Pelvic congestion syndrome: Early clinical results after transcatheter ovarian vein embolization☆☆☆★★★
Abstract
Purpose: This case series describes the early radiographic and clinical results of attempted transcatheter ovarian vein (OV) embolization in 11 women with symptoms that were suggestive of the pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). Methods: Eleven women (mean age, 33.1 years) who were multiparous were referred for lower extremity or vulvar varicosities (n = 8) or for tubo-ovarian varicosities (n = 3). After a clinical diagnosis of PCS was established, the women underwent ovarian (n = 5) or ovarian and iliac vein (n = 6) venography. Enlarged or incompetent OVs were embolized with 0.035-inch stainless steel coils or with 0.018-inch platinum microcoils and absorbable gelatin sponge. Incompetent tributaries to hypogastric veins were embolized as well (n = l). Symptoms before embolization and after embolization were recorded with a standard questionnaire, and the post-embolization symptoms were expressed as individual and overall percent relief. Results: Nine of the 11 women underwent embolization. Embolization of both OVs (n = 4), of the left OV alone (n = 4), or of a left obturator vein that communicated with vulvar varices (n = l) was performed. Eight of the 9 women (88.9%) had more than 80% immediate relief. Overall and individual symptom relief varied from 40% to 100% at the mean 13.4-month follow-up. One woman with variant anatomy and one woman with evidence of prior left OV thrombosis were not treated. There were no major complications. Two women had a mild to moderate return of the symptoms at 6 and 22 months. Conclusions: Transcatheter embolization provides excellent initial and variable midterm relief in women with typical PCS symptoms and with OV or OV and internal iliac (hypogastric) tributary vein incompetence. This interventional technique may replace or complement the traditional surgical approaches to this rarely recognized and poorly understood disease. (J Vasc Surg 1998;28:862-8.)
☆ From the Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery (Drs Cordts, Buckley, and DeMaioribus), and the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (Drs Eclavea, Cockerill, and Yeager), Tripler Army Medical Center.
☆☆ The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views of Tripler Army Medical Center, the Department of the Army, or the Department of Defense.
★ Reprint requests: Paul R. Cordts, LTC, MC, Department of Surgery, MCHK DSG, CDR TAMC, 1 Jarrett White Rd, Tripler Army Medical Center, HI 96859-5000.
★★ 24/6/92672
PII: S0741-5214(98)70062-X
© 1998 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
