Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 16-26, January 2003

Mechanical failure of prosthetic human implants: A 10-year experience with aortic stent graft devices☆☆☆★

Presented at the Fiftieth Annual Meeting of the American Association for Vascular Surgery, Boston, Mass, Jun 9-12, 2002.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine. New York, NY

Received 18 June 2002; accepted 3 September 2002.

Article Outline

Abstract 

Objective: The first endovascular stent graft was implanted to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm more than a decade ago. This technique has evolved dramatically with the growing understanding of metallurgic and fabric sciences and improved device designs. However the potential for stent graft material failure remains. This investigation describes the incidence of material failure, potential modes of device fatigue, and the clinical significance of these failures. Methods: Six hundred eighty-six endovascular stent grafts were used to treat patients with aortic aneurysms. Device fatigue in the form of stent, suture fracture, or graft wear was identified with an analysis of follow-up radiographs and explanted stent grafts. A review of patient clinical histories, spiral computed tomographic scan studies, scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersion spectroscopy of explanted devices was conducted to evaluate the modes and consequences of failure. Results: Sixty patients were identified with device fatigue, 49 of whom had abdominal endovascular repairs and 11 of whom had thoracic repairs. Of the 60 patients with stent graft fatigue, 43 patients had metallic stent fractures, 14 had suture disruptions, and three had graft holes. These material failures occurred within seven distinct stent graft designs. The average time to the recognition of failure was 19 months, with a mean follow-up period of 8 months since the event was identified. Eleven patients died, and one was lost to follow-up 2 years after identification of a stent fracture. The remaining patients are presently being followed eoyj physical examination, plain film radiograph, and computed tomographic scans for clinical sequelae of device fatigue. Conclusion: Endovascular stent graft fatigue has been recognized in numerous devices after aortic implantation. Fatigue may take the form of stent, graft, or suture failure, with certain modes unique to specific stent graft devices. The clinical significance of stent graft material failure remains uncertain. (J Vasc Surg 2003;37:16-26).

 

The first endovascular stent graft repair to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm was performed by Parodi, Palmaz, and Barone1 more than a decade ago. An estimated greater than 25,000 aortic stent grafts have since been deployed worldwide, and although preliminary results have been promising, problems with deployment, stent graft migration, endoleak, material failure, and aneurysm rupture have all been reported.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Many of these problems were seen with first generation stent grafts. Fundamental mechanical and technical device problems have been addressed, and individual implants have been improved. However, as midterm results of second-generation endovascular grafts are reported, new problems are discovered.

Device fatigue remains one of the most concerning modes for potential procedure failure, encompassing the breakdown of the intrinsic mechanical parts of the stent graft. It is often difficult to identify device fatigue because patients are typically asymptomatic at the time of presentation. This difficulty has made a true understanding of the magnitude of the problem challenging. Moreover, the clinical significance of many identified material failures is unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze a large single experience of endovascular aortic repairs to identify the incidence of device fatigue and the potential modes of fatigue and to try and determine the clinical significance of these material failures.

Back to Article Outline

Methods 

Study population 

Six-hundred eighty-six patients underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair over a 10-year period, 39 of which were implanted by the senior author while attending at the Montefiore Medical Center and the remaining 647 performed at the Mount Sinai Medical Center. Four hundred four of these patients had a full compliment of follow-up analyses for review and form the study set for this investigation. A total of 60 patients (15%) of this subset had stent graft fatigue as identified with radiographic studies or the analysis of an explanted stent graft device. Patients were followed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter, in accordance with the specific US Food and Drug Administration protocols for each device, with physical examination, plain film radiographs, duplex ultrasonography, and spiral computed tomographic (CT) scans. The median follow-up period was 30 months, with a range from 1 to 52 months. The information obtained from these visits and the results of the radiologic studies were analyzed for evidence of device fatigue. Device fatigue was defined as an actual change in the mechanical nature of the device, such as suture disruption, metal fracture, or fabric erosion. Procedure failure was defined as a repressurization of the aneurysm sac or rupture of the aneurysm.

Techniques for endovascular repair 

The three techniques used for aortic aneurysm repair included: tubular (aortoaortic), aortouniiliac, bifurcated-modular, and bifurcated-unibody. All of these techniques have been demonstrated in detail previously.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

Devices for abdominal aortic aneurysm and thoracic aortic aneurysm repair 

Seven different devices were used to treat patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms, and two for thoracic aortic aneurysms. Extensive descriptions have been provided in the literature of the nine devices used: Talent,14, 15 Vanguard,14, 16 Parodi-Modified Endovascular stent graft,13 EVT,10, 17 AneuRx,18 Gore Excluder,19 Cordis Quantum LP,20 and the Talent and Gore thoracic devices.21

Stent graft analysis 

Radiographic studies 

Plain film radiographs and CT scans were performed at 1, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. CT scanning consisted of a noncontrast examination followed by a dynamic CT angiogram to evaluate for endoleaks or changes in aneurysm size. Plain films were used to analyze the stent components of the stent graft. Initially two views, anteroposterior and lateral, were used; however, over the past 2 years, right posterior oblique and left anterior oblique views have been added to improve visualization of the structural components of the device

Explant analysis 

Five grafts with device fatigue were available for explant analysis after open surgical conversion. The device was first inspected macroscopically for evidence of stent fracture, fabric tears, or suture breaks, and then representative regions of the metal stent were studied with scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Preparation of specimens for SEM 

Explanted stent grafts were rinsed of remaining debris and fixed in buffered formaldehyde. Each specimen was rinsed in distilled water and air dried for 24 hours. Representative regions of the metallic stent were ultrasonicated in a mild cleaning agent for 10 minutes, rinsed in distilled water, and ultrasonicated in absolute alcohol for another 10 minutes. The specimens were mounted on SEM stubs with silver paint. A Hitachi S530 SEM was used to evaluate the metal surface for defects and to analyze the site of fracture for evidence of fatigue. Energy dispersion spectroscopy (EDS) analysis was used at 15 kV on selected specimens to determine the surface composition of the metal and to assess for metal leaching.

Back to Article Outline

Results 

Sixty patients (49 men and 11 women) were identified with device fatigue, 55 on radiographic analysis and five on explantation. Forty-nine of the devices with fatigue were seen in abdominal aortic aneurysm stent grafts, and 11 were found in thoracic aortic stent grafts. The 60 fatigued stent grafts in this study were distributed among seven different devices (Table I).

Table I. Distribution of stent graft fatigue by device
Device for aortic aneurysm repairTotal implantedRadiographs reviewedTotal fatigue/fractureAverage time to fracture/fatigue (mo; range)Average follow-up since fracture/fatigue (mo; range)†
Abdominal
Vanguard2622 (85%)16 (72%)26* (3-48)13 (1-39)
Talent337232 (69%)24 (10%)13 (1-31)5 (1-12)
Modified Parodi16424 (15%)5 (21%)38 (33-48)6 (1-8)
EVT/Ancure9/207/61/0 (14%)824 and then lost to follow-up
AneuRx3933 (85%)3 (10%)10 (1-24)3 (1-6)
Gore1818 (100%)0
Teramed1010 (100%)0
Thoracic
Gore TAG2219 (86%)7 (37%)24 (3-38)12 (1-42)
Talent41‡33 (80%)4 (12%)9.5 (1-24)4 (2-7)
Total68640460198
*Excluding patient with acute conversion. †Excluding those patients who underwent open conversion and stent graft explanation. ‡Including emergent use not part of clinical study.
The average time to fatigue for all devices combined was 19 months (range, 1 to 48 months), with an average follow-up period since fatigue identification of 8 months. A marked variation in the time to failure was seen depending on the type of fatigue (ie, suture fracture, graft holes, or stent fractures; Table II). Eleven of the 60 patients followed with device fatigue have died, and one patient was lost to follow-up 2 years after fatigue was identified. Of the 11 deaths, three were device related, and the remaining eight patients died of causes unrelated to their aortic aneurysms. Excluding one early postoperative death, the average time to death was 29 months (range, 17 to 52 months) after implantation and 13 months (range, 2 to 26 months) after fatigue was first identified. The remaining patients continue to be followed for clinical sequelae of their stent graft fatigue.

Table II. Failure mode analysis by device
DeviceNo. fatiguedLocationNo.Average time to fatigue (mo; range)
AAA49
Talent24Graft hole116
Metal stent fracture2313 (1-31)
Longitudinal bar14
Aortic body: proximal7
Aortic body: distal1
Iliac6
Proximal transrenal stent5
Z-shaped body stent4
Vanguard16Suture disruption1425 (3-48)
Row separation5
Body separation9
Graft hole2Intraoperative & 36
EVT1Hooks and shanks18
Modified Parodi5Metal stent fracture538 (33-48)
Top row of stent4
Second row1
AneuRx3Metal stent fracture310 (1-24)
TAA11
Gore7Metal stent fracture724 (3-38)
Isolated longitudinal bar3
Longitudinal bar and z-stent2
Z-stent2
Talent4Metal stent fracture49.5 (1-24)
Z-stent3
Longitudinal bar1

AAA, Abdominal aortic aneurysm; TAA, thoracic aortic aneurysm.

Stent graft fatigue analyzed by device 

Abdominal aorta stent grafts 

Twenty-four of the 60 patients with device fatigue had Talent grafts inserted (Table II). Fatigue was recognized within several different regions of the stent graft. One patient had a wear hole detected in an explanted prosthesis at the site of graft to stent fixation (Fig 1, A).

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 1. 

    Clinical examples of fatigue in Talent endovascular system. A, After persistent type I endoleak, 70-year-old man had endovascular graft explanted and conventional repair completed. Explanted graft showed signs of graft wear with frayed fabric yarns and creation of defined hole (arrow). B, Proximal longitudinal bar fracture in Talent endovascular graft (arrow). C, Distal aortic longitudinal bar fracture (arrow). D, Ipsilateral limb longitudinal bar fracture in Talent endovascular graft. E, Midbody z stent fracture (arrow). F, Proximal transrenal stent fracture in Talent endovascular graft. Note fracture has occurred adjacent to site of nitinol wire crimp, which contains two ends of z-configured stent.

The remaining Talent endografts had fractured stents. Fourteen fractures occurred along the longitudinal bar of the graft (Fig 1, B to D), and nine in the serpentine shaped nitinol (Fig 1, E, F).

Device fatigue was identified in 16 Vanguard abdominal aortic aneurysm stent grafts; 14 had evidence of suture disruption, and two had fabric wear holes (Fig 2, A to D).

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 2. 

    Clinical examples of fatigue in Boston Scientific Vanguard endovascular graft. Sixty-nine-year-old man had tube graft inserted for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. A, Proximal row separation was defined on this graft along with distal endoleak caused by retraction of prosthesis. B, Graft was explanted, and conventional repair was done at 36 months. Arrow points to site of proximal row separation. C, High-powered magnification of graft depicted in Fig 9, B, shows fabric fatigue and wear holes on prosthesis surface. D, Seventy-nine-year-old man had endovascular tube graft placed for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. On surveillance abdominal radiographs, suture fractures in body of graft are detected (arrow). This patient remains in surveillance program.

The remaining nine fatigues were metal fractures: one EVT device (Fig 3), five modified Parodi endovascular stent grafts (Fig 4), and three AneuRx devices (Fig 5).
  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 5. 

    Abdominal radiograph of patient who underwent AneuRx endografting of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arrow denotes site of fracture in one of nitinol rings on stent strut.

Metal fatigue within AneuRx grafts was difficult to conclusively identify on plain film examination because of overlapping metal densities of the stent and the relatively close diamond pattern.

Thoracic aorta stent grafts 

Eleven of the 60 cases with device fatigue were metal fractures in thoracic aortic stent graft devices: seven Gore TAG and four Talent. Although the seven TAG devices had fractures in either the longitudinal bar, the z-shaped stent, or both (Fig 6), the four Talent thoracic aortic aneurysm devices had fractures in the z-shaped stents only.

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 6. 

    High-resolution explant radiograph of Gore TAG stent graft that was used to repair thoracic aortic aneurysm. This patient was seen 32 months after endovascular repair of thoracic aneurysm with new endoleak. Endoprosthesis was explanted, and conventional reconstruction was successfully accomplished. Explanted examination of stent graft with plain film radiograph shows z-configured wire fractures (arrowheads) and longitudinal bar fracture (arrow).

Endoleaks 

Endoleaks were identified in 24 of the 60 patients (40%) with device fatigue at some point during the follow-up period (Table III). Five (21%) had evidence of fatigue before the endoleak. One patient had proximal and distal metallic fractures in a first generation EVT stent graft, and the second patient had a row separation caused by suture fracture of a Vanguard device that later developed a type I endoleak from dislodgment of the distal left limb. The third patient also had a row separation of a Vanguard tube device and 7 months later was noted to have a type I endoleak from the proximal and the distal attachment sites. The fourth patient was noted to have a body separation of a bifurcated Vanguard device that went on to develop a type III endoleak from a separation of the modular iliac limb. The final patient was noted to have a type II endoleak 18 months after a fracture of the third row of the metallic stents in the AneuRx device was identified.

Table III. Incidence of endoleaks in grafts with device fatigue
Time of diagnosis in relation to fatigue
DeviceEndoleak #BeforeAfterSame timeManagement
AAA20
Vanguard92345-Endovascular repair
2-Open repair
2-Observation
Talent75 21-Embolization of type II endoleak
3-Open repair
2-Resolved spontaneously
1-Observation
EVT1 1 1-MEGS A-I-F
Modified Parodi11 1-Endovascular repair
AneuRx1 1 1-Observation
TAA4
Gore2 21-Open repair
1-Observation
Talent2 21-Endovascular repair
1-Refused surgery, died of rupture

AAA, Abdominal aortic aneurysm; TAA, thoracic aortic aneurysm; MEGS A-I-F, Mount Sinai endovascular stent graft aorto-iliac-femoral.

Eight patients (33%) had stent graft fatigue develop after the endoleak was diagnosed, and 11 fatigued grafts (46%) were identified at the same time as an endoleak. Sixteen patients needed treatment for their endoleaks, two had spontaneous resolution, and six are currently being monitored (Table III).

Explants 

Five of the six patients who underwent open conversion had the stent grafts explanted. One patient underwent conversion at the time of the primary stent graft procedure for an inadvertent iliac artery rupture with insertion of a second device to seal a type III endoleak. The remaining four patients had a new endoleak and an enlarging aortic aneurysm. The average time to explantation was 28 months (range, 15 to 36 months).

SEM and EDS analysis 

SEM analysis was conducted on all five explanted prostheses. Special attention was given to regions of the stent graft where corrosion would be expected to form (ie, crimped area of the ends of the nitinol wire stent in the Talent device, the platinum-nitinol interface of the Vanguard stent graft, and the high stressed angled regions of zig-zag nitinol stents; Fig 7, A to C).

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 7. 

    SEM of explanted endovascular grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysm. A, Vanguard endovascular graft has platinum wire wound around proximal and distal portions of attachment system to improve radiograph visualization (40×). B, Despite suspected increased potential for metal fatigue and corrosion at interface of these two metals, no such fatigue was found in nitinol in this 36-month-old implant (200×). C, SEM of Talent stent explanted 15 months after insertion. Site depicts crimped region of two ends of metal bar. No significant wear or pitting was detected on surface of nitinol stent at this presumably high risk area for fatigue (40×). D, High-powered (4K) magnification of surface of Talent nitinol spring after explantation. Rough-appearing, uniform oxide layer is discerned.

There was minimal evidence of corrosion on all the specimens examined. The stent wire was covered with a relatively uniform oxide surface layer (Fig 7, D) except for an occasional pit. These pits were analyzed with EDS, and an apparent decrease in the nickel concentration on the metal surface was noted. The expected balanced ratio of titanium to nickel (51%:49%) was commonly seen in the area immediately subjacent to the regions with defects (Fig 8, A, B) One explanted TAG device with a metal fracture was analyzed; the fracture surface showed cleavage lines within the radius of the stent typical of stress fatigue (Fig 9).
  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 8. 

    EDS of explanted Talent graft. A, Marked decrease in nickel peak is discerned in area containing defect in relatively uniform oxide layer. B, In subjacent region to that irregular area described in A, normal titanium to nickel distribution is identified.

Back to Article Outline

Discussion 

Since the first endovascular stent graft was introduced by Parodi, Palmaz, and Barone1 over a decade ago, advancements in stent graft materials, designs, and deployment techniques have all contributed to the rapid growth and utility of these devices. Despite enhanced understanding of the metallurgic and fabric properties of endovascular stent grafts, material failure continues to be a potential problem. The inherent properties of the materials (strength and corrosion resistance) combined with extrinsic forces contribute significantly to the risk of device fatigue. Before deployment, and while still in the delivery sheath, the metallic stent may experience increased risk for failure based on damage during loading and subsequent confinement in the delivery catheter. Once implanted, the device is then subjected to additional extrinsic forces imposed by the geometry of the tortuous aorta and the impact of continuous, high-pressure blood flow. In this study of 60 patients with stent graft fatigue, 43 of the patients had metallic stent fractures, 14 had suture-stent disruptions, and three had graft holes. It is useful to analyze these three failure modes before speculating on the overall clinical significance of stent graft fatigue.

Metallic fracture 

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 9. 

    Free surface of a fractured nitinol wire from Gore TAG supporting stent explanted 32 months after thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. Note cleavage planes and irregular surface at step-off point of this fatigue fracture (200×).

The 43 metallic stent fractures analyzed in this study occurred in devices fabricated by five different manufacturers. Thirty-seven fractures were documented in superelastic nitinol (nickel and titanium) stents, five fractures in stainless steel (316L) devices, and one in an elgiloy (cobalt-chromium, nickel) stent.

Elgiloy fractures were initially reported in the hooks of first generation EVT devices during the early phase of the EVT trial.17 Even though the hooks were remodeled to a more gradual angle to decrease the stress applied across the hook, Najibi et al22 reported two cases of hook fractures identified 36 months after implantation of the remodeled Ancure device. Although the EVT device in this study had similar fractures to the ones reported in the literature, there was no evidence of fractures in the remodeled Ancure system. However, the mean follow-up for patients with Ancure devices in this study was only 13 months.

Stress fatigue is just one of the causes postulated for metal fractures in these devices. Metal corrosion has been identified on SEM studies of explanted Stentor grafts, with more severe corrosive irregularities detected in those devices implanted for longer period of time.23, 24 However, SEM failed to show significant signs of corrosion in the nitinol stents of this study and, in fact, revealed a relatively uniform oxide layer on the surface of the metal stents, which may provide resistance to corrosion. The lack of corrosion in this study compared with the results of the earlier Stentor models may reflect the improved understanding of nitinol processing and the importance of surface treatments, such as electropolishing,25 titanium nitride annealing,26 heat treatments, and nitric acid passivation27 to create a thin, uniform oxide layer to help prevent corrosion and increase biocompatibility and long-term durability of the metal.28

Overall structural integrity of these devices can be affected by morphologic characteristics of the recipient vessel, changes in the aneurysm shape over time, or cyclic loading from aortic pulsations.29, 30 Kinking of the graft can occur from these stresses and has been associated with limb occlusion and device or modular component migration in the Stentor/Vanguard model29 and with metal stent fracture of the longitudinal bars in the Talent device.30 In this report, 18 fractures occurred in the longitudinal nitinol bars of Talent or Gore stent grafts. These events were associated with tortuosity of the implant vessels with presumed increased stress across the nitinol wire.

The remaining metal stent fractures occurred in Palmaz stainless steel stents (n = 5) and high stressed angled regions of nitinol z-shaped stents (n = 19). The cyclic load from the aortic pulsations can generate enough stress to cause microcracks, material irregularities on the surface of metals produced during laser cutting, to propagate and eventually fracture. Unfortunately, limited in vivo information exists on fatigue crack propagation for endovascular stents. Studies to date have focused on orthopedic or heart valve implants, which are larger devices and have different loading patterns.31 Although the metals used today have high crack propagation thresholds, the strut widths are thin, approximating 250 μm, thereby leaving a small distance necessary for a microcrack to travel before fracture.32

Fabric fatigue 

All five explanted stent grafts had evidence of fabric fatigue. Although degradation of conventional polyester grafts has been reported, it usually occurs 10 to 20 years after implantation.33 The fabric wear seen in endovascular stent grafts occurs much earlier. The pulsatile flow of the aorta and the configuration of the stent graft allows for micromotion of the individual metal stents against the fabric leading to eventual breakdown and graft wear. Fabric fatigue was one of the first reported causes of aneurysm rupture and stent graft failure in the earlier Stentor graft.2 External abrasions of the fabric on the metal stent and frank graft holes have been described.24, 33, 34

In the Stentor and Vanguard devices, the stent is attached to the graft at the proximal and distal ends only allowing for continuous motion between the stent and the graft. Fewer examples of graft fenestrations have been reported with the Talent design, whose stent is completely fixed to the graft with sutures, thereby reducing the movement between the graft and the nitinol stent. In the one patient whose device was explanted immediately on open conversion and in which fabric fatigue was seen, micromotion of the Vanguard device is unlikely to have caused the failure. Fatigue had to have occurred during manufacturing or packaging of the device into the deployment catheter. Theoretically, if the stent graft is drawn into the catheter from the opposite direction from which it will be deployed, the angled points of the stents can press firmly against the graft fabric, potentially causing a small tear or hole.

Suture breakage 

Polypropylene sutures that are used to assemble the Stentor/Vanguard device may also be subject to fatigue. Micromotion of the individual nitinol stents causes friction and wear of the sutures, with ultimate suture fracture and stent row separation. As of January 2001, there has been a 21% prevalence rate of row separation reported in the Vanguard model.35 Of the 14 suture disruptions that were identified in this report, five were row separations and nine occurred in the body; this finding is in support of Riepe's hypothesis that there is more motion in the larger frames of the body stents.3

Besides the intrinsic properties of the materials used for stent graft fabrication and the extrinsic hostile environment of the native aorta, other factors could play a role in device fatigue. Twenty-four of the 60 patients (40%) in this report were diagnosed with endoleaks during the follow-up period. The precise time of device failure and endoleak formation is often impossible to determine; however, only five patients were found to have metallic fractures before the onset of the endoleak. The remaining 19 patients had an endoleak develop followed by metallic fracture or had both events simultaneously discovered. Endoleaks have been shown to maintain pressure and turbulent flow in the aneurysm sac, leading to eventual enlargement of the aneurysm and risk for rupture.6, 37 The residual aneurysm sac pressure may be communicated to the stent graft itself in the form of increased device pulsatility that can lead to metallic fracture, suture disruption, and fabric wear, resulting in stent graft device fatigue.

Although most authors agree in the significance of a type I or type III endoleak contributing to aneurysm dilatation and risk of eventual rupture, the role a type II endoleak has is less clear.38, 39, 40 In this study, there were seven type II endoleaks, six of which were diagnosed before the stent graft fracture. All six of these endoleaks were observed on average 20 months (range, 6 to 32 months) before diagnosis of the stent graft fracture. One can hypothesize that although a type II endoleak may not generate enough pressure to cause aneurysm dilatation and rupture, that there is enough pulsatile flow to expose the stent graft to excess micromotion, which in turn could lead to device fatigue.

Clinical significance 

Although fractures were found in 60 patients with endovascular stent grafts, most of the patients has been asymptomatic and have not as of yet needed interventions for device fatigue. Although three patients had symptomatic aneurysms develop in the setting of stent fractures, it is unclear whether these events were related to the fatigued stents. One patient with an immediate type III leak (graft hole) after implantation died after open conversion as a consequence of that leak. This adverse event is assumed to be device related. Concern regarding fractured stent erosion through the fabric of stent grafts remains; however, this event has not been clearly identified in this study. At this time, we recommend that if a patient is asymptomatic and there is no evidence of aneurysm enlargement, rupture, or a type I or III endoleak, observation of the stent graft fatigue is acceptable in the setting of increased graft surveillance.

Back to Article Outline

Conclusion 

Endovascular grafts have been clinically used to treat aortic aneurysms for more than 10 years. A significant growth in the understanding of the failure modes of the materials used to fabricate these devices and a respect for the relatively harsh environment into which they must function has led to the development of improved stent graft designs. Endovascular graft devices may experience metal fracture, fabric erosion, and ultimate device fatigue as a result of these two components. Stent graft packaging into delivery catheters, sterilization, and shelf aging may all further impact the occurrence and timing of device integrity failure. Improved manufacturing practices can decrease the frequency of these fatigue events; however, clinical implications of many forms of device fatigue remains to be defined.

Back to Article Outline

Acknowledgements 

We thank Mr Norman Katz for technical assistance with the scanning electron microscopy portion of this investigation and Mr Joseph Samet for help with the photographic preparation of this manuscript.

Back to Article Outline

Discussion 

Dr Piergiorgo Cao (Perugia, Italy). Material fatigue is a central issue in stent graft durability. I have a few questions.

Did you hypothesize that the degradation of the material was dependent more from the lenghth of the follow-up done than from the structural characteristic of the endografts? So, was it more time dependent than structural dependent?

Did you correlate any difference between internal and external stenting of the graft? The external nitinol can be separated from the bloodstream and therefore protected from degradation.

Another important issue is the connection between the fabric and the stent. I found in your abstract that the Excluder graft, in which the stent is not sutured but embedded inside the PTFE, was more degradative and presented more mechanical failure. I wonder if you have any explanation for that.

Dr Tikva S. Jacobs. In our study, we only had three explanted devices that had evidence of fabric erosion, so it is a little difficult to draw any conclusions from that. But of those three grafts that had the fabric erosion, they were both in nitinol and Dacron materials and both of them were in devices that had a nitinol endoskeleton.

Dr Richard P. Cambria (Boston, Mass). Dr Jacobs, it was a wonderfully illustrated presentation, obviously with a long experience.

My question may be somewhat repetitive to Dr Cao's, but it was a little difficult to follow in terms of the different types of grafts. Do your findings have implications for either graft material, polyester versus PTFE? And with particular reference to your homemade system, we saw the overall data there, but how about the comparisons between polyester and PTFE?

And to reiterate the question, in your summary data, does this have design implications for whether or not an exoskeleton or an endoskeleton is preferred?

Dr Jacobs. To answer your first question about Dacron versus PTFE, again, we only had five explanted devices to really analyze the material, and only three of them had evidence of fabric erosion. All three were in Dacron devices. We did not find any evidence of fabric erosion in the PTFE.

In reference to the design with endoskeletons versus exoskeletons, the majority of our device fatigue was actually in metal stent fracture. Seventy-two percent of our device fatigues were metal stent fractures. And it did not really matter whether it was an endoskeleton or an exoskeleton. What we noticed is that the majority of them were either in the longitudinal bars of the metal stents or at the point, the apex, of the z-shaped stents. And it is most likely the metal stent fracture that is secondary to cyclic loading and stress.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:491–499
  2. Beebe HG, Cronenwett JL, Katzen BT, Brewster DC, Green RM. Results of an aortic endograft trial: impact of device failure beyond 12 months. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:S55–S63
  3. Riepe G, Heilberger P, Umschield T, Chakfe N, Raithel D, Stelter W, et al.  Frame dislocation of body middle rigs in endovascular stent tube grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999;17:28–34
  4. Bohm T, Soldner J, Rott A, Kaiser WA. Perigraft leak of an aortic stent graft due to material fatigue. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:1355–1357
  5. Norgren L, Jernby B, Engellau L. Aortoenteric fistula caused by a ruptured stent-graft: a case report. J Endovasc Surg. 1998;5:269–272
  6. Maleux G, Rousseau H, Otal P, Colombier D, Glock Y, Joffre F. Modular component separation and reperfusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac after endovascular repair of the abdominal aortic aneurysm: a case report. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28:349–352
  7. Holzenbein TJ, Kretschmer G, Thrunher S, Schoder M, Aslim E, Lammer J, et al.  Midterm durability of abdominal aortic aneurysm endograft repair: a word of caution. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:S46–S54
  8. Parodi JC, Marin ML, Veith FJ. Transfemoral, endovascular stented graft repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arch Surg. 1995;130:549–552
  9. Marin ML, Hollier LH, Avrahami R, Parsons R. Varying strategies for endovascular repair of abdominal and iliac artery aneurysms. Surg Clin North Am. 1998;78:631–645
  10. Moore WS. The EVT tube and bifurcated endograft systems: technical considerations and clinical summary. J Endovasc Surg. 1997;4:182–194
  11. Dake MD, Miller C, Semba CP, Mitchell S, Walker PJ, Liddell RP. Transluminal placement of endovascular stent-grafts for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1729–1734
  12. Chuter TA, Green RM, Ouriel K, Fiore WM, Deweese JA. Transfemoral aortic graft placement. J Vasc Surg. 1993;18:185–197
  13. Faries PL. Endovascular grafts for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. In:  Marin ML,  Hollier LH editor. Endovascular grafting: advanced treatment for vascular disease. Armonk (NY):: Futura Publishing Co, Inc; 2000;p. 73–94
  14. May J, White GH, Harris JP. Devices for aortic aneurysm repair. Surg Clin North Am. 1999;79:507–527
  15. Criado FJ, Wilson EP, Fairman RM, Abdul-Khoudoud O, Wellons E. Update on the Talent aortic stent-graft: a preliminary report from United States phase I and II trials. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:S146–S149
  16. Mialhe C, Amicabile C, Becquemin JP. Endovascular treatment of infrarenal abdominal aneurysms by the Stentor system: preliminary results of 79 cases. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:199–209
  17. Moore WS, Rutherford RB. Transfemoral endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: results of the North American EVT phase 1 trial. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23:543–553
  18. Zarins CK, White RA, Moll FL, Crabtree T, Bloch DA, Hodgdon KJ, et al.  The AneuRx stent graft: four-year results and worldwide experience 2000. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:S135–S145
  19. Bush RL, Najibi S, Lin PH, Weiss VJ, MacDonald MJ, Redd DC, et al.  Early experience with the bifurcated Excluder endoprosthesis for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:497–502
  20. Brener BJ, Faries P, Connelly T, Sefranek V, Hertz S, Kirksey L, et al.  An in situ adjustable endovascular graft for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:114–119
  21. Mitchell RS, Dake MD, Semba CP, Fogarty TJ, Zarins CK, Liddell RP, et al.  Endovascular stent graft repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;11:1054–1062
  22. Najibi S, Steinberg J, Katzen BT, Zemel G, Lin PH, Weiss VJ, et al.  Detection of isolated hook fractures 36 months after implantation of the Ancure endograft: a cautionary note. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:353–356
  23. Heintz C, Riepe G, Birken L, Kaiser E, Chakfe N, Morlock M, et al.  Corroded nitinol wires in explanted aortic endografts: an important mechanism of failure?. J Endovasc Ther. 2001;8:248–253
  24. Guidoin R, Marios Y, Douville Y, King MW, Castonguay M, Traore A, et al.  First generation aortic endografts: analysis of explanted Stentor devices from the EUROSTAR registry. J Endovasc Ther. 2000;7:105–122
  25. Trepanier C, Leung TK, Tabrizian M, Yahia L, Bienvenu JG, Tanguay JF, et al.  Preliminary investigations of the effects of surface treatments on biological response to shape memory NiTi stents. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater). 1999;48:165–171
  26. Starosvetsky E, Gotman I. Corrosion behavior of titanium nitride coated Ni-Ti shape memory surgical alloy. Biomaterials. 2001;22:1853–1859
  27. Trepanier C, Tabrizian M, Yahia L, Bilodeau L, Piron DL. Effect of modification of oxide layer on NiTi stent corrosion resistance. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater). 1998;43:433–440
  28. Duerig TW, Pelton AR, Stockel D. An overview of nitinol medical applications. Mater Sci Eng. 1999;A273:5149–5160
  29. Harris P, Brennan J, Martin J, Gould D, Bakaran A, Gilling-Smith G, et al.  Longitudinal aneurysm shrinkage following endovascular aortic: a source of intermediate and late complications. J Endovasc Surg. 1999;6:11–616
  30. Umschied T, Stelter WJ. Time-related alterations in shape, position, and structure of self-expanding modular aortic stent-grafts: a 4 year single center follow-up. J Endovasc Surg. 1999;6:17–32
  31. Teoh SH. Fatigue of biomaterials: a review. Int J Fatigue. 2000;22:825–837
  32. McKelvey AL, Ritchie RO. Fatigue-crack propagation in nitinol, a shape-memory and superelastic endovascular stent material. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;47:301–308
  33. Riepe G, Loos J, Imig H, Schroder A, Schneider E, Peterman J, et al.  Long-term in vivo alterations of polyester vascular grafts in humans. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;13:540–548
  34. Alimi YS, Chakfe N, Rivoal E, Slimane KK, Valerio N, Riepe G, et al.  Rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular graft placement and aneurysm size reduction. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28:178–183
  35. Device alert . Vanguard endoprosthesis: upper stent row separation with or without nitinol wire fracture. Available from URL:http:\\www.medical-devices.gov.uk/da2001(01).htmJan 2001; Accessed
  36. Zarins CK, White RA, Hodgson KJ, Schwarten D, Fogarty TJ. Endoleak as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair: AneurRx multicenter clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:90–107
  37. Wain RA, Marin ML, Ohki T, Sanchez LA, Lyon RT, Rozenblit A, et al.  Endoleaks after endovascular graft treatment of aortic aneurysms: classification, risk factors, and outcome. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:69–80
  38. Deaton DH, Makaroun MS, Fairman RM. Endoleak: predictive value for aneurysm growth at 3 years. Ann Vasc Surg. 2002;16:37–42
  39. Resch T, Ivancev K, Lindh M, Nyman U, Brunkwall J, Malina M, et al.  Persistant collateral perfusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair does not lead to progressive change in aneurysm diameter. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28:242–249
  40. Gilling-Smith G, Brennan J, Harris P, Bakran A, Gould D, McWilliams R. Endotension after endovascular aneurysm repair: definition, classification, and strategies for surveillance and intervention. J Endovasc Surg. 1999;6:305–307

☆ Competition of interest: nil.

☆☆ Reprint requests: Dr Michael L. Marin, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 5 E 98th St, Box 1259, New York, NY 10029-6574 (e-mail: michael.marin@mountsinai.org).

★ 0741-5214/2003/$30.00 + 0

PII: S0741-5214(02)75199-9

doi:10.1067/mva.2003.58

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 16-26, January 2003

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution