Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 45, Issue 5 , Pages 885-890 , May 2007

Five-year report of a multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms

  • Brian G. Peterson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Mo
  • ,
  • Jon S. Matsumura, MD

      Affiliations

    • Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Jon S. Matsumura, MD, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Suite 10-105, 251 E. Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611.
  • ,
  • David C. Brewster, MD

      Affiliations

    • Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
  • ,
  • Michel S. Makaroun, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa
  • ,
  • Excluder Bifurcated Endoprosthesis Investigators

Received 12 July 2006 ,Accepted 8 January 2007.

References 

  1. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:491–499
  2. Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SECA, Prinssen M, van der Ham AC, Buth J, van Sterkenburg SM, et al. Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) Trial Group Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2398–2405
  3. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trail 1): randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:2179–2186
  4. White GH, May J, McGahan T, Yu W, Waugh RC, Stephen MS, et al. Historic control comparison of outcome for matched groups of patients undergoing endoluminal versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23:201–212
  5. Brewster DC, Geller SC, Kaufman JA, Cambria RP, Gertler JP, LaMuraglia GM, et al. Initial experience with endovascular aneurysm repair: comparison of early results with outcome of conventional open repair. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:992–1003
  6. May J, White GH, Yu W, Ly CN, Waugh R, Stephen MS, et al. Concurrent comparison of endoluminal versus open repair in treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: analysis of 303 patients by life-table method. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:213–221
  7. Moore W, Kashyap V, Vescera C, Quinones-Baldrich W. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: a 6-year comparison of endovascular versus transabdominal repair. Ann Surg. 1999;230:298–306
  8. Zarins CK, White RA, Schwarten D, Kinney E, Diethrich EB, Hodgson KJ, et al. AneuRx stent graft vs open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: multicenter prospective clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29:292–308
  9. Matsumura JS, Katzen B, Hollier L, Dake M. Update on the bifurcated Excluder endoprosthesis: phase I results. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:S150–S153
  10. Matsumura JS, Brewster DC, Makaroun MS, Naftel DC. A multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:262–271
  11. Sacks D, Marinelli D, Martin L, Spies J. Reporting standards for clinical evaluation of new peripheral arterial revascularization devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;137–149
  12. Nelson WB. Recurrent events data analysis for product repairs, disease recurrences, and other applications (ASA-SIAM series on statistics and applied probability). Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM); 2002;ASA, Alexandria, VA
  13. Mennander A, Pimenoff G, Heikkinen M, Partio T, Zeitlin R, Salenius J. Nonoperative approach to endotension. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:194–198
  14. Fillinger M Excluder Bifurcated Endoprosthesis Clinical Investigators. Three-dimensional analysis of enlarging aneurysms after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the Gore Excluder Pivotal clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:888–895
  15. Kong LS, MacMillan D, Kasirajan K, Milner R, Dodson TF, Salam AA, et al. Secondary conversion of the Gore Excluder to operative abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:631–638
  16. Van Sambeek MRHM, Hendriks JM, Tseng L, van Dijk LC, van Urk H. Sac enlargement without endoleak: when and how to convert and technical considerations. Semin Vasc Surg. 2004;17:284–287
  17. Risberg B, Delle M, Lonn I, Syk I. Management of aneurysm sac hygroma. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:191–195
  18. Ryu RK, Palestrant S, Ryu J, Trachtenberg J. Sac hygroma after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: successful treatment with endograft relining. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;Jan 2; [Epub ahead of print]
  19. Thoo CHC, Bourke BM, May J. Symptomatic sac enlargement and rupture due to seroma after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with polytetrafluoroethylene graft: implications for endovascular repair and endotension. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:1089–1094
  20. May J, White GH, Yu W, Waugh R, Stephen M, Sieunarine K, et al. Conversion from endoluminal to open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a hazardous procedure. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;14:4–11
  21. Bernhard VM, Mitchell RS, Matsumura JS, Brewster DC, Decker M, Lamparello P, et al. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1155–1162
  22. May J, White GH, Stephen MS, Harris JP. Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm: concurrent comparison of outcome of those occurring after endovascular repair versus those occurring without previous treatment in an 11-year single-center experience. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:860–866
  23. Singh-Ranger R, McArthur T, Raphael M, Lees W, Adiseshiah M. What happens to abdominal aortic aneurysms after endovascular grafting? (A volumetric study using spiral CT angiography). J Intervent Radiol. 1998;13:145–146
  24. Gilling-Smith G, Brennan J, Harris PL, Bakran A, Gould D, McWilliams R. Endotension: definition, classification and implications for surveillance and intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Surg. 1999;6:305–307
  25. Meier GH, Parker FM, Dodziachvili V, Demasi RJ, Parent N, Gaele RG. Endotension after endovascular aneurysm repair: the Ancure experience. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:421–427
  26. Gawenda M, Jaschke G, Winter ST, Wassmer G, Brunkwall J. Endotension as a result of pressure transmission through the graft following endovascular aneurysm repair- an in vitro study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;26:501–505
  27. Lin PH, Bush RL, Katzman JB, Zemel G, Puente OA, Katzen BT, et al. Delayed aortic aneurysm enlargement due to endotension after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:840–842
  28. Cho JS, Dillavou ED, Rhee RY, Makaroun MS. Late abdominal aortic aneurysm enlargement after endovascular repair with the excluder device. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:1236–1241
  29. Trocciola SM, Dayal R, Chaer RA, Lin SC, DeRubertis B, Ryer EJ, et al. The development of endotension is associated with increased transmission of pressure and serous components in porous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene stent-grafts: characterization using a canine model. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:109–116
  30. Skillern CS, Stevens SL, Piercy KT, Donnell RL, Freeman MB, Goldman MH. Endotension in an experimental aneurysm model. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:814–817
  31. Haider S, Najjar SF, Cho JS, Rhee RY, Eskandari MK, Matsumura JS, et al. Sac behavior after aneurysm treatment with the Gore Excluder low-permeability aortic endoprosthesis: twelve month comparison to the original Excluder device. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:694–700

 Competition of interest: Dr Matsumura has been a paid consultant, clinical investigator, and/or received support from Abbott, Bard, Cook, Cordis, ev3, Medtronic, and WL Gore.

PII: S0741-5214(07)00060-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.01.044

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 45, Issue 5 , Pages 885-890 , May 2007