PubMed database, and original scientific publications were classified as being related to laboratory research or to clinical topics. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the characteristics of the vascular surgeon K08 recipient cohort (means are presented ± the standard error).

Results 

return to Article Outline

Funding rates 

Between 1999 and 2005, 39 applications were submitted to the von Liebig K08 program (annual median, 6; range, 3 to 7). Of these, 14 applicants (36%) received the von Liebig K08 award, and five additional applicants (13%) received NHLBI K08 awards (all for 5 years’ duration), for an overall funding rate of 49% (median annual funding rate, 50%; Table I). During the same time period, the aggregate funding rate for all K08 applications submitted to NHLBI was 41% (annual range, 32% to 47%).

Table I.

Funding outcomes for vascular surgeon K08 award applicants, 1999 to 2005

Year of awardApplicants, nAwards funded von Liebig K08, n (%)Other NHLBI K08 awards, n (%)Total K08, n (%)
199962(33)1(20)3/6(50)
200072(29)0(0)2/7(29)
200162(33)0(0)2/6(33)
200262(33)2(33)4/6(50)
200342(50)0(0)2/4(50)
200472(29)2(29)4/7(57)
200532(66)0(0)2/3(66)
Totals3914/39(36)5/39(13)19/39(49)

NHLBI, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

The number of vascular surgeons submitting applications for the von Liebig K08 award program is listed for each year from 1999 through 2005, along with the number and percentage of applications funded (the number of applicants refers to those submitted during the previous calendar year). Other NHLBI K08 awards refers to K08 applications submitted by vascular surgeons for the von Liebig K08 program that received funding by NHLBI but not the von Liebig Award supplement.

Characteristics of award recipients 

Vascular surgeon K08 recipients included 16 with an MD degree (84%) and three with a combined MD/PhD degree (16%; Table II). All had completed a general surgical residency (median duration, 5.0 years; range, 5 to 7 years; mean, 5.2 ± 0.1 years) and a vascular surgery fellowship (median duration, 1.0 years; range, 1 to 2 years; mean, 1.2 ± 0.1 years). The median duration of faculty appointment (all at assistant professor level) was 2.0 years (range, 0 to 7 years; mean, 2.5 ± 0.4 years), and the median age at the time of the K08 application was 38.0 years (range, 34 to 42 years; mean, 37.6 ± 0.5 years). All vascular surgeon K08 recipients were engaged in an academic vascular surgery practice, with direct patient care responsibilities encompassing no more than 25% of total professional effort.

Table II.

Characteristics of vascular surgeon K08 recipients, 1999 to 2005

N = 19 (%) Median (range)Mean
Age at application (years) 38.0(34-42)37.6±0.5
Years in faculty appointment 2.0(0-7)2.5±0.4
Degree
MD16(84.2)
MD/PhD3(15.8)
Previous clinical training (years)
Clinical residency 5.0(5-7)5.2±0.1
Clinical fellowship 1.0(1-2)1.2±0.1
Total clinical training 6.0(6-8)6.3±0.1
Previous research training
Research during residency18(94.7)
Duration (years) 2.0(0-4)1.9±0.2
Research during fellowship13(68.4)
Duration(years) 1.0(0-1)0.7±0.1
Research during both12(63.2)
Total research (years) 2.5(1-5)2.6±0.2
Previous peer-reviewed publications
Laboratory research 10.0(2-95)15.2±4.7
Clinical research/topics 8.0(2-61)13.2±3.2
Total publications 21.0(9-116)28.4±6.2
Previous research funding
As a trainee
All sources9(47.4)
NHLBI F32 or T326(31.6)
American Heart Association3(15.8)
Surgical foundation/society2(10.5)
As a faculty member
All sources9(47.4)

NHLBI, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

The median amount of previous research training for vascular surgeon K08 recipients was 2.5 years (range, 1 to 5 years; mean, 2.6 ± 0.2 years). Eighteen recipients (95%) had performed laboratory-based research during general surgery residency (median duration, 2.0 years; range, 0 to 4 years; mean, 1.9 ± 0.2 years) and 13 (68%) during vascular surgery fellowship (median duration, 1.0 years; range, 0 to 1 years; mean, 0.7 ± 0.1 years). Twelve individuals (63%) had performed research during both residency and fellowship. Six of the recipients (32%) had received previous NIH support through an individual (F32) or institutional (T32) National Research Service Award (NRSA) during the time of their research training, three (16%) had held an award from the American Heart Association, and two (11%) had obtained scholarship funding through a nonprofit surgical foundation or academic society. The median number of peer-reviewed publications per recipient before the year of K08 application was 21.0 (range, 9 to 116; mean, 28.4 ± 6.2), including 10.0 research papers (range, 2 to 95; mean, 15.2 ± 4.7) and 8.0 clinical papers (range, 2 to 61; mean, 13.2 ± 3.2).

Vascular surgeon K08 recipients tended to be affiliated with academic institutions characterized by a well-developed research infrastructure, and all had been provided with appropriate time, laboratory space, and start-up research funding as part of their initial faculty appointment. Nine of the recipients (47%) had obtained nonfederal extramural research support before the year of initiating the K08 award from other sources, including the American College of Surgeons, the American Heart Association, the American Surgical Association, the Association for Academic Surgery, the Howard Hughes Foundation for Medical Research, the Lifeline Foundation, the Pacific Vascular Research Foundation, the Society of University Surgeons, and the Whitaker Foundation, as well as corporate and industry sponsors.

The research topics investigated by vascular surgeon K08 recipients covered a broad spectrum of problems related to basic vascular biology and peripheral vascular disease (Table III). Primary research mentors included MD (46%) and PhD (54%) scientists with principal appointments in basic science or clinical departments. All of these research mentors were productive senior scientists with independent NIH R01 funding, a solid track record of research training experience, and a well-established relationship with the vascular surgeon K08 recipient.

Table III.

Research topics of vascular surgeon K08 recipients, 1999 to 2005

TopicYear
Genetic engineering of a failure resistant vein graft1999
Control of endothelial translation by fluid shear stress1999
Modulating endothelial adaptation to flow1999
Inflammatory mechanisms of neointimal hyperplasia2000
Nitric oxide and smooth muscle cell proliferation2000
uPA receptor signaling and cell migration2001
MMP-9-dependent vessel wall remodeling is NO-dependent2001
Bone morphogenetic proteins in arterial remodeling2002
Thrombus resolution is CXC chemokine dependent2002
Collagen-binding integrins in intimal hyperplasia2002
The chemokine system in collateral artery formation2002
Measuring the efficacy of endovascular treatment of AAA2003
Collagen-IV remodeling in ischemic leg revascularization2004
Mechanisms of shear-regulated vein graft remodeling2004
Role of progenitor cells in hindlimb revascularization2002
Homocysteine/hypertension and vascular lesion formation2004
mTOR regulation of VSMC differentiation2004
Mitochondriopathy of chronically ischemic muscle2005
A tissue-engineered, small-diameter vascular graft2005

uPA, Urokinase-type plasminogen activator; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; NO, nitric oxide; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cells.

Research productivity and transition to independence 

Between January 1999 and December 2005, vascular surgeon K08 recipients contributed a cumulative total of 460 peer-reviewed publications to the literature, including 161 (35%) on laboratory research and 299 (65%) on clinical topics (Table IV). During the award period, each K08 recipient published a mean of 5.1 ± 0.8 articles per year (median, 5.5), including 1.9 ± 0.3 per year on laboratory research (median, 2.0) and 3.3 ± 0.6 per year on clinical topics (median, 3.5).

Table IV.

Peer-reviewed publications by vascular surgeon K08 recipients, 1999 to 2005

All Publications as Author/Co-Author
Year of Award1999200020012002200320042005Total
Cum. number of recipients35711131719
Total publications514356183138124460
Research (% of total)2(40)5(36)17(49)22(36)22(27)46(33)47(38)161(35)
Clinical (% of total)3(60)9(64)18(51)39(64)61(73)92(67)77(62)299(65)
Publications per recipient1.72.85.05.56.48.16.55.5
Research0.71.02.42.01.72.72.52.0
Clinical1.01.82.63.54.75.44.13.5
First/Last author publications during period of K08 awardn (%)Mean
Total publications174
Research publications, n (% of total)67(38)
Clinical publications, n (% of total)107(62)
Publications per recipient per year
Total 2.3±0.6
Research publications 0.8±0.2
Clinical publications 1.6±0.5

Median

Mean ± standard error.

When publications during the period of award were assessed to include only those in which the vascular surgeon K08 recipient was either the first or last author, the cumulative total was 174 publications, including 67 (38%) on laboratory research and 107 (62%) on clinical topics (Table IV). The mean rate of first/last author publications after receipt of the K08 award was 2.3 ± 0.6 per recipient per year distributed as 0.8 ± 0.2 research publications and 1.6 ± 0.5 clinical publications.

By December 2005, nine (47%) of the 19 vascular surgeon K08 recipients had received promotion to associate professor of surgery with tenure during the period of the award, including all seven of those holding the K08 for at least 3 years. Five (26%) of the 19 recipients also held joint faculty appointments in a basic science department or graduate school.

As of June 2005, four recipients of the von Liebig K08 award and one recipient of an NHLBI K08 award had completed the 5 years of mentored research training supported by the award. All five of these individuals subsequently achieved independent investigator status, with three receiving NIH R01 research project grant support and two serving as individual project leaders on NIH program project grants. In addition, four other vascular surgeon K08 recipients had submitted NIH R01 applications by December 2005, with one obtaining independent funding and three others awaiting review and funding decisions. As of December 2005, four of the vascular surgeon K08 recipients had been invited to serve as members of an NIH initial review panel (study section) or research advisory committee.

Discussion 

return to Article Outline

Several interrelated factors have contributed to the decline in the number of surgeon investigators during the past two decades (Table V). The working hypothesis in developing the von Liebig K08 program was (1) that the most vulnerable period for the academic vascular surgeon occurs within the first 3 to 5 years of faculty appointment, and (2) that adequate and realistic salary support during this time would provide young vascular surgeon–scientists the stimulus and means to launch effective, competitive, and sustainable laboratory research programs. The Lifeline Foundation and NHLBI leadership thereby constructed the von Liebig K08 program to emphasize the importance of structured research mentorship and to foster greater familiarity with NIH peer-review and funding processes. This structure also permitted applicants who were sufficiently competitive for NHLBI K08 awards to receive funding, even when the foundation funds available permitted no more than two individuals each year to receive the von Liebig K08 salary supplement.

Table V.

Factors contributing to the decline in National Institutes of Health funding for surgeon–scientists


1.Fewer applications submitted for NIH grants by surgeons than other medical specialties

2.Applications submitted by surgeons less competitive than those from other investigators

3.Limited representation of surgeons on NIH study sections, panels, and councils

4.Deficiency and instability in the surgical research workforce (quality and quantity)

a)Diminishing opportunity for surgical residents to engage in research

b)Long discontinuities between initial research training and faculty appointment

c)Competing clinical productivity demands during early career development

d)Mid-career surgeons unable to commit sufficient effort to sustain independent research

e)Few established surgical investigators remain in research throughout their careers


The results presented here indicate that the von Liebig K08 program has been a highly successful vehicle in stimulating research career development in vascular surgery. First, it is notable that beginning with the first year of the program, a substantial number of K08 applications have been submitted by vascular surgeons each year (range, 3 to 7). This indicates that under current training paradigms, the pool of potential vascular surgeon–scientists—those with adequate training, initial support, and interest in establishing research-based careers—has likely been sufficient.24

Second, vascular surgeon K08 applicants were funded at a slightly higher rate than the NHLBI average for K08 awards during the same time period (49% vs 41%), indicating that these applicants were equally competitive in this arena with applicants from other medical specialties. This counters the perception that vascular surgeons engaged in laboratory-based research might not be sufficiently competitive with their peers in other specialties and reinforces the view that an increase in funded vascular surgeons could be achieved if given an ample incentive to prepare and submit applications for funding.

Third, vascular surgeon K08 recipients were highly productive during the course of the award period, as indicated by a steady rate of peer-reviewed publications and research presentations, emerging national recognition, procurement of additional research support, and academic promotion. Even by relatively early measures these individuals have already made important contributions to the field of vascular surgery, and their ongoing involvement in research-based activities is a hopeful sign for the next generation of academic leaders in the specialty.

Although still too early to draw firm conclusions, it appears that by several measures the von Liebig K08 program is already achieving its intended long-term impact. Thus, all vascular surgeon K08 recipients who completed the 5-year period of mentored research have emerged to achieve independent investigator status, and several more appear poised to follow. It is also notable that within their respective institutions, each of these individuals has played an important role in collaborative scientific programs and in mentoring research experiences for medical students, surgical residents, and vascular surgery fellows, thereby stimulating further interest in vascular disease. The active participation of vascular surgeon K08 recipients in other NIH activities (study sections, advisory panels, and conferences) is also apparent, and this level of broader involvement will continue to be vital in sustaining the wider visibility and influence of vascular surgeon-scientists. The von Liebig K08 program has thereby proven to be a wise and fruitful investment by the vascular surgery community.

The NIH K-series awards would appear to represent an ideal funding mechanism to help meet the increasing challenge of research career development for clinician–scientists, being specifically designated for clinically trained individuals conducting mentored laboratory-based (K08) or patient-oriented (K23) research. Because the provisions of the NIH K08/K23 awards require a research training commitment of 75% of total professional effort, and because for many specialties the amount of salary provided is less than half the Association of American Medical Colleges median salary for individuals holding an appointment at the assistant professor level, there remains a significant fiscal discrepancy that may discourage investigators from seeking this means of support. The salary supplement provided by the von Liebig K08 award was designed to offset this discrepancy, thereby allowing the recipient to commit the required 75% effort to research career development while maintaining a reasonable measure of clinical activity. It is notable that this amount of clinical activity is considered a crucial provision for technically-demanding and rapidly-evolving specialties such as vascular surgery, in which junior faculty members must maintain and extend clinical capabilities acquired during training, establish credibility as attending physicians and surgeons, and adopt new technical skills with emerging endovascular procedures, all alongside the development of research expertise.

Conclusion 

return to Article Outline

The von Liebig K08 program serves as one example of a successful partnership between private and public sectors to meet the ongoing challenges of research career development. This paradigm has recently been emulated to develop a similar K23 program for patient-oriented research in vascular surgery, and by salary-matching K08/K23 programs offered by other clinical specialties, such as cardiothoracic surgery and trauma surgery. Other potential solutions to stimulating research career development should also be considered and pursued, particularly to offset the disproportionate amounts of clinical activity between different medical and surgical specialties.25 For example, it might be feasible (and cost-neutral) to consider reducing the 75% effort requirement for K-series awards, perhaps to 50%, at least for certain clinically intense specialties. Another reasonable strategy would be to allow the proportionate percent effort for K-series awards to be calculated on the basis of a 40-hour workweek, rather than the percent of “total professional activity” as calculated at present. For an academic surgeon with professional demands that otherwise typically encompass 80 hours per week, this approach would permit a commitment of 30 hours per week to the K08/K23 program yet allow a considerable amount of remaining time for clinical practice and other professional activity. This approach also has the advantage that it would be equitable for all clinicians, regardless of specialty, thereby helping to restore equilibrium to a funding system that currently disfavors individuals in clinically demanding specialties.

 

return to Article Outline

We are grateful to Ms Sarah Murphy (American Vascular Association, Chicago, IL) for assistance in preparing this report and to the vascular surgeon K08 recipients for providing essential data.

References 

return to Article Outline

1. 1Yao JST. Research and research funding in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 1990;12:84–90. Full Text | Full-Text PDF (726 KB) | CrossRef

2. 2Stanley JC. Vascular fellowships and laboratory research. J Vasc Surg. 1991;13:551–554. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (323 KB) | CrossRef

3. 3Greisler HP. The hour is getting late. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:795–804. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (156 KB) | CrossRef

4. 4Abbott WM. Legend, leadership, legacy. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29:1–7. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (81 KB) | CrossRef

5. 5Yao JST, Mannick J. Lifeline Foundation and National Institutes of Health. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:1237–1238.

6. 6Galt SW, Kraiss LW, Sarfati MR. Has the changing nature of vascular surgery adversely affected scholarly activity?. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:1–6. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (123 KB) | CrossRef

7. 7Graham LM. Surgical research: facing new realities. Surgery. 1995;118:123–129. Full-Text PDF (735 KB) | CrossRef

8. 8Souba WW, Tanabe KK, Gadd MA, Smith BL, Bushman MS. Attitudes and opinions toward surgical research: a survey of surgical residents and their chairpersons. Ann Surg. 1996;223:377–383. MEDLINE | CrossRef

9. 9Dunn JC, Lai EC, Brooks CM, Stabile BE, Fonkalsrud EW. The outcome of research training during surgical residency. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33:362–364. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (294 KB) | CrossRef

10. 10Ko CY, Whang EE, Longmire WP, McFadden DW. Improving the surgeon’s participation in research: is it a problem of training or priority?. J Surg Res. 2000;91:5–8. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (47 KB) | CrossRef

11. 11Jones RS, Debas HT. Research: a vital component of optimal patient care in the United States. Ann Surg. 2004;240:573–577. MEDLINE

12. 12Wyngaarden JB. The clinical investigator as an endangered species. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:1254–1259. MEDLINE

13. 13Cadman EC. The academic physician-investigator: a crisis not to be ignored. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:401–410. MEDLINE

14. 14Goldstein JL, Brown MS. The clinical investigator: bewitched, bothered, and bewildered- but still beloved. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2803–2812. MEDLINE | CrossRef

15. 15Schrier RW. Ensuring the survival of the clinician-scientist. Acad Med. 1997;72:589–594. MEDLINE

16. 16Rosenberg LE. The physician-scientist: an essential and fragile link in the medical research chain. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:1621–1626. MEDLINE | CrossRef

17. 17Zemlo TR, Garrison HH, Partridge NC, Ley TJ. The physician-scientist: career issues and challenges at the year 2000. FASEB J. 2000;14:221–230. MEDLINE

18. 18Lenfant C. Training the next generation of biomedical researchers: challenges and opportunities. Circulation. 2000;102:368–371.

19. 19Rangel SJ, Efron B, Moss L. Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding of surgical research. Ann Surg. 2002;236:277–287. MEDLINE | CrossRef

20. 20Rangel SJ, Moss RL. Recent trends in the funding and utilization of NIH career development awards by surgical faculty. Surgery. 2004;136:232–239. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (220 KB) | CrossRef

21. 21Jackson HH, Jackson JD, Mulvihill SJ, Firpo MA, Glasgow RE. Trends in research support and productivity in the changing environment of academic surgery. J Surg Res. 2004;116:197–201. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (124 KB) | CrossRef

22. 22Debas HT, Bass BL, Brennan MF, Flynn TC, Folse JR, Freischlag JA, et al. American Surgical Association blue ribbon committee report on surgical education: 2004. Ann Surg. 2005;241:1–8. MEDLINE

23. 23Ley TJ, Rosenberg LE. The physician-scientist career pipeline in 2005: build it, and they will come. JAMA. 2005;294:1343–1351. CrossRef

24. 24Henke PK, Kish P, Stanley JC. Relevance of basic laboratory and clinical research activities as part of the vascular surgery fellowship: an assessment by program directors and postfellowship surgeons. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:1083–1091. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (372 KB) | CrossRef

25. 25Zelenock GB, Stanley JC, More RA, Greenfield LJ, Shanley CJ, Jacobs LA. Differential clinical workloads among faculty at a major academic health center. Ann Surg. 1997;226:336–345. MEDLINE | CrossRef

a Departments of Surgery (Section of Vascular Surgery), Radiology, and Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo

b formerly of Research Training and Special Programs Scientific Research Group, Division of Heart and Vascular Diseases, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-NIH, Bethesda, Md

c Division of Vascular Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and New York Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY

d Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash

e Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

f Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass

g Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Robert W. Thompson, MD, Section of Vascular Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 5101 Queeny Tower, One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63110.

 Competition of interest: none.

Sponsored by the Research and Education Committee of the American Vascular Association (a Foundation of the Society for Vascular Surgery), the William J. von Liebig Foundation, and the Research Training and Special Programs Scientific Research Group, Division of Heart and Vascular Diseases, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

PII: S0741-5214(07)00333-3

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.045


View previous. 6 of 25 View next.