Journal Home
Search for

Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages 1299-1300 (June 2006)


View previous. 47 of 64 View next.

Consensus statement on surgery journal authorship—2006

Article Outline

A.Authorship criteria

B.Order of authors

C.Multicenter studies

D.Contributors Listed in Acknowledgments

E.In conclusion

Copyright

In the majority of the clinical and research studies submitted to surgery journals for possible publication, many individuals participate in the conception, execution, and documentation of each of those works. However, recognition of work in the form of authorship has varied widely. This Consensus Statement is being issued to clarify and define the criteria for surgical journal authorship.

The following guidelines should be used to identify individuals whose work qualifies them as authors as distinct from those who are contributors to the work under consideration. All persons designated as authors should qualify for authorship, and all those who qualify should be so credited.

A.Authorship criteria 

return to Article Outline

Individuals claiming authorship should meet all of the following three conditions:

1.Authors make substantial contributions to conception and design, and/or acquisition of data, and/or analysis and interpretation of data;

2.Authors participate in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and

3.Authors give final approval of the version to be submitted and any revised version to be published.

Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content. Allowing one’s name to appear as an author without having contributed significantly to the study or adding the name of an individual who has not contributed or who has not agreed to the work in its current form is considered a breach of appropriate authorship.

Acquisition of funding, collection of data, contributing cases, or general supervision of the research group, of itself, or just being the Chair of the department does not justify authorship if the above criteria are not fulfilled.

B.Order of authors 

return to Article Outline

The order of authorship on the byline should be a joint decision of the coauthors. Authors should be prepared to explain the order in which authors are listed.

C.Multicenter studies 

return to Article Outline

When a large, multicenter group has conducted the work, the group should identify the individuals who accept direct responsibility for the manuscript. These individuals should fully meet the criteria for authorship defined above, and editors will ask these individuals to complete journal-specific author and conflict of interest disclosure forms. When submitting a group-author manuscript, the corresponding author should clearly indicate the preferred citation and should clearly identify all individual authors as well as the group name.

D.Contributors Listed in Acknowledgments 

return to Article Outline

All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section. Examples of those who might be acknowledged include individuals who allowed their clinical experience (ie, cases) to be included, a person who provided purely technical help, writing assistance, or a department Chair who provided only general support. Financial and material support should also be acknowledged.

Groups of persons who have contributed materially to the paper but whose contributions do not justify authorship may be listed under a heading such as “clinical investigators” or “participating investigators,” and their function or contribution should be described; for example, “served as scientific advisors,” “critically reviewed the study proposal,” “collected data,” or “provided and cared for study patients.”

Because readers may infer their endorsement of the data and conclusions, all persons listed as contributors must give written permission to be acknowledged.

E.In conclusion 

return to Article Outline

This consensus statement is intended as a basic guide for authors. In the interest of promoting the highest ethics in surgical publishing and the surgical sciences, we ask that authors take these criteria into careful consideration when submitting a manuscript to a peer-reviewed surgical journal.

This statement is being simultaneously published in the respective journals of the members of the Surgical Journal Editors Group, as follows:

American Journal of SurgeryKirby I. Bland, MD
The American SurgeonTalmadge A. Bowden Jr, MD
Annals of SurgeryLayton F. Rikkers, MD
Annals of Surgical OncologyCharles M. Balch. MD
Annals of Thoracic SurgeryL. Henry Edmunds, Jr, MD
Archives of SurgeryJulie Freischlag, MD
British Journal of SurgeryJohn Murie, MD
Canadian Journal of SurgeryGarth L. Warnock, MD, James P. Waddell, MD
Current SurgeryJohn A. Weigelt, MD
Digestive SurgeryMarkus Büchler, MD, John Neoptolemos, MD
Diseases of the Colon and RectumVictor Fazio, MD
Journal of the American College of SurgeonsTimothy J. Eberlein, MD
Journal of Burn Care and ResearchRichard Gamelli, MD
Journal of Gastrointestinal SurgeryJohn Cameron, MD, Keith Kelly, MD
Journal of the Japan Medical Surgical AssocYasuo Idezuki, MD
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical TechniquesMark Talamini, MD
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral NutritionCharles Van Way, III, MD
Journal of Pediatric SurgeryJay Grosfeld, MD
Pediatric Surgery InternationalArnold G. Coran, MD, Prem Puri, MD
Journal of Pelvic Medicine and SurgeryRobert D. Madoff, MD
Journal of Plastic & Reconstructive SurgeryRod J. Rohrich, MD
Journal of Surgical ResearchDavid McFadden, MD, Wiley W. Souba, MD
Journal of TraumaBasil A. Pruitt, Jr, MD
Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular SurgeryAndrew S. Wechsler, MD
Journal of Vascular SurgeryJack L. Cronenwett, MD, James M. Seeger, MD
SurgeryAndrew L. Warshaw, MD, Michael Sarr, MD
Surgical EndoscopyBruce V. MacFadyen, Jr, MD, Alfred Cuschieri, MD
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous TechniquesMaurice E. Arregui, MD, Carol Scott-Conner, MD
World Journal of SurgeryJohn G. Hunter, MD
Zentralblatt für ChirurgieHans Lippert, MD

 For more information: http://www.icmje.org/index.html

 This Consensus Statement was adapted from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals.

PII: S0741-5214(06)00547-7

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.029


View previous. 47 of 64 View next.