Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 451-460 , March 2007

Carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography–assisted endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in the azotemic patient

Presented at the Twenty-First Annual Meeting of the Western Vascular Society, La Jolla, Calif, Sept 16-19, 2006.

Received 18 September 2005 ,Accepted 3 November 2006.

References 

  1. Prinssen M, Verhoeeven ELG, Buth J, Cuypers PWM, van Sambeek MRHM, Balm R, et al A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. New Engl J Med. 2004;351:1607–1618
  2. Blankensteijn JD, deJohg SE, Prinssen M, van der Ham AC, Buth J, van Sterkenburg SM, et al. Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) Trial Group Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. New Engl J Med. 2005;352:2398–2405
  3. Greenberg RK, Chuter TAM, Lawrence-Brown M, Haulon S, Nolte L Zenith Investigators. Analysis of renal function after aneurysm repair with a device using suprarenal fixation (Zenith AAA endovascular graft) in contrast to open surgical repair. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:1219–1228
  4. Hawkins IF. Carbon dioxide digital subtraction arteriography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982;139:19–24
  5. Back MR, Caridi JG, Hawkins IF, Seeger JM. Nonoperative management of lower-extremity arterial disease, part ii (Angiography with carbon dioxide (CO2)). Surg Clin North Am. 1998;78:575–591
  6. Weaver FA, Pentecost MJ, Yellin AE. Carbon dioxide digital subtraction arteriography: a pilot study. Ann Vasc Surg. 1990;4:437–441
  7. Weaver FA, Pentecost MJ, Yellin AE. Clinical applications of carbon dioxide/digital subtraction arteriography. J Vasc Surg. 1991;13:266–273
  8. Frankhouse JH, Ryan MG, Papanicolaou G, Yellin AE, Weaver FA. Carbon dioxide/digital subtraction arteriography-assisted transluminal angioplasty. Ann Vasc Surg. 1995;9:448–452
  9. Schreier DZ, Weaver FA, Frankhouse J, Papanicolaou G, Shore E, Yellin AE, et al. A prospective study of carbon dioxide-digital subtraction vs standard contrast arteriography in the evaluation of the renal arteries. Arch Surg. 1996;131:503–508
  10. Chuter AM, Reilly LM, Faruqi RM, Kerlan RB, Sawhney R, Canto CJ, et al. Endovascular aneurysm repair in high-risk patients. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:122–133
  11. Wald R, Waikar SS, Liangos O, Pereira BJG, Chertow GM, Jaber BL. Acute renal failure after endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:460–466
  12. Mehta M, Veith FJ, Lipsitz EC, Ohki T, Russwurm G, Cayne NS, et al. Is elevated creatinine level a contraindication to endovascular aneurysm repair?. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:118–123
  13. Walker SR, Yusuf W, Wenham PW, Hopkinson BR. Renal complications following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Surg. 1998;5:318–322
  14. Sugawara Y, Sato O, Miyata T, Deguchi J, Kimura H, Namba T, et al. Surgical results of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with chronic renal dysfunction. Jpn Circ J. 1997;61:762–766
  15. Wijnen MHWA, Cuypers P, Buth J, Vader HL, Roumen RMH. Differences in renal response between endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001;21:171–174
  16. Brown MJ, Norwood MGA, Sayers RD. The management of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with concurrent renal impairment. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30:1–11
  17. Martin-Paredero V, Dixon SM, Baker JK, Takiff H, Gomes AS, Busuttil RW, et al. Risk of renal failure after Major angiography. Arch Surg. 1983;118:1417–1420
  18. Rieger J, Sitter T, Toepfer M. Gadolinium as an alternative contrast agent for diagnostic and interventional angiographic procedures in patients with impaired renal function. Nephr Dial Transplant. 2002;17:824–828
  19. Akgun H, Gonlusen G, Cartwright J, Suki WN, Truong LD. Are gadolinium-based contrast media nephrotoxic? (A renal biopsy study). Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130:1354–1357
  20. Briguori C, Colombo A, Airoldi F, Melzi G, Michev I, Carlino M, et al. Gadolinium-based contrast agents and nephrotoxicity in patients undergoing coronary artery procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;67:175–180
  21. Remy-Jardin M, Dequiedt P, Ertzbischoff O, Tillie-Leblond I, Bruzzi J, Duhamel A, et al. Safety and effectiveness of gadolinium-enhanced multi detector row spiral CT angiography of the chest: preliminary results in 37 patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast agents. Radiology. 2005;235:819–826
  22. Gahlen J, Hansmann J, Schumacher H, Seelos R, Richter GM, Allenberg JR. Carbon dioxide angiography for endovascular grafting in high-risk patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:646–649
  23. Kemerink GJ, De Haan MW, Vasbinder GBC, Frantzen MJ, Schultz FW, Zoetelief J, et al. The effect of equipment set upon patient radiation dose in conventional and CT angiography of the renal arteries. Brit J Rad. 2003;76:625–630
  24. Zorzetto M, Bernardi G, Morocutti G, Fontanelli A. Radiation exposure to patients and operators during diagnostic catheterization and coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998;40:348–351

 Competition of interest: none.

 CME article

PII: S0741-5214(06)02061-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.11.017

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 451-460 , March 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution