Journal Home
Search for

Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 1128-1135 (June 2007)


View previous. 12 of 65 View next.

Hybrid approach to thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with prior aortic surgery

Roberto Chiesa, MD, Yamume Tshomba, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Germano Melissano, MD, Enrico M. Marone, MD, Luca Bertoglio, MD, Francesco Setacci, MD, Fabio M. Calliari, MD

Received 9 July 2006; accepted 21 October 2006.

Objective

The hybrid approach to the repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA), consisting of visceral aortic debranching with retrograde revascularization of the splanchnic and renal arteries and aneurysm exclusion using stent grafts, has been previously described and may be considered particularly appealing in high-risk patients, especially those who have undergone prior aortic surgery. This study analyzed prospectively recorded data of a series of high-risk patients with prior aortic surgery who underwent hybrid TAAA repair at our institute and contrasted the outcomes with those of a similar group of patients who underwent conventional open TAAA repair.

Methods

Between 2001 and 2006, 13 patients (12 men) with a median age of 69.6 years (range, 35 to 82 years) underwent one-stage hybrid repair of TAAA (7 type I, 2 type II, 2 type IV, and 2 aneurysms of the visceral aortic patch). These patients, the hybrid group, had a history of aortic surgery (30.7% ascending, 30.7% descending, 46.1% abdominal aortic repair, and 15.4% redo TAAA) and were at high risk for open repair. The criteria used to define these patients as high risk and to indicate the need for hybrid treatment were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3 or 4 associated with a preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) <50%. In all cases, we accomplished partial or total visceral aortic debranching through (1) a previous visceral artery retrograde revascularization with synthetic grafts (single bypass, customized Y or bifurcated grafts), and (2) aortic endovascular repair with one of three different commercially produced stent grafts (Cook, W.L. Gore & Assoc, and Medtronic). We analyzed the results and compared the outcomes of the hybrid group with those of a similar group of 29 patients (25 men) with a median age 65.3 years (range, 58 to 79) selected from our overall series of 246 TAAA repairs between 1988 and 2005. These 29 patients, the conventionally treated group, were selected for having had aortic surgery (22% ascending, 38% descending, 42% abdominal aortic repair, and 10.3% redo TAAA), an ASA 3 or 4, a preoperative FEV1 <50%, and a conventional open repair of TAAA (10 type I, 5 type II, 4 type III, 7 type IV, and 3 aneurysms of the visceral aortic patch).

Results

In the hybrid group, 32 visceral bypasses were completed and endovascular TAAA repair was successful in all cases. No intraoperative deaths occurred. Perioperative mortality was 23%, and morbidity was 30.8% (renal failure in 2, respiratory failure in 1, and delayed transient paraplegia in 1). At a median follow-up of 14.9 months (range, 11 days to 59.4 months), all grafts were patent at postoperative computed tomography angiography and no aneurysm-related deaths, endoleak, stent graft migration, or morbidity related to visceral revascularization had occurred. No conventionally treated patients died intraoperatively. Perioperative mortality was 17.2% and morbidity was 44.8% (respiratory failure in 7, coagulopathy in 1, renal failure in 2, and paraplegia in 3). At a median follow-up of 5.4 years (range, 1.7 to 7.9 years), no significant complications related to aortic repair occurred, except for three patients (10.3%) with asymptomatic dilatation of the visceral aortic patch <5 cm undergoing radiologic surveillance.

Conclusion

Hybrid TAAA repair is technically feasible in selected cases. Perioperative morbidity and mortality were considerable in our subset of high-risk patients with prior aortic surgery, but no aneurysm-related or procedure-related complications were reported at mid-term follow-up. Hybrid TAAA repair did not lead to a significant improvement in outcomes compared with open TAAA repair in a similar group of patients. Larger series are required for valid statistical comparisons and longer follow-ups are necessary to evaluate the durability of hybrid repairs.

Article Outline

Abstract

Patients and methods

Hybrid group

Conventionally treated group

Results

Hybrid group

Conventionally treated group

Discussion

Conclusions

Author contributions

References

Copyright

Open surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) has evolved significantly over the last decades thanks to technologic and technical improvements, especially in the area of organ protection. Moreover, patients with severe cardiopulmonary comorbidity and those who have undergone prior aortic surgery, especially in the case of redo TAAA repair,1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 are at increased risk during conventional surgical repair using the inclusion technique proposed by Crawford in 1978. These operations remain formidable, however, and only high-volume centers have been able to reproduce the acceptable results reported in the literature.24

Endovascular repair of TAAA by means of branched endografts would offer major advantages, and the feasibility of this technique has already been demonstrated.7, 8 Nevertheless, progress in this field is very slow, and the availability of this technology is currently limited to a handful of institutions that are conducting investigational studies.

A hybrid approach consisting of visceral aortic debranching with retrograde revascularization of the splanchnic and renal arteries and aneurysm exclusion using commercially available stent grafts has been described in several reports.10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 This study prospectively analyzed recorded data of a series of high-risk patients with a history of aortic surgery who underwent a hybrid repair of TAAA at our institute in the last 5 years and compared the outcomes in this group with those in a similar group of patients who underwent conventional open repair of TAAA.

Patients and methods 

return to Article Outline

Between 1988 and 2005, 246 patients (189 men) with a median age of 64 years (range, 34 to 83 years) underwent TAAA open repair at our institution. The overall perioperative mortality was 10.2%, and morbidity was 44.3%.

Hybrid group 

Beginning in 2001, 13 high-risk patients (12 men) with a median age of 69.6 years (range, 35 to 82 years) underwent one-stage TAAA stent graft repair with visceral aortic debranching and prior retrograde revascularization of visceral arteries (Fig 1). The criteria we used to define these patients as being at high-risk for conventional TAAA repair were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3 or 4 associated with a preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) <50%. These patients’ data were prospectively collected in a computerized database.


View full-size image.

Fig 1. A, Preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan shows a type II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) in a previous unsuccessful attempt of open and endovascular thoracic aneurysm repair. B, Intraoperative photograph shows the creation of an infrarenal neck with grafting of aneurysmatic aorta and two customized Y grafts directed to the renal arteries, the celiac trunk and the superior mesenteric artery. C, Postoperative CTA and drawing D, shows patency of the Y grafts and correct deployment of the thoracoabdominal endograft with complete aneurysm exclusion of the TAAA.


The mean aneurysm size was 7.3 cm (range, 6.4 to 12 cm). One patient underwent emergency surgery because of TAAA rupture. Anatomic inclusion criteria for the hybrid repair procedure were a minimum proximal aortic neck length of 20 mm in the descending aorta, the possibility of an adjunctive visceral open reconstruction to be effective in lengthening the distal aortic neck in the visceral or infrarenal aorta to a minimum of 15 mm, and an aortic neck diameter allowing 15% to 20% oversizing in the absence of circumferential thrombus or calcifications.

In all cases, 16-row multislice computed tomography (CT) with 1-mm intervals and multiplanar reconstructions (Aquilion 16; Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) was performed for planning and sizing. The extent of the TAAA, the proximal and distal landing zones,16 revascularized visceral arteries, and stent graft used are summarized in Table I.

Table I.

Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm extent, proximal and distal stent graft landing zones, revascularized visceral arteries and deployed endografts in the 11 patients underwent hybrid repair

TAAA, Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm; CT, celiac trunk; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; RRA, right renal artery; LRA, left renal artery, VAP, visceral aortic patch.

The proximal landing zones according to the Ishimaru classification16 are shown in the drawing below the table. Zone 0: overstenting of all the supra-aortic trunks; zone 1:over-stenting of left sublavian and left common carotid arteries; zone 2: overstenting of the left subclavian artery; zone 3 and 4 distal to the left subclavian artery. Regarding the distal landing zones classification we considered, as shown in the drawing below the table, as zone 0, the overstenting of all visceral aortic branches; as zone 1, the overstenting of the celiac trunk, of the superior mesenteric artery, and of the higher renal artery; as zone 2, the overstenting of the celiac trunk and of the superior mesenteric artery; as zone 3, the overstenting of the sole celiac trunk; and as zone 4 the stent graft repair proximal to the celiac trunk.

All of the patients underwent a one-stage procedure performed in the operating room. Preoperative cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) drainage was performed in five selected patients in whom a long segment of native descending aorta was planned to be covered by the stent graft (1 type II TAAA with prior abdominal aortic repair, 1 type II TAAA with prior ascending aortic repair, and 3 type I TAAA with prior abdominal aortic repair). CSF drainage was not performed preoperatively in the other patients who had a long segment of already grafted thoracic aorta (4 type I TAAA with previous descending aortic repair and 1 aneurysm of visceral aortic patch in a prior type II TAAA repair) or had a type IV TAAA (2 with prior abdominal aortic repair). CSF drainage was instituted postoperatively in one patient with an aneurysm of the visceral aortic patch (prior type III TAAA repair) when delayed symptoms of spinal cord ischemia developed.

A portable digital C-arm image intensifier with road-mapping capabilities (series 9600, OEC Medical System or Moonray, Simad Medical Technology, Modena, Italy) was used. All the patients were operated on under general and epidural anesthesia. Cell salvage, rapid infusers, and transfusion were used. The abdominal aorta, common iliac arteries, and the first 2 cm from the origin of the common hepatic artery, superior mesenteric artery, and renal arteries were exposed, when required, through a transperitoneal mid-line approach with the patient in a supine position.

The choice of inflow site for retrograde visceral artery bypass grafting was based on the extent of the TAAA, the presence of prior abdominal aortic repair, and the quality of the walls of the native aorta and iliac arteries. In seven of eight cases with pre-existing abdominal aortic grafts for prior infrarenal aortic repair (n = 5) or TAAA repair (n = 2) the retrograde grafts were anastomosed to the previous aortic graft to avoid clamping and an anastomosis on atherosclerotic arteries. Only in one case was a pre-existing abdominal aortic graft for a prior infrarenal aortic repair not used as the inflow site owing to the good quality and favorable anatomic features of the right common iliac artery that was used as the donor vessel (Fig 2).


View full-size image.

Fig 2. A,Preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) shows a type I thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) in a previous AAA repair. B, Intraoperative photograph shows the detail of the customized Y graft directed to the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery from the right common iliac artery. Postoperative CTA shows patency of the Y graft and correct deployment just above the renal arteries with aneurysm exclusion of the TAAA of the thoracoabdominal endograft.


Among the five patients who had not undergone prior abdominal aortic grafting, the native abdominal aortic wall was of good quality in two cases, enabling us to use it as the donor vessel. In another two patients, we preferred to use the right common iliac artery as the donor vessel because of the better quality of the wall of this artery and its favorable anatomy. A one-stage procedure was done in another patient in which an AAA was first repaired with a tube graft, and then visceral bypass grafts were anastomosed to the distal part of the infrarenal graft, allowing an adequate in-graft distal endograft landing zone. All the anastomoses to the donor vessels were created in an end-to-side fashion.

Overall, 32 retrograde visceral bypasses were performed (13 to the celiac trunk, 13 to the superior mesenteric artery, and 6 to renal arteries). Synthetic grafts (Dacron or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene) with diameters of 6 mm and 8 mm were used in all patients. We preferably used customized Y grafts or separated bypass grafts, or both, for each recipient vessel. We used a single bypass with a sequential graft technique in one patient, and an inverted bifurcated graft in another. For celiac trunk revascularization, the graft was routed in front of the renal vein behind the pancreas, an arteriotomy was made in the common hepatic artery, and an end-to-side anastomosis was made. An end-to-end anastomosis was usually preferred for the superior mesenteric artery, and this type of anastomosis was always used for the renal arteries.

Before and during renal artery cross-clamping, diuresis was forced by systemic infusions of furosemide and mannitol (0.5 g/kg). During the cross-clamping, a bolus of 300 mL of cold (4°C) crystalloid lactated Ringer solution was perfused into the orifice of the renal artery with a 9F Pruitt-Inahara (LeMaitre Vascular, St. Petersburg, Fla) occlusion perfusion balloon catheter. A continuous perfusion of approximately 500 mL was then administered to reduce the temperature of the kidney to 15°C to 18°C.

In all reconstructions, the grafted vessels were ligated proximally to prevent retrograde perfusion of the sac after endovascular exclusion of the aneurysm. The grafts were then covered with retroperitoneum or omental flap whenever possible.

The access vessel for endograft insertion was the common femoral artery (exposed through an inguinal incision) in four patients, an iliac approach was used in three patients, and the device was inserted through the infrarenal aorta in 6 patients. No conduit was used for inserting the endograft, and the access sites were repaired by direct suture or by a synthetic patch chosen according to the size and the quality of the artery.

A variety of stent grafts were used, including Zenith (Cook, Bloomington, Ind), Excluder (W.L. Gore & Assoc, Flagstaff, Ariz), and Talent (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn), and a median of 1.5 stent grafts (range, 1 to 3) were deployed in each patient.

One patient undergoing long-term dialysis had intentional over-stenting of both the renal arteries, and two patients with a right solitary functioning kidney had intentional over-stenting of the left renal arteries (higher) without revascularization. A completion aortograph was done after deployment of the endografts. Stent graft ballooning was performed selectively.

Patients were evaluated with postprocedure contrast CT scans at scheduled follow-up imaging at 1, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Clinical follow-up was also done at regular intervals of 6 months.

Conventionally treated group 

From the entire series of patients who had undergone TAAA repair since 1988, we selected 29 patients (25 men), with a median age of 65.3 years (range, 58 to 79 years), who had had an open repair of TAAA (10 type I, 5 type II, 4 type III, 7 type IV, and 3 aneurysms of the visceral aortic patch) after prior aortic surgery (22% ascending, 38% descending, 42% abdominal aortic repair, and 10.3% redo TAAA), at ASA 3 or 4, and preoperative FEV1 <50%.

These patients’ data had been prospectively collected in a computerized database and are reported in Table II. The median aneurysm size was 8.1 cm (range, 5.9 to 9.3 cm). All the procedures were performed electively.

Table II.

Preoperative characteristics of the 29 patients with prior aortic surgery who underwent conventional repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm

PatientsASAPrior surgery sitesTAAA Crawford extentVisceral arteries management
13TAAAVAPaneurysm3vesselVAP
23TAAAVAPaneurysmVesselselectivereimplant
33TAAAVAPaneurysm4vesselVAP
44Ascending aorta, AAATypeI2vesselVAP
53Ascending aorta, TAATypeIV4vesselVAP
64Ascending aorta, AAATypeI4vesselVAP
73TAATypeIV4vesselVAP
83TAATypeII4vesselVAP
94TAATypeI2vesselVAP
103TAATypeIII3vesselVAP
113TAATypeIV4vesselVAP
123TAATypeIII4vesselVAP
134TAATypeIV3vesselVAP
144TAATypeIII4vesselVAP
153TAATypeIIVesselselectivereimplant
163TAATypeIII3vesselVAP
173Ascending aortaTypeIV4vesselVAP
183Ascending aortaTypeI2vesselVAP
194Ascending aortaTypeI2vesselVAP
203AAATypeI4vesselVAP
214AAATypeII4vesselVAP
224AAATypeIVVesselselectivereimplant
233AAATypeI2vesselVAP
243AAATypeI2vesselVAP
253AAATypeIV4vesselVAP
264AAATypeII3vesselVAP
274AAATypeIIVesselselectivereimplant
283AAATypeI4vesselVAP
294AAATypeI2vesselVAP

TAAA, Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm; AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; VAP, visceral aortic patch.

For type I to III TAAA, distal aortic perfusion with left atriofemoral bypass and CSF drainage were used routinely. For type IV TAAA, hypothermic visceral perfusion was used routinely and CSF drainage was not performed.

Patients were evaluated with postprocedure contrast CT scans or magnetic resonance imaging at scheduled follow-up imaging at 3 and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Clinical follow-up was also conducted at regular intervals of 6 months.

We analyzed the outcomes in our patients, reporting the results and methods in accordance with the current reporting standards for endovascular aortic repair prepared and revised by the Ad Hoc Committee for Standardized Reporting Practices in Vascular Surgery (Society for Vascular Surgery/American Association for Vascular Surgery).18

Results 

return to Article Outline

Hybrid group 

Hybrid repair of TAAA was technically successful in all 13 patients. No intraoperative deaths occurred. No additional intraoperative cuff placement was required. The median procedure time was 239 minutes (range, 187 to 465 minutes). A median of 4.7 U packed red blood cells was transfused for a median blood loss of 480 mL (range, 380 to 2900 mL). All patients were admitted to the intensive care unit where they stayed for a median of 3 days (range, 1 to 12 days). The median hospital length of stay was 8 days (range, 7 to 35 days).

The hybrid repair was clinically successful in 10 (76.9%) of 13 patients. Three patients died postoperatively for a mortality rate of 23%: one on day 35 related to respiratory failure; one on day 3 from postoperative coagulopathy, and one on day 25 from pancreatitis.

Delayed onset paraplegia at 2 days postoperatively was observed in one (7.7%) patient with visceral aortic patch aneurysm, which resolved after CSF drainage. Other postoperative complications included acute renal failure in two patients (15.4%) that resolved without dialysis, and respiratory failure in one (7.7%).

At a median follow-up of 14.9 months (range, 11 days to 57.4 months), the mid-term clinical success rate was 76.9%. One patient died after 2 years of follow-up from causes unrelated to the aneurysm. We did not observe any aneurysm-related deaths, endoleak, stent graft migration, or visceral revascularization–related morbidity.

Conventionally treated group 

No intraoperative deaths occurred. The mean procedure time was 169 minutes. A mean of 8.7 U of packed red blood cells was transfused for a median blood loss of 1350 mL (range, 850 to 6500 mL). Perioperative mortality was 17.2% and morbidity was 44.8%. Perioperative complications included 3 patients with permanent paraplegia, 1 with coagulopathy, 2 with renal failure, and 7 with respiratory failure. All patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, where they stayed for a median of 2 days (range, 1 to 23 days).

At a median follow-up of 5.4 years (range, 1.7 to 7.9 years) no significant complications related to the aortic repair had been reported except for three (10.3%) patients with asymptomatic dilatation of visceral aortic patch <5 cm undergoing radiologic surveillance.

Preoperative comorbidities, risk factors, TAAA extent, age, and distribution of sites of prior aortic surgery were not statistically significantly different between the hybrid group and the conventionally treated group (χ2 and Student’s t test). Mortality and morbidity rates, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, median intensive care unit stay, and median duration of hospital stay were not notably different between the hybrid group and the conventionally treated group.

Discussion 

return to Article Outline

Since Crawford proposed his inclusion technique for the treatment of TAAA in 1978,6 the results of this operation have considerably improved owing to the use of adjunctive procedures, including distal aortic perfusion, selective visceral perfusion, and CSF drainage.19, 20, 21, 22 Nevertheless the morbidity and mortality associated with this major operation vary in the different series, depending mainly on the volume of activity of the treatment centers and the organ protection strategies that are used. The outcomes are usually poorer in particular subgroups, such as those with severe comorbid conditions and those who have undergone prior aortic repair, especially in cases of recurrent TAAA.23

Alternative treatment strategies, such as stent graft repair, are appealing for these high-risk patients. Although pure endovascular branch vessel technology has made it technically feasible to preserve visceral end-organ perfusion,4, 25, 26 the safety, effectiveness, and durability of these pioneering techniques are yet to be fully assessed.

By avoiding thoracotomy, a hybrid TAAA repair may be hypothesized to be particularly advantageous in the case of previous descending thoracic aortic repair in which a redo left-sided thoracotomy may be associated with major bleeding, increased rate of postoperative respiratory and organ failure, longer distal aortic perfusion time, longer total aortic clamping time, longer operation time, and reduced long-term survival.27, 28, 29, 30 Furthermore, in the case of frozen chest, a hybrid TAAA repair may be the only treatment alternative to large pulmonary iatrogenic injuries or simple observation.31

Hybrid repair may also have some advantages over conventional open TAAA repair in cases of previous ascending aortic or arch repair, in which pericardial or proximal aortic adhesions may increase the technical challenges and risk of major bleeding at the site of outflow cannulation if a left heart bypass from the left atrium, pulmonary vein or distal aortic arch is required.

It is interesting to hypothesize that existing thoracic or abdominal tube grafts in hybrid TAAA repairs may offer optimal in-graft landing zones for endografts and ideal inflow sites for visceral bypasses. In our series of 13 TAAA hybrid repairs, 14 endograft ends (53.8%) of 26 landed in pre-existing or novel tube grafts, and the absence of endoleak and endograft migration may also be the result of the high incidence of these kinds of ideal aortic neck.

The etiology of spinal cord ischemia during thoracic aortic procedures is multifactorial, and the risk of paraplegia is a debated concern. During hybrid TAAA repair, the avoidance of supraceliac clamping and the shortened duration of visceral ischemia should lead to greater perioperative hemodynamic stability compared with that during conventional open repair of TAAA, and the risk of spinal cord ischemia could be hypothesized to be reduced.26 This hypothetical advantage was likely balanced in our series by the increased risk of spinal cord ischemia related to the high incidence (12 of 13 patients) of prior descending, abdominal, or thoracoabdominal aortic graft repairs.25 Interestingly, however, we observed only one case (7.7%) of delayed transient paraplegia in the hybrid group compared with three cases (10.3%) of permanent paraplegia in the conventionally treated group.

The one-stage strategy had several advantages, one of which was related to the problem of the endograft access site. An iliac or aortic approach was required in 9 of 13 cases, and after the retrograde visceral reconstruction, the one-stage procedure made the iliac axis or infrarenal aorta promptly available for endograft insertion. The one-stage approach also gave us the option to place a wire around the aortic landing zone as a radiologic marker and also enabled direct visualization of the vascularization of abdominal organs during the deployment of the endograft.

The long-term results of hybrid repair are another matter of concern. The safety and durability of retrograde bypass grafting in hybrid repair still need to be assessed; however, based on patency recorded in retrograde visceral artery bypasses performed for mesenteric ischemia, the results seem to be encouraging.32 Given the necessary extra-anatomic routing of the visceral retrograde grafts, the risk of aortoenteric erosion or fistula and the fate of thoracoabdominal endografts will also need to be closely monitored.

The largest clinical series of hybrid TAAA repair published to date is that of Black et al,33 who reported an overall perioperative mortality rate of 13% and no cases of paraplegia by 30 days in their 29 patients. Based on a mortality rate of >30% in patients undergoing conventional open repair of TAAA, the authors encourage the use of hybrid TAAA repair in preference to conventional surgery.

Three perioperative deaths in our series resulted in a high (23%) early rate of mortality; however, only one of these deaths—from pancreatitis likely caused by the retropancreatic routing of the graft directed to the hepatic artery—was probably related to a specific complication of the hybrid technique of TAAA repair. The other two deaths, from respiratory failure and coagulopathy, were due to typical complications of major surgery. In these aspects, we did not note a protective effect from hybrid treatment being less invasive than conventional TAAA repair.

Finally, visceral aortic patch dilatation or aneurysm after TAAA conventional repair is not uncommon, may lead to aortic rupture,4, 5 and is particularly frequent in patients with connective tissue disorders, dissecting aneurysm, or prior thoracic or AAA repair.4, 5 All of the patients included in the present study had undergone prior aortic surgery, and the incidence of dilatation of visceral aortic patch in the conventionally treated group was high (3 cases, 10.3%). Successful hybrid TAAA treatment should eliminate this complication and could be considered an appealing alternative treatment for patients exhibiting a tendency to have multiple aneurysmal degeneration.

Regarding all of these topics, however, larger study cohorts are needed to make statistically meaningful comparisons and to eliminate temporal and learning curve–related biases owing to improved surgical and anesthesiologic experience in the hybrid group (period from 2001 to 2006) compared with in the conventionally treated group (including outcomes reported from 1988) in the present study.

Conclusions 

return to Article Outline

Morbidity and mortality of hybrid TAAA repair was not negligible, likely because of the high-risk patients we selected. We did not find that outcomes were significantly better after hybrid TAAA repair compared with open TAAA repair in similar groups of high-risk patients. Open TAAA repair remains our first choice of management, and we believe that hybrid TAAA repair remains indicated only in selected patients.

Hybrid treatment may be hypothesized to be particularly appealing in high-risk patients who have undergone prior aortic surgery, especially with recurrent TAAA, but large series are required for meaningful statistical comparisons and longer follow-ups are necessary to provide data on the durability of aortic stent-grafts and visceral artery reconstructions.1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

Author contributions 

return to Article Outline


Conception and design: RC, YT, GM

Analysis and interpretation: YT, LB, FC

Data collection: LB, FC, FS

Writing the article: YT, GM, RC, LB

Critical revision of the article: RC, GM, EM

Final approval of the article: RC, GM, YT, EM

Statistical analysis: YT, LB

Obtained funding: Not applicable

Overall responsibility: RC, YT, GM

References 

return to Article Outline

1. 1Miller CC, Porat EE, Estrera AL, Vinnerkvist AN, Huynh TT, Safi HJ. Number needed to treat: analyzing of the effectiveness of thoracoabdominal aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28:154–157. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (95 KB) | CrossRef

2. 2MacArthur RG, Carter SA, Coselli JS, LeMaire SA. Organ protection during thoracoabdominal aortic surgery: rationale for a multimodality approach. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;9:143–149. MEDLINE | CrossRef

3. 3Safi HJ, Miller CC, Huynh TT, Estrera AL, Porat EE, Winnerkvist AN, et al. Distal aortic perfusion and cerebrospinal fluid drainage for thoracoabdominal and descending thoracic aortic repair: ten years of organ protection. Ann Surg. 2003;238:372–380. MEDLINE

4. 4Dardik A, Perler BA, Roseborough GS, Williams GM. Aneurysmal expansion of the visceral patch after thoracoabdominal aortic replacement: an argument for limiting patch size?. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:405–409. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (154 KB) | CrossRef

5. 5Tshomba Y, Melissano G, Civilini E, Setacci F, Chiesa R. Fate of the visceral aortic patch after thoracoabdominal aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29:383–389. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (276 KB)

6. 6Crawford ES, Snyder DM, Cho GC, Roehm JO. Progress in treatment of thoracoabdominal and abdominal aortic aneurysms involving celiac, superior mesenteric, and renal arteries. Ann Surg. 1978;188:404–410. MEDLINE

7. 7Greenberg RK, West K, Pfaff K, Foster J, Skender D, Haulon S, et al. Beyond the aortic bifurcation: branched endovascular grafts for thoracoabdominal and aortoiliac aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:879–886. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (269 KB) | CrossRef

8. 8Chuter TA. Branched and fenestrated stent grafts for endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43(suppl A):111A–115A.

9. 9Kotsis T, Scharrer-Pamler R, Kapfer X, Liewald F, Gorich J, Sunder-Plassmann L, et al. Treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with a combined endovascular and surgical approach. Int Angiol. 2003;22:125–133. MEDLINE

10. 10Watanabe Y, Ishimaru S, Kawaguchi S, Shimazaki T, Yokoi Y, Ito M, et al. Successful endografting with simultaneous visceral artery bypass grafting for severely calcified thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:397–399. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (93 KB) | CrossRef

11. 11Lundbom J, Hatlinghus S, Odegard A, Eide TO, Lange C, Aasland J, et al. Combined open and endovascular treatment of complex aortic disease. Vascular. 2004;12:93–98. MEDLINE

12. 12Chiesa R, Melissano G, Civilini E, Setacci F, Tshomba Y, Anzuini A. Two-stage combined endovascular and surgical approach for recurrent thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:330–333. MEDLINE | CrossRef

13. 13Quinones-Baldrich WJ, Panetta TF, Vescera CL, Kashyap VS. Repair of type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm with a combined endovascular and surgical approach. J Vasc Surg. 1999;30:555–560. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (322 KB) | CrossRef

14. 14Macierewicz JA, Jameel MM, Whitaker SC, Ludman CN, Davidson IR, Hopkinson BR. Endovascular repair of perisplanchnic abdominal aortic aneurysm with visceral vessel transposition. J Endovasc Ther. 2000;7:410–414. MEDLINE | CrossRef

15. 15Black SA, Wolfe JH, Clark M, Hamady M, Cheshire NJ, Jenkins MP. Complex thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: Endovascular exclusion with visceral revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:1081–1089. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (204 KB) | CrossRef

16. 16Mitchell RS, Ishimaru S, Ehrlich MP, Iwase T, Lauterjung L, Shimono T, et al. First International Summit on Thoracic Aortic Endografting: roundtable on thoracic aortic dissection as an indication for endografting. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9:98–105. MEDLINE | CrossRef

17. 17Gawenda M, Aleksic M, Heckenkamp J, Reichert V, Gossman A, Brunkwall J. Hybrid-procedures for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms and dissections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33(1):71–77Jan. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (593 KB) | CrossRef

18. 18Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, White GH, Zarins CK, Bernhard VM, et al. Ad Hoc Committee for Standardized Reporting Practices in Vascular Surgery of The Society for Vascular Surgery/American Association for Vascular Surgery (Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair). J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1048–1060. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (102 KB) | CrossRef

19. 19Coselli JS. The use of left heart bypass in the repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: current techniques and results. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;15:326–332. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (252 KB)

20. 20Coselli JS, Conklin LD LeMaire SA. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: review and update of current strategies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:S1881–S1884. MEDLINE | CrossRef

21. 21Quinones-Baldrich WJ. Descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: 15-year results using a uniform approach. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004;18:335–342. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (792 KB) | CrossRef

22. 22Schepens M, Dossche K, Morshuis W, Heijmen R, Van Dongen E, Ter Beek H, et al. Introduction of adjuncts and their influence on changing results in 402 consecutive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:701–707. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (148 KB) | CrossRef

23. 23Back MR, Bandyk M, Bradner M, Cuthbertson D, Johnson BL, Shames ML, et al. Critical analysis of outcome determinants affecting repair of intact aneurysms involving the visceral aorta. Ann Vasc Surg. 2005;19:648–656. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (974 KB) | CrossRef

24. 24Coselli JS, Bozinovski J, LeMaire SA. Open surgical repair of 2286 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(2):Feb;S862-4; discussion S890-2.

25. 25Chiesa R, Melissano G, Civilini E, Setacci F, Tshomba Y, Anzuini A. Two-stage combined endovascular and surgical approach for recurrent thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:330–333. MEDLINE | CrossRef

26. 26Chiesa R, Melissano G, Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Civilini E, Setacci F. Spinal cord ischemia after elective stent-graft repair of the thoracic aorta. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:11–17. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (143 KB) | CrossRef

27. 27Nawa Y, Masuda Y, Imaizumi H, Susa Y, Kurimoto Y, Sawai T, et al. Comparison of surgical versus endovascular stent-graft repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in terms of postoperative organ failure. Masui. 2004;53:1253–1258. MEDLINE

28. 28Kawaharada N, Morishita K, Fukada J, Hachiro Y, Takahashi K, Abe T. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair through redo left-sided thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1304–1308. MEDLINE | CrossRef

29. 29Kawaharada N, Morishita K, Fukada J, Watanabe T, Abe T. Surgical treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm after repairs of descending thoracic or infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20:520–526. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (95 KB) | CrossRef

30. 30Menard MT, Nguyen LL, Chan RK, Conte MS, Fahy L, Chew DK, et al. Thoracovisceral segment aneurysm repair after previous infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:1163–1170. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (190 KB) | CrossRef

31. 31Baril DT, Carroccio A, Ellozy SH, Palchik E, Addis MD, Jacobs TS, et al. Endovascular thoracic aortic repair and previous or concomitant abdominal aortic repair: is the increased risk of spinal cord ischemia real?. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;20:188–194. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (1288 KB) | CrossRef

32. 32Kansal N, LoGerfo FW, Belfield AK, Pomposelli FB, Hamdan AD, Angle N, et al. A comparison of antegrade and retrograde mesenteric bypass. Ann Vasc Surg. 2002;16:591–596. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (539 KB) | CrossRef

33. 33Black SA, Wolfe JH, Clark M, Hamady M, Cheshire NJ, Jenkins MP. Complex thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: endovascular exclusion with visceral revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:1081–1089. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (204 KB) | CrossRef

Vascular Surgery, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Chair of Vascular Surgery, Scientific Institute H. San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.

 Competition of interest: none.

PII: S0741-5214(07)00226-1

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.10.057


View previous. 12 of 65 View next.