Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Page 466 , March 2007

Invited commentary

References 

  1. Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, White GH, Zarins CK, Bernhard VM, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1048–1060
  2. Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SE, Prinssen M, van der Ham AC, Buth J, van Sterkenburg SM, et al. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2398–2405
  3. Greenhalgh R, Brown L, Kwong G, Powell J, Thompson S EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:2179–2186
  4. Leurs LJ, Buth J, Harris PL, Blankensteijn JD. Impact of study design on outcome after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (A comparison between the randomized controlled DREAM-trial and the observational EUROSTAR-registry). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33:172–176
  5. van Marrewijk CJ, Leurs LJ, Vallabhaneni SR, Harris PL, Buth J, Laheij RJ. Risk-adjusted outcome analysis of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a large population: how do stent-grafts compare?. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12:417–429

PII: S0741-5214(06)02312-3

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.052

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Page 466 , March 2007

Article Tools