Journal Home
Search for

Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 16-26 (January 2003)


View previous. 4 of 60 View next.

Mechanical failure of prosthetic human implants: A 10-year experience with aortic stent graft devices☆☆

Presented at the Fiftieth Annual Meeting of the American Association for Vascular Surgery, Boston, Mass, Jun 9-12, 2002.

Tikva S. Jacobs, MD, Jamie Won, BS, Edwin C. Gravereaux, MD, Peter L. Faries, MD, Nicholas Morrissey, MD, Victoria J. Teodorescu, MD, Larry H. Hollier, MD, Michael L. Marin, MD

Received 18 June 2002; accepted 3 September 2002.

Abstract 

Objective: The first endovascular stent graft was implanted to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm more than a decade ago. This technique has evolved dramatically with the growing understanding of metallurgic and fabric sciences and improved device designs. However the potential for stent graft material failure remains. This investigation describes the incidence of material failure, potential modes of device fatigue, and the clinical significance of these failures. Methods: Six hundred eighty-six endovascular stent grafts were used to treat patients with aortic aneurysms. Device fatigue in the form of stent, suture fracture, or graft wear was identified with an analysis of follow-up radiographs and explanted stent grafts. A review of patient clinical histories, spiral computed tomographic scan studies, scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersion spectroscopy of explanted devices was conducted to evaluate the modes and consequences of failure. Results: Sixty patients were identified with device fatigue, 49 of whom had abdominal endovascular repairs and 11 of whom had thoracic repairs. Of the 60 patients with stent graft fatigue, 43 patients had metallic stent fractures, 14 had suture disruptions, and three had graft holes. These material failures occurred within seven distinct stent graft designs. The average time to the recognition of failure was 19 months, with a mean follow-up period of 8 months since the event was identified. Eleven patients died, and one was lost to follow-up 2 years after identification of a stent fracture. The remaining patients are presently being followed eoyj physical examination, plain film radiograph, and computed tomographic scans for clinical sequelae of device fatigue. Conclusion: Endovascular stent graft fatigue has been recognized in numerous devices after aortic implantation. Fatigue may take the form of stent, graft, or suture failure, with certain modes unique to specific stent graft devices. The clinical significance of stent graft material failure remains uncertain. (J Vasc Surg 2003;37:16-26).

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine. New York, NY

 Competition of interest: nil.

☆☆ Reprint requests: Dr Michael L. Marin, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 5 E 98th St, Box 1259, New York, NY 10029-6574 (e-mail: michael.marin@mountsinai.org).

 0741-5214/2003/$30.00 + 0

PII: S0741-5214(02)75199-9

doi:10.1067/mva.2003.58


View previous. 4 of 60 View next.