Journal Home
Search for

Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 1156-1161.e30 (December 2006)


View previous. 8 of 70 View next.

Is emergency endovascular aneurysm repair associated with higher secondary intervention risk at mid-term follow-up?

Björn I. Oranen, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Wendy T.G.J. Bos, MDa, Eric L.G. Verhoeven, MD, PhDa, Ignace F.J. Tielliu, MDa, Clark J. Zeebregts, MD, PhDa, Ted R. Prins, MDb, Jan J.A.M. van den Dungen, MD, PhDa

Received 27 April 2006; accepted 26 July 2006. published online 27 October 2006.

Objective

The study assessed mid-term outcome of emergency endovascular repair for acute infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, with special attention to secondary interventions.

Methods

Between May 1998 and August 2005, 56 patients underwent emergent endovascular repair for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 34) or an acute nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 22). During the same period, 322 consecutive patients underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair and were used as control group. Five types of stent grafts were used: Vanguard, Talent, Excluder, Zenith, and Quantum. Follow-up included abdominal radiograph, duplex ultrasound scanning, and computed tomographic angiography. Outcome measures included all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality, complications, and secondary interventions.

Results

Mortality at 30 days was 18%, 5%, and 1% in the ruptured, acute nonruptured, and elective aneurysm groups, respectively. Overall mean follow-up was 38 ± 26 months. In the ruptured aneurysm group, survival was 67.8% ± 8.6% at 1 year and 62.1% ± 9.5% at 2 and 3 years. Seven secondary interventions (4 early and 3 late) were required in five patients (15%), with a cumulative risk of 9.2% ± 5.1% at 1 year and 16.2% ± 8.2% at 2 and 3 years. In the acute nonruptured aneurysm group, survival was 90.9% ± 6.1% at 1 year, 84.8% ± 8.2% at 2 years, and 76.4% ± 10.9% at 3 years. Four secondary interventions (1 early and 3 late) were required in four patients (18%), with a cumulative risk of 9.6% ± 6.5% at 1 and 2 years and 20.9% ± 12.0% at 3 years. In the elective aneurysm (control) group, survival was 95.2% ± 1.2% at 1 year, 89.9% ± 1.8% at 2 years, and 86.2% ± 2.1% at 3 years. A total of 51 secondary interventions (4 early, 47 late) were required in 38 patients (12%), with a cumulative risk of 4.2% ± 1.1% at 1 year, 7.6% ± 1.6% at 2 years, and 12.9% ± 2.2% at 3 years.

Conclusions

To our surprise, emergency endovascular aneurysm repair did not present with higher secondary intervention rate at mid-term follow-up.

Article Outline

Abstract

Patients and methods

Patients

Procedure

Follow-up

Definitions

Statistics

Results

Early complications

Late complications

Discussion

Author contributions

Appendix

Appendix I (online only). Kaplan-Meier data—overall survival

Appendix II (online only). Kaplan-Meier data—related survival

Appendix III (online only). Kaplan-Meier data—cumulative secondary intervention

References

Copyright

More than 10 years ago, the first case report about emergent endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR) was published by Yusuf, et al.1 Since then, the feasibility of this technique has been demonstrated by several cohort studies.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 These reports show 30-day mortality rates, albeit in preselected patients, of 9% to 45%.10 They do compare well with mortality rates of open repair for acute abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). A meta-analysis of open repair for ruptured AAAs (rAAAs) calculated a mortality rate of 48%.11 A review of open repair for acute nonruptured AAAs (nrAAAs) reported a mortality rate of 15.8%.12 However, there are no level I or II data that support the results of the eEVAR cohort studies. One randomized controlled trial comparing eEVAR with open repair for rAAAs is still recruiting patients.13

In view of the still poor results of open surgery, some authors do believe that eEVAR will likely become the gold standard for the treatment of suitable patients with rAAAs.14 Critics argue that patient selection plays an overly important role to be able to compare both techniques. They also mention the risk of complications and secondary interventions after elective EVAR.15, 16 With eEVAR, an even higher secondary intervention rate might be expected. This could be explained in several ways:


1.Acute AAAs represent end-stage disease and are therefore associated with more difficult anatomy. This may result in lower suitability and, because of angulation, in more difficult access and deployment of the graft. This additional technical challenge could lead to less-than-optimal positioning and subsequent results.

2.The emergent character of the whole procedure renders measurement and execution more tedious.

3.The presence of type II endoleaks in rAAAs could lead to prolonged bleeding with development of abdominal compartment syndrome, a factor that negatively affects survival.17

A recently published article by Hechelhammer, et al18 demonstrated an increased cumulative secondary intervention risk in eEVAR compared with a large elective EVAR series from the literature. This study assessed outcome of eEVAR for both rAAAs and acute nrAAAs in a tertiary referral center. It was anticipated that eEVAR would be associated with higher incidence of complications and, hence, of both early and late secondary interventions, compared with elective EVAR.

Patients and methods 

return to Article Outline

Patients 

Between May 1998 and August 2005, 56 patients underwent eEVAR for an acute infrarenal AAA, of whom 34 had a rAAA (61%) and 22 an acute nrAAA (39%). From the beginning of the study period on, patients presenting with an acute AAA were evaluated for eEVAR. Prerequisites for evaluation were the availability of an endovascular team and a sufficient stock of devices. From 2003 on, eEVAR was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Indeed, with increasing experience, an on-call team could be provided at all times, and from then on devices were always available.

Interpretation of hemodynamic stability in rAAA to allow evaluation for eEVAR was left to the discretion of the attending surgeon. Systolic blood pressures as low as 50 to 70 mm Hg were accepted in applying the “hypotensive hemostasis” principle.19 This means that fluid administration was restricted to avoid rise in blood pressure with the risk of subsequent bleeding.

Anatomic suitability for eEVAR was determined by computed tomographic angiography (CTA) according to guidelines for elective EVAR. These included a proximal neck length >15 mm with <60° angulation and access vessels large enough to accommodate the introducer sheaths.20 With time patients with more peculiar anatomy were also accepted, including those with severe angulations of neck and iliac arteries. This decision was reached between the attending vascular surgeon and interventional radiologist.

As a frame of reference for outcome, we defined a case-matched cohort of the 322 patients who underwent elective endovascular AAA repairs during the study period. During the same period, 211 patients underwent acute open repair, of whom 161 (76%) had a rAAA and 50 (24%) an acute nrAAA. Only 6% of patients presenting to our hospital with an acute AAA were not treated, mainly because of old age and comorbidity. Patient and aneurysm characteristics and type of anesthesia used are listed in Table I.21

Table I.

Patient and aneurysm related characteristics and type of anesthesia used

rAAAAcute nrAAAElective AAA
Age (year)73±973±971±8
Male/female (%)91/991/994/6
Aneurysm diameter (mm)74±1964±1159±10
Prox. neck length (mm)22±630±1628±11
Anesthesia (%)
Local808674
General201414
Spinal0012
ASA classification 21(%)
20924
3326872
468234
Comorbidity (%)
Coronary artery disease44.145.546.6
Congestive heart failure11.813.67.8
Arrhythmia17.613.613.4
COPD26.518.225.5
Diabetes mellitus11.89.19.3
Hypertension29.440.951.9
Chronic renal failure11.84.56.2

rAAA, Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm; nrAAA, nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiology; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Serum creatinine, >150 umol/L.

Procedure 

The first choice for anesthesia was local.7A bifurcated device was used whenever possible, which represents the most physiologic solution and is our daily practice in elective EVAR. Several types of stent grafts were inserted. In the beginning the choice was determined by market availability (Table II); now we have a full stock of both Zenith (Cook, Bloomington, Ind) and Excluder (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) stent grafts, which explains their use in acute cases in our hospital.

Table II.

Stent grafts inserted

TyperAAA n(%)Acute nrAAA n(%)Elective AAA n(%)
Vanguarda0(0)4(18)27(8)
Talentb2(6)1(5)51(16)
Excluderc3(9)0(0)61(19)
Zenithd9(85)17(77)170(53)
Quantume0(0)0(0)13(4)

rAAA, Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm; nrAAA, nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

The stent grafts inserted are listed in chronological order.

a

Boston Scientific Corp., Waterston, Mass.

b

World Medical/Medtronic Corp., Sunrise, Fla.

c

W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz.

d

Cook, Bloomington, Ind.

e

Cordis, Miami Lakes, Fla.

Follow-up 

Duplex ultrasound scanning (DUS) and plain radiographs of the abdomen in four directions were performed at discharge, 6 months, 1 year, and then yearly. CTA was performed ≤4 weeks after the procedure to confirm exclusion of the aneurysm. Thereafter CTA was only done if routine follow-up DUS or radiographs suggested any problem, including a type I or III endoleak, a type II endoleak with increase of the aneurysmal sac diameter, or in the event of migration, severe kinking, or structural damage of the stent graft. Indications for secondary intervention included type I and III endoleak or migration with imminent type I or III endoleak. Aneurysmal sac growth, with or without type II endoleak (endotension), was an indication for secondary intervention, but the indication was balanced with the patient’s age and comorbidity. Limb occlusion with disabling claudication or critical ischemia or severe kinking with imminent limb occlusion was also an indication for secondary intervention.

Definitions 

An acute AAA was defined as any AAA requiring treatment ≤24 hours. A differentiation was made between the rAAA and the acute nrAAA. The rAAA classification was only awarded in the presence of a retroperitoneal hematoma on CTA. All other acute AAAs were classified as acute nrAAAs as determined by acute onset of abdominal or back pain combined with pain at aneurysm palpation.

Aneurysm-related deaths were defined as all deaths due to aneurysm rupture after a primary or secondary intervention or open conversion.22 Early deaths (<30 days after the primary intervention or within the same hospital admission) were all classified as aneurysm related. Late deaths were only classified as unrelated if a nonrelated cause of death could be attributed.

In the context of this study, complications other than death of the patient refer only to those related to the aneurysm or stent graft.

A secondary intervention was defined as any subsequent endovascular or open surgical treatment related to aneurysm repair or complications thereof. An open conversion was defined as a laparotomy with removal of the stent graft and insertion of a surgical prosthesis. The term laparotomy implied nonconversion laparotomy only.

Statistics 

Data were prospectively collected in an Access database (Microsoft Corp, Redmond Wash) and analyzed using SPSS 12.0.1 (SPSS, Chicago, Ill) and GraphPad Prism 4 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, Calif). The outcome measures were all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality, complications, and secondary interventions. Variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Time-to-event variables were studied with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. If the standard error >10%, data were not presented in the figures. Comparison of time-to-event curves was conducted with Peto log-rank test. Values of P < .05 were considered statistically significant.

Results 

return to Article Outline

Early complications 

In the rAAA group, six (18%) of 34 patients died during the in-hospital period or ≤30 days. One patient died during the procedure. This 85-year-old patient presented with an AAA extending to both iliac bifurcations, but he died before complete exclusion. Five patients died in the postoperative period. One patient died the same day on the intensive care unit, probably due to a hypovolemic shock, although the completion angiogram showed exclusion of the AAA. Another patient died on day 4 due to cardiac failure. One patient, who underwent open conversion because of insufficient access, died of multiple organ failure on day 12. Another patient underwent a secondary intervention (laparotomy) on the day of the initial procedure for evacuation of a large retroperitoneal hematoma and died of respiratory insufficiency on day 14. The last patient who died had a complicated postoperative outcome with three reinterventions (laparotomies) for compartment syndrome, ischemic colitis, and sepsis. A severe pneumonia developed, and he died on day 20.

Three (other) intraoperative complications occurred. In one patient, a renal artery was inadvertently covered, which was accepted. In another, a contralateral limb was malpositioned. This patient also had a large retroperitoneal hematoma; therefore a laparotomy was performed to reposition the limb manually and to evacuate the hematoma. In the third, a local arterial access problem was solved with a patch plasty.

One (5%) of 22 patients in the acute nrAAA group died on day 6 because of respiratory insufficiency. Another patient underwent a secondary intervention because of a progressive groin hematoma after he had been treated with an aortouniiliac system with a femorofemoral crossover bypass.

In the elective AAA (control) group, the in-hospital or 30 day mortality was 3 (1%) of 322. One patient died due to bleeding from an intracerebral metastasis and two others due to myocardial infarction with ventricle fibrillation. Complications requiring secondary intervention are listed in Table III.

Table III.

Early and late secondary interventions

Secondary interventionsNPatients%
In ruptured AAA
Early secondary interventions426
Laparotomy (4)
Late secondary interventions339
Fenestrated aortic cuff (1)
Laparotomy + ligation of side branches (1)
Coil-embolization (1)
Patients without secondary interventions 2985
Total734100
In acute nonruptured AAA
Early secondary interventions114
Groin exploration (1)
Late secondary interventions3314
Wallstents + extensions (2)
Extension, custom made (1)
Patients without secondary interventions 1882
Total422100
In elective AAA
Early secondary interventions441
Thrombolysis + Wallstent iliac limb (1)
Aortic cuff (1)
Bypass from SMA to renal artery (1)
Embolectomy + Wallstent iliac limb (1)
Late secondary interventions473411
Embolectomy + Wallstent iliac limb (2)
Embolectomy + extensions (1)
Thrombolysis + Wallstent iliac limb (1)
Iliofemoral cross-over bypass (5)
PTA iliac limb (1)
PTA + Wallstent iliac limb (2)
Wallstent (1)
Coil-embolization (7)
Aortic cuff (4)
Fenestrated aortic cuff (2)
Wallstents + extensions (3)
Extension, custom made (6)
Laparotomy + ligation of side branches (3)
Laparotomy + suture aneurysm sac (1)
Bridging stent graft (1)
Conversion to open repair (7)
Patients without secondary interventions 28488
Total51322100

Late complications 

Mean follow-up in the rAAA group was 20 ± 21 months. During that period, five patients died after a mean of 11 months (range, 4 to 24 months). Two late deaths were due to cardiac events. One patient died as a result of acute leukemia and another related to an excess amount of different medications combined with severe anemia, for which treatment failed. The last late death occurred in an 86-year-old man with hypovolemic shock, most probably due to rupture of a concomitant 67-mm-diameter thoracic aortic aneurysm. Cumulative survival was 67.8% ± 8.6% at 1 year and 62.1% ± 9.5% at 2 and 3 years (Fig 1, A).


View full-size image.

Fig 1. A, Kaplan-Meier curves of patient survival expressed as all cause mortality. B, Kaplan-Meier curves of patient survival expressed as aneurysm-related mortality. rAAA, Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm; nrAAA, nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.


Three late complications required secondary intervention. (Table III). One patient developed a proximal type I endoleak after 4 years due to caudal migration of the graft (Talent) that was probably caused by extension of disease. This resulted in an overly short neck for standard EVAR, and he was therefore treated with a fenestrated cuff (Cook). Finally, two patients with secondary type II endoleaks resulting in aneurysm growth were treated. In the first, this was done by coil-embolization after 19 months, and in the second, by laparotomy with ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries after 3 months. Cumulative secondary intervention risk (early included) was 9.2% ± 5.1% at 1 year and 16.2% ± 8.2% at 2 and 3 years (Fig 2).


View full-size image.

Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier curves of secondary intervention risk. rAAA, Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm; nrAAA, nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.


In addition to the complications requiring treatment, three secondary type II endoleaks (1 with growth and 2 without growth) occurred. In all cases a watchful waiting policy was adopted with a 6-month follow-up interval. Finally, in one Excluder case, the aneurysm did grow without appearance of an endoleak on DUS and CTA. This was therefore classified as endotension, and that patient also is on a closer follow-up regimen at 6-month intervals.

Mean follow-up was 32 ± 25 months in the acute nrAAA group. During that period three patients died after a mean of 17 months (range, 6 to 31 months). Two late deaths were due to cardiac events, and the last death was due to cholangiocarcinoma. Cumulative survival was 90.9% ± 6.1% at 1 year, 84.8% ± 8.2% at 2 years, and 76.4% ± 10.9% at 3 years. (Fig. 1A).

Three late complications required secondary intervention (Table III). In these cases, a limb extension was applied to correct kinking and upward migration of the iliac limbs (2 Vanguards) or an overly short initial positioning in the common iliac artery (Talent). In both Vanguard cases, treatment consisted of insertion of Wallstents combined with Passager iliac extensions (Boston Scientific, Watertown, Mass), after 35 and 38 months, respectively. In the Talent case, a custom-made tapered iliac extension (Cook) was inserted after 6 months. Cumulative secondary intervention risk (early included) was 9.6% ± 6.5% at 1 and 2 years and 20.9% ± 12.0% at 3 years (Fig 2). There were two secondary type II endoleaks (1 each with and without growth), for which a watchful waiting policy was adopted, as described earlier.

In the elective AAA (control) group, mean follow-up was 40 ± 25 months. During that period, 53 patients died after a mean of 32 months (range, 2 to 84 months). Two deaths were classified as aneurysm-related (Fig 1, B) because the cause of death was unknown, whilst there was an endotension in one patient and a type II endoleak in the other. Cumulative survival was 95.2% ± 1.2% at 1 year, 89.9% ± 1.8% at 2 years, and 86.2% ± 2.1% at 3 years (Fig 1, A). Complications requiring secondary intervention are listed in Table III. Cumulative secondary intervention risk (early included) was 4.2% ± 1.1% at 1 year, 7.6% ± 1.6% at 2 years, and 12.9% ± 2.2% at 3 years (Fig 2).

The 30-day mortality for patients who underwent open repair for an acute infrarenal AAA was 32% in the rAAA group and 8% in the acute nrAAA group.

Discussion 

return to Article Outline

In this study comparing mid-term results of emergency EVAR in 56 patients (34 rAAA and 22 acute nrAAA) with elective EVAR in 322 patients, survival curves differed significantly for the rAAA and elective AAA patients. However, all cause mortality was similar between the three cohorts when the 30-day deaths were excluded. In addition, no late aneurysm related deaths occurred in the rAAA or the acute nrAAA groups.

Compared with elective EVAR, eEVAR in proven ruptures carries additional risks for early complications: in two patients early secondary interventions were needed due to a progressing retroperitoneal hematoma and complications thereof.

Only one other study, by Hechelhammer, et al,18 addressed mid-term outcome of eEVAR. In that report of 37 patients with an acute rAAA, overall survival was 89% at 1 year, 84% at 2 years, and 70% at 4 years. In contrast to their lower mortality compared with the result in this study, there was a higher secondary aneurysm-related procedure risk of 35% at 2 years and 44% at 3 years. These figures were explained by a high rate of early postoperative interventions. In their view, this could be a consequence of suboptimal fluoroscopy in the emergency operating room, or retroperitoneal hematoma. But also lack of the best-fitting stent graft available off the shelf and the fact that many of the interventions were performed outside office hours could have played a role.

They conclude that eEVAR is able to convert an acute life-threatening situation to a controlled situation that results in good survival at mid-term follow-up, and they accept subsequent procedures to prevent rupture. Some have even suggested that eEVAR for rAAA is a “bridge procedure” that will ultimately allow safer, elective open AAA repair and that it does not have to be a durable procedure. Our results indicate, however, that eEVAR may be a more durable procedure than expected. This is illustrated by the absence of a significant difference of cumulative secondary intervention risk for both the rAAA and the acute nrAAA groups compared with the control group. Furthermore, no late conversions occurred in either the rAAA or acute nrAAA groups.

Limitations are inherent to this type of study. First, prospectively gathered data did not include information regarding neck and iliac angulation for all patients, so the adverse anatomic conditions per study group could not be presented completely. Second, selection bias might have artificially improved results to a certain extent. Before 2003, without the availability of an endovascular team and a sufficient stock of devices at all times, patients were not always evaluated. This resulted in so-called black-out dates and a low inclusion. From 2003 on, with an endovascular intension-to-treat policy, 32% of all patients were treated by endovascular means, mostly determined by anatomic criteria only. Third, the stent grafts that were used for each group differed to a certain extent. Another issue is that only aneurysm-related or device-related complications were analyzed. Furthermore, the indications for secondary intervention in cases of aneurysmal sac growth due to type II endoleak or endotension varied depending age and comorbidity.

In conclusion, eEVAR appears to be not only lifesaving but also durable in the mid-term and should therefore be considered in all suitable patients with acute aneurysms.

Author contributions 

return to Article Outline


Conception and design: BO, EV

Analysis and interpretation: BO, EV, IT, CZ, TP, WB, JD

Data collection: BO, EV, WB

Writing the article: BO, EV

Critical revision of the article: BO, EV, IT, CZ, TP, WB, JD

Final approval of the article: BO, EV, IT, CZ, TP, WB, JD

Statistical analysis: BO, IT, WB

Obtained funding: Not applicable

Overall responsibility: BO

Appendix 

return to Article Outline

Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.

References 

return to Article Outline

1. 1Yusuf SW, Whitaker SC, Chuter TA, Wenham PW, Hopkinson BR. Emergency endovascular repair of leaking aortic aneurysm. Lancet. 1994;344:1645. CrossRef

2. 2Hinchliffe RJ, Yusuf SW, Macierewicz JA, MacSweeney ST, Wenham PW, Hopkinson BR. Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm—a challenge to open repair? (Results of a single centre experience in 20 patients). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001;22:528–534. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (161 KB) | CrossRef

3. 3Veith FJ, Ohki T. Endovascular approaches to ruptured infrarenal aorto-iliac aneurysms. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2002;43:369–378. MEDLINE

4. 4Lachat ML, Pfammatter T, Witzke HJ, Bettex D, Kunzli A, Wolfensberger U, et al. Endovascular repair with bifurcated stent-grafts under local anaesthesia to improve outcome of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;23:528–536. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (499 KB) | CrossRef

5. 5Yilmaz N, Peppelenbosch N, Cuypers PW, Tielbeek AV, Duijm LE, Buth J. Emergency treatment of symptomatic or ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: the role of endovascular repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9:449–457. MEDLINE | CrossRef

6. 6van Sambeek MR, van Dijk LC, Hendriks JM, van Grotel M, Kuiper JW, Pattynama PM, et al. Endovascular versus conventional open repair of acute abdominal aortic aneurysm: feasibility and preliminary results. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9:443–448. MEDLINE | CrossRef

7. 7Verhoeven EL, Prins TR, van den Dungen JJ, Tielliu IF, Hulsebos RG, van Schilfgaarde R. Endovascular repair of acute AAAs under local anesthesia with bifurcated endografts: a feasibility study. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9:729–735. MEDLINE | CrossRef

8. 8Scharrer-Pamler R, Kotsis T, Kapfer X, Gorich J, Sunder-Plassman L. Endovascular stent-graft repair of ruptured aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2003;10:447–452. MEDLINE | CrossRef

9. 9Reichart M, Geelkerken RH, Huisman AB, van Det RJ, de Smit P, Volker EP. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular repair is feasible in 40% of patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;26:479–486. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (128 KB) | CrossRef

10. 10Hinchliffe RJ, Braithwaite BD, Hopkinson BR. The endovascular management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;25:191–201. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (162 KB) | CrossRef

11. 11Bown MJ, Sutton AJ, Bell PR, Sayers RD. A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2002;89:714–730. MEDLINE | CrossRef

12. 12Leo E, Biancari F, Kechagias A, Ylonen K, Rainio P, Romsi P, et al. Outcome after emergency repair of symptomatic, unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: results in 42 patients and review of the literature. Scand Cardiovasc. 2005;39:91–95.

13. 13Balm R, Wisselink W, Vahl AC, Legemate DA, Rauwerda JA, Reekers JA, et al. Acute endovascular treatment to improve outcome of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms. A randomized trial. Available at: http://www.amc.nl/upload/teksten/NEW_PROTOCOL.pdf. Accessed: Apr 27, 2006.

14. 14Veith FJ, Ohki T, Lipsitz EC, Suggs WD, Cynamon J. Treatment of ruptured abdominal aneurysms with stent grafts: a new gold standard?. Semin Vasc Surg. 2003;16:171–175. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (186 KB) | CrossRef

15. 15Holzenbein TJ, Kretschmer G, Thurnher S, Schroder M, Aslim E, Lammer J, et al. Midterm durability of abdominal aortic aneurysm endograft repair: a word of caution. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:S46–S54. MEDLINE

16. 16Ohki T, Veith FJ, Shaw P, Lipsitz E, Suggs WD, Wain RA, et al. Increasing incidence of midterm and long-term complications after endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a note of caution based on a 9-year experience. Ann Surg. 2001;234:323–334. MEDLINE | CrossRef

17. 17Mehta M, Darling CR, Roddy SP, Fecteau S, Ozsvath KJ, Kreienberg PB, et al. Factors associated with abdominal compartment syndrome complicating endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:1047–1051. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (166 KB) | CrossRef

18. 18Heckelhammer L, Lachat ML, Wildermuth S, Bettex D, Mayer D, Pfammatter T. Midterm outcome of endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41:752–757. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (140 KB) | CrossRef

19. 19Crawford ES. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 1991;13:348–350. Full Text | Full-Text PDF (285 KB) | CrossRef

20. 20Kapma MR, Verhoeven EL, Tielliu IF, Zeebregts CJ, Prins TR, van der Heij B, et al. Endovascular treatment of acute abdominal aortic aneurysm with a bifurcated stentgraft. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29:510–515. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (155 KB) | CrossRef

21. 21Keats AS. The ASA classification of physical status - a recapitulation. Anesthesiology. 1978;49:233–236. MEDLINE

22. 22Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, White GH, Zarins CK, Bernhard VM, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1048–1060. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (102 KB) | CrossRef

a Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

b Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Björn I. Oranen, Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.

 Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.

Competition of interest: none.

PII: S0741-5214(06)01375-9

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.07.048


View previous. 8 of 70 View next.