Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 44, Issue 6 , Pages 1363-1368 , December 2006

The evolving impact of microfabrication and nanotechnology on stent design

  • Jeffrey M. Caves, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga
  • ,
  • Elliot L. Chaikof, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga
    • Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga
    • School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Elliot L. Chaikof, MD, PhD, 101 Woodruff Circle, Room 5105, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322.

Received 21 July 2006 ,Accepted 6 August 2006.

  • Image Result

    Laser machining methods. A, After the direct-write method, a pulsed laser is scanned over the workpiece using mirrors. B, The masked-projection method is used to process larger regions of the workpiec

    Laser machining methods. A, After the direct-write method, a pulsed laser is scanned over the workpiece using mirrors. B, The masked-projection method is used to process larger regions of the workpiece with a wide, patterned beam.

  • Image Result
    Drug-containing reservoirs permit more advanced drug-release strategies.

    Drug-containing reservoirs permit more advanced drug-release strategies.

  • Image Result
    Left, A fabricated sample as cut from the metal foil with microelectrodischarge machining. Right, Angled and side views of an expanded stent.24 (Reprinted with the permission of Journal of Microelectr

    Left, A fabricated sample as cut from the metal foil with microelectrodischarge machining. Right, Angled and side views of an expanded stent.24 (Reprinted with the permission of Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems ©2004.)

  • Image Result
    Production of silicon micro-needles, as described by Henry.26 A silicon wafer is coated with chromium, and lithographic methods are used to pattern the chromium into dots, approximately the same diame

    Production of silicon micro-needles, as described by Henry.26 A silicon wafer is coated with chromium, and lithographic methods are used to pattern the chromium into dots, approximately the same diameter as the base of the desired micro-needles (steps 1-3). A reactive ion etching technique is used to erode the silicon. The chromium dot array protects regions of the silicon wafer, leaving a microneedle pattern (steps 4-5). Silicon microneedles arrays can subsequently serve as masters to form molds for the fabrication of metal and polymer micro-needles arrays.27

  • Image Result
    Hollow microneedles fabricated out of silicon, metal, and glass imaged by optical and scanning electron microscopy. A, Straight-walled metal microneedle from a 100-needle array fabricated by electrode

    Hollow microneedles fabricated out of silicon, metal, and glass imaged by optical and scanning electron microscopy. A, Straight-walled metal microneedle from a 100-needle array fabricated by electrodeposition onto a polymer mold (200 μm tall). B, Tip of a tapered, beveled, glass microneedle made by conventional micropipette puller (900 μm length shown). C, Tapered, metal microneedle (500 μm tall) from a 37-needle array made by electrodeposition onto a polymeric mold. D, Array of tapered metal micro-needles (500 μm height) shown next to the tip of a 26 gauge hypodermic needle. (Reprinted with permission of the National Academy of Sciences, USA ©2003.)27

 Kenneth Ouriel, MD, Review Section Editor

 Competition of interest: none.

PII: S0741-5214(06)01511-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.046

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 44, Issue 6 , Pages 1363-1368 , December 2006